Advertisement

Development of Robotic Urologic Surgery in Asia

  • Soodong D. Kim
  • Gyung Tak SungEmail author
  • Masatoshi Eto
  • Katsunori Tatsugami
  • Harshit Garg
  • Rajeev Kumar
  • Yinghao Sun
  • Bo Yang
  • Sheng-Tang Wu
  • Allen W. Chiu
  • Anthony C. F. Ng
  • Samuel C. H. Yee
  • Hong Gee Sim
  • Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
Chapter

Abstract

With the introduction of robotic-assisted surgical systems to surgical practice, there has been great progress and advancement in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has proven useful in reducing the risks and complications associated with open surgical procedures, thereby extending the benefits of MIS to a broader population of patients. RAS has made its way into almost every surgical discipline. Urology has been in the forefront of employing and standardizing robotic-assisted procedures in fields such as oncologic and reconstructive urology.

Although the da Vinci surgical system has been available for 17 years, high cost and steep maintenance fees have been major hurdles to its widespread acceptance. The next generation of surgical robots are being designed to expand robotic surgery into areas that are currently underserved, such as general abdominal, gynecological, and urological procedures, to enhance cost-effective management of patients. With the recent development and advancements in robotic technologies, RAS will continue to grow because of its tremendous potential to offer better health care to patients. Here, the pioneers from leading Asian institutions describe the development and current state of robotic surgery in their respective countries.

Keywords

Robot Urologic surgery 

References

  1. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Saloman L, et al. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol. 2000;10:520–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattu AS, Ganpule A, Sabnis RB, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Endourol. 2015;29:1334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bo Y, Juan J, Zhi S, et al. The first clinical application experience of domestic Smartbot S surgical robot. Chin J Gen Surg. 2016;31:512–3.Google Scholar
  4. Bora GS, Mavuduru RS, Sharma AP, et al. Initial experience of robotic nephron sparing surgery in cases of high renal nephrometry scores. Indian J Urol. 2017;33:230–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan ESY, Yee CH, Chiu PKF, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a side-docking technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(3):207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Data published by Chindex Co., Ltd. n.d.Google Scholar
  7. Cho CL, Ho KL, Chu SS, et al. Robotic assisted versus standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes from a single institution. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desai M, Chabra J, Ganpule AP. Robotic surgery is ready for prime time in India: for the motion. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11:2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dogra PN, Javali TD, Singh P, et al. Perioperative outcome of initial 190 cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy – a single-center experience. Indian J Urol. 2012a;28:159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dogra PN, Abrol N, Singh P, et al. Outcomes following robotic radical nephrectomy: a single-center experience. Urol Int. 2012b;89:78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eto M, Yokomizo A, Koga H, et al. A laparoscopic radical prostatectomy assisted by the “ZEUS” robotic system: an initial case report. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2005;96(2):58–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan G, Zhou Z, Zhang H, et al. Global scientific production of robotic surgery in medicine: a 20-year survey of research activities. Int J Surg. 2016;30:126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with Da Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2004;64:914–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gondo T, Yoshioka K, Nakagami Y, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative and pathologic outcomes in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42(7):625–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Capelle O. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2001;165:V75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta NP, Yadav R, Akpo EE. Continence outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy: our experience from 150 consecutive patients. Indian J Urol. 2014;30:374–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, et al. The Probot—an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1997;211:317–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(8):1187–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemal AK, Mishra S, Mukharjee S, Suryavanshi M. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Int J Urol. 2008a;15:744–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemal AK, Kolla SB, Wadhwa P. First case series of robotic radical cystoprostatectomy, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, and urinary diversion with the da Vinci S system. J Robot Surg. 2008b;2:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirano D, Minei S, Yamaguchi K, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors via a single large port. J Endourol. 2005;19:788–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ho H, Yuen JS, Mohan P, et al. Robotic transperineal prostate biopsy: pilot clinical study. Urology. 2011;78(5):1203–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Statistical data from the Taiwan agents of Intuitive Surgical Inc. n.d.Google Scholar
  24. Jain S, Gautam G. Robotics in urologic oncology. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11:40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kakeji Y, Konishi K, Ieiri S, et al. Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Int J Med Robot. 2006;2(4):299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang SG, Choi H, Ko YH, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureterectomy and ureteral reimplantation. Korean J Urol. 2009;50:921–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim SC, Kang T, Park H. Experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty, including robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Korean J Urol. 2009;50:996–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim DK, Lee JW, Park SY, et al. Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy in urachal diseases. Korean J Urol. 2010;51:318–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kong GS, Seong YK, Sung GT. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using da Vinci TM Surgical robotic system: initial Korean experience. Korean J Urol. 2005;46:353–9.Google Scholar
  30. Kumar R, Hemal AK. Emerging role of robotics in urology. J Minim Access Surg. 2005;1:202–10.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar R, Yadav R, Kolla SB. Simultaneous bilateral robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasties for bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction: technique and literature review. J Endourol. 2007;21:750–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar S, Pragatheeswarane M, Sharma AP, et al. Expanding the horizon of robotic surgery to large pelvic paraganglioma. J Robot Surg. 2017a;11:247–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar S, Bishnoi K, Panwar VK, et al. Stone in ectopic pelvic pancake kidney: a surgical challenge overcome by robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2017b;12:181–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee YS, Han WK, Yang SC, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol. 2006;47:206–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee SH, Kim DS, Chang SG, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage IIIb mixed germ cell testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:540–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li J, Wang S, Wang X, et al. Optimization of a novel mechanism for a minimally invasive surgery robot. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6(1):83–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Low AL, Sim HG, Huang HH, et al. Oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a multiracial Asian population. J Robot Surg. 2015;9(3):201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2003;92:232–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nelivigi GG. Robotic surgery: India is not ready yet. Indian J Urol. 2007;23:240–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pahwa M, Pahwa AR, Batra R, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: initial experience from a tertiary care centre in India. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11:83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Park SY, Kim HJ, Seo JW, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol. 2008a;49:387–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Park SY, Cho KS, Park KK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion. Korean J Urol. 2008b;49:506–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Park SY, Cho KS, Ham WS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff excision. Korean J Urol. 2008c;49:373–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robotic Surgery Vattikuti Fellowship for 7 Indian Surgeons. 2016. https://www.healthcareexecutive.in/robotic-surgery-vattikuti-fellowship-7-indian-surgeons. Accessed 18 Aug 2017.
  45. Ruqi M. Development of a minimally invasive surgical robot executive system and study of its control algorithm. Harbin University of Science and Technology. 2013.Google Scholar
  46. Sackier JM1, Wang Y. Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(1):63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Satava RM. Virtual reality, telesurgery, and the new world order of medicine. J Image Guid Surg. 1995;1:12–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schurr MO, Arezzo A, Neisius B, et al. Trocar and instrument positioning system TISKA. An assist device for endoscopic solo surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(5):528–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seo IY. Urologic robotic surgery in Korea: past and present. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:546–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shiroki R, Fukami N, Fukaya K, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: superiority over laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol. 2016;23(2):122–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sim HG, Yip SKH, Lau WKO, et al. Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Surg. 2004;27(4):321–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sim HG, Yip SKH, Lau WKO, et al. Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2006;13(5):560–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hospital Authority Surgical Outcomes Monitoring & Improvement Program (SOMIP) Report, vol 5 (July 2012–June 2013).Google Scholar
  54. Hospital Authority Surgical Outcomes Monitoring & Improvement Program (SOMIP) Report, vol 8 (July 2015–June 2016).Google Scholar
  55. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology. 2001;58(6):893–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang LS, Chung SFCM, Yip SKH, et al. The natural history of voiding function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2011;29(2):177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yip SKH, Sim HG. Robotic prostatectomy in East Asia: surgical results, development and challenges. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;20(1):80–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yip SKH, Yee CH, Ng CF, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Hong Kong: a review of 235 cases. J Endourol. 2012;26(3):258–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yoshioka K, Hatano T, Nakagami Y, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan. J Robot Surg. 2008;2(2):85–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. You JY, Lee HY, Son GS, et al. Comparison of robotic adrenalectomy with traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy with a lateral transperitoneal approach: a single-surgeon experience. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:345–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soodong D. Kim
    • 1
  • Gyung Tak Sung
    • 1
    Email author
  • Masatoshi Eto
    • 2
  • Katsunori Tatsugami
    • 2
  • Harshit Garg
    • 3
  • Rajeev Kumar
    • 3
  • Yinghao Sun
    • 4
    • 5
  • Bo Yang
    • 6
  • Sheng-Tang Wu
    • 7
  • Allen W. Chiu
    • 8
  • Anthony C. F. Ng
    • 9
  • Samuel C. H. Yee
    • 9
  • Hong Gee Sim
    • 10
    • 11
  • Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
    • 12
    • 13
  1. 1.Department of UrologyDong-A Medical CenterBusanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of UrologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Chinese Academy of EngineeringBeijingChina
  5. 5.Department of UrologyShanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
  6. 6.Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai HospitalNaval Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
  7. 7.Division of Urology, Department of SurgeryTri-service General Hospital and National Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  8. 8.School of MedicineNational Yang-Ming UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  9. 9.Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  10. 10.Gleneagles Medical CentreRavenna Urology ClinicSingaporeSingapore
  11. 11.NUS YLL School of MedicineSingaporeSingapore
  12. 12.Department of UrologySingapore General Hospital (SGH)SingaporeSingapore
  13. 13.Sengkang General HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations