Advertisement

Bridging the Gap Between Open Surgery and Robotics

  • Dennis P. SerranoEmail author
  • Sylvia Karina L. Alip
Chapter

Abstract

The late twentieth century was a period of transition from purely open to minimally invasive to robot-assisted surgeries, accompanied by slow integration of these validated technologies into various training curricula, across Southeast Asia. For the individual surgeon, transitioning from open to robotic surgery include—developing technical proficiency in handling the robot complemented by the application of expected cognitive and skills mastery that comes with traditional open surgical training. This can be further facilitated by simulators, mentoring, dual-console training and credentialing; and team transitioning. Challenges in transitioning from open to robotic surgery will always be present, but they are predictable and programs are already in place to equip both novice and experienced surgeons with the tools they need.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Laparoscopic surgery Transitioning Team transitioning Credentialing Training 

References

  1. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed K, Khan R, Mottrie A, Lovegrove C, Abaza R, Ahlawat R, Dasgupta P. Development of a standardize training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts. BJU Int. 2015;116(1):93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JR. Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Worth Publishers; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Fisher RA, Dasgupta P, Mottrie A, Volpe A, Khan MS, Challacombe B, Ahmed K. An over-view of robot assisted surgery curricula and the status of their validation. Int J Surg. 2015;13:115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Francis P. The evolution of robotics in surgery and implementing a perioperative robotics nurse specialist role. AORN J. 2006;83(3):629–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies L, Hibberd B, Coptcoat R, Wickham J. A surgeon robot prostatectomy–a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol. 1989;13:273–7.Google Scholar
  7. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:171–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson EK, Wood DP. Converting from open to robotic prostatectomy: key concepts. Urol Oncol. 2010;28(1):77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic tasks between experienced surgeons and novices in laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study. Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, et al. A robot with improved positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35:153–61.Google Scholar
  11. Müller S, Patel HRH. Lessons learned from the aviation industry: surgical checklists. In: Simulation training in laparoscopy and robotic surgery. London: Springer; 2012. p. 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Nguan C, Girvan A, Luke PP. Robotic surgery vs. laparoscopy: a comparison between two robotic systems and laparoscopy. J Robot Surg. 2008;1:263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Brien ST, Shukla AR. Transition for open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8:276–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Patel VR. Robotic urologic surgery. London: Springer; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogula T, Acquafresca PA, Bazan M. Training and credentialing in robotic surgery. Essentials of robotic surgery XIII. 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Sahabudin RM, Arni T, Ashani N, et al. Development of robotic program: an Asian experience. World J Urol. 2006;24(2):161–4. Epub 2006 Apr 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Satava RM. Future directions in robotic surgery. In: Surgical robotics: systems applications and visions. NY: Springer; 2011. p. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schreuder HWR, Verheijen RHM. Robotic surgery. BJOG. 2009;116(2):198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schreuder HWR, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RHM. Requirements for efficient robotic surgery training, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG. 2012;119(2):137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. A consensus document on robotic surgery. 2007. Available at: http://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/consensus-document-robotic-surgery/.
  21. Witte TEF. Requirements for efficient robotic surgery training. A master thesis. University of Twente. 2015.Google Scholar
  22. Yu D-S. Emerging robot-assisted surgery: contemporary perspectives in Taiwan. JTUA. 2007;18:179–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Urology, Department of SurgeryPhilippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines College of MedicineManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations