Advertisement

Multiple vs. Single Access PCNL

  • Michael Alfred V. Tan
  • Dennis G. Lusaya
Chapter

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard of care for large renal calculi which are no longer suitable for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. The key to success depends on the urologist’s choice of instruments, preoperative and intraoperative access planning, patience, perseverance, skill and training. Percutaneous renal access is a crucial early step that may ultimately influence outcomes of PCNL in terms of overall stone-free rate and complications. Several techniques for access and tract dilatation are described in this chapter. Prone, supine or lateral positioning during renal access have inherent advantages and disadvantages. Similarly, various adjunct imaging modalities and instrumentation are available to increase success and decrease the risk of complications. Nonetheless, the most practical and effective approach still depends heavily on stone burden and renal anatomy, available instrumentation and equipment, and the surgeon’s expertise and level of training.

Keywords

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy PCNL Stone 

References

  1. Chu C, et al. Ultrasound guided access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy a description of three novel ultrasound-guided needle techniques. J Endourol. 2016;30(2):153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ganpule A, et al. Multiperc versus single perc with flexible instrumentation for staghorn calculi. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1675–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ghani K, et al. Computed tomography for percutaneous renal access. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lingeman JE. Lecture: PCNL access. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University School of Medicine; 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Lojanapiwat B. The ideal puncture approach for PCNL: fluoroscopy, ultrasound or endoscopy? Indian J Urol. 2013;29(3):208–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McCallister M, et al. Intercostal nerves and vessels are at risk for injury during supracostal percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 2011;185:329–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller NL, et al. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007;178:15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pedro R, Rodriguez N. Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1645–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tomaszewski J, et al. Renal access by urologist or radiologist during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2010;24(11):1733–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Alfred V. Tan
    • 1
  • Dennis G. Lusaya
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Santo Tomas HospitalManilaPhilippines
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Santo TomasManilaPhilippines
  3. 3.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Santo TomasManilaPhilippines
  4. 4.St. Luke’s Medical Center Institute of UrologyQuezon CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations