Advertisement

Management of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

  • Divya Pandey
  • Sumita Mehta
Chapter

Abstract

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a premalignant condition of the vulva, which is increasingly becoming common especially during the fifth decade of life. As per the latest ISSVD (International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease) terminology, HSIL (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and dVIN (differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia) can develop into invasive cancer. The diagnosis of HSIL and dVIN can be done using biopsy of suspicious lesions or by identifying abnormal areas using vulvoscopy and confirming by taking biopsy of acetowhite lesions. Treatment depends upon the number and site of lesions and includes options like wide local excision, skinning vulvectomy, laser ablation and topical immune-modulator therapy.

Keywords

Vulval intraepithelial lesions HSIL dVIN Vulvoscopy Skinning vulvectomy Topical imiquimod Topical cidofovir Photodynamic therapy 

References

  1. 1.
    Judson PL, Habermann EB, Baxter NN, Durham SB, Virnig BA. Trends in the incidence of invasive and in situ vulvar carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1018–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedrich EG. Report of the committee on terminology. New nomenclature for vulvar disease. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;49:122–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bornstein J, Bogliatto F, Haefner HK, et al. The 2015 International Society for the study of vulvovaginal disease (ISSVD) terminology of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016;20:11–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Committee on Gynecologic Practice of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologista. ACOG Committee opinion no. 509. Management of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Waxman AG, Chelmow D, Darragh TH, et al. Revised terminology foe cervical histopathology and its implications for management of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Thomas Cox J, et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous terminology standardization project for HPV-associated lesion: background and consequence recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013;32:76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilkinson E. The histopathology of vulvar neoplasia. Global Library of women’s medicine (ISSN:175-2228). 2002.  https://doi.org/10.3843/GLOWM.10256. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.
  8. 8.
    Crum CP, Herrington CS, McCluggage WG, et al. Tumours of the vulva; epithelial tumours. In: Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, et al., editors. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cullis P, Mudzamiri T, Millan D, Siddiqui N. Vulval intraepithelial neoplasia: making sense of the literature. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;13:73–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rutledge F, Sinclair M. Treatment of intraepithelial carcinoma of the vulva by skin excision and graft. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;102:807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Podczaski E, Sexton M, Kaminski P, et al. Recurrent carcinoma of the vulva after conservative treatment for microinvasive disease. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;39:65–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baachi CE, Goldfogel GA, Greer BE, et al. Paget’s disease and melanoma of the vulv. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;46:216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hacker NF. Surgery for malignant tumours of the vulva. In: Gershansen DM, Dc Cherney AH, Curry SL, Brubaker L, editors. Operative gynecology oncology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 237–63.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brigitte E, Miller MD. VIN treated with Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85:114–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaushik S, Pepas L, Nordin A, Bryant A, Dickinson HO. Surgical interventions for high-grade vulval intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:CD007928.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007928.pub3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mathiesen O, Buus SK, Cramers M. Topical imiquimod can reverse vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised, double-blinded study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:219–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lawrie TA, Nordin A, Chakrabarti M, Bryant A, Kaushik S, Pepas L. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual-type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;1:CD011837.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011837.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Terlou A, van Seters M, Ewing PC, Aaronson NK, Gundy CM, Heijmans-Antonissen C, Quint WG, Blok LJ, van Beurden M, Helmerhorst TJ. Treatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia with topical imiquimod: seven years median follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:157–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tristam A, Flander A. Clinical responses to Cidofovir applied topically to women with high grade vulval intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(3):652–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stier EA, Goldstone SE, Einstein MH, Jay N, Berry JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of topical cidofovir to treat high-grade perianal and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive men and women. AIDS. 2013;27(4):545–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tristram T, Hurt CN, Madden T, Powell N, Man S, et al. Activity, safety, and feasibility of cidofovir and imiquimod for treatment of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (RT3VIN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1361–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70456-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pepas L, Kaushik S, Nordin A, Bryant A, Lawrie TA. Medical interventions for high-grade vulval intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD007924.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007924.pub3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hillemanns P, Wnag X, Staehle S, Michels W, Dannecker C. Evaluation of different treatment modalities for vulvar intra epithelial neoplasia: CO2 laser vaporization, photodynamic therapy, excision and vulvectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:271–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morton CA, McKenna KE, Rhodes LE, British Association of Dermatologists Therapy Guidelines and Audit Subcommittee and the British Photodermatology Group. Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: update. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:1245–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08882.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurwa HA, Barlow RJ, Neill S. Single-episode photodynamic therapy and vulval intraepithelial neoplasia type III resistant to conventional therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1040–2.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03785.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hillemanns P, Untch M, Dannecker C, Baumgartner R, Stepp H, Diebold J, Weingandt H, Pröve F, Korell M. Photodynamic therapy of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia using 5-aminolevulinic acid. Int J Cancer. 2000;85:649–53.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000301)85:5<649:AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-E.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fehr MK, Hornung R, Schwarz VA, Simeon R, Haller U, Wyss P. Photodynamic therapy of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia III using topically applied 5-aminolevulinic acid. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:62–6.  https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.6028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin-Hirsch PL, Whitehurst C, Buckley CH, Moore JV, Kitchener HC. Photodynamic treatment for lower genital tract intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet. 1998;351:1403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)24019-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ang JM, Riaz IB, Kamal MU, Paragh G, Zeitouni NC. Photodynamic therapy and pain: a systematic review. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2017;19:308–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Soergel P, Hillemanns P. Photodynamic therapy for intraepithelial neoplasia of the lower genital tract. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2010;7:10–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2009.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Downs AM, Geraghty JM, Jones C. Fluorouracil does not improve the outcome of imiquimoid treatment of vulvar intraepithelial lesions. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85:368–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tseng J-Y, Baster E, Gungor UF. Management of precancerous lesions prior to conception and during pregnancy: a narrative review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care. 2012;21(6):703–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Esch EM, Dam MC, Osse ME, Putter H, Trimbos BJ, Fleuren G, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with development of recurrence and progression in usual type vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:1476–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Modesitt SC, Waters AB, Walton L, Fowler WC Jr, Van Le L. Vulvar Intraepithelial neoplasia III: occult cancer and the impact of margin status on recurrence. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:962–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hillemanns P, Wang X, Stachle S, Michels W, Dannecker C. Evaluation of different treatment modalities for vulva intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN):CO2 laser vaporization, photodynamic therapy, excision and vulvectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100(2):271–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Management of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia, ACOG and ASCCP Committee opinion no. 675. 2016.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jones RW, Rowan DM, Stewart AW. Vulvar Intra epithelial neoplasia: aspects of natural history and outcome in 405 women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(6):1319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Van seters M, Van Buerden M, de Craen AJ. Is the assumed natural history of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia III based on enough evidence? A systematic review of 3322 published patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(2):645–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    van Beurden M, ten Kate FJ, Smits HL, Berkhout RJ, de Craen AJ, van der Vange N, et al. Multifocal vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade III and multicentric lower genital tract neoplasia is associated with transcriptionally active human papillomavirus. Cancer. 1995;75:2879–84.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:123.0.CO;2-W.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McNally OM, Mulvany NJ, Pagano R, Quinn MA, Rome RM. VIN 3: a clinicopathologic review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12:490–5.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01140.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pilotti S, Rotola A, D’Amato L, Di Luca D, Shah KV, Cassai E, et al. Vulvar carcinomas: search for sequences homologous to human papillomavirus and herpes simplex virus DNA. Mol Pathol. 1990;3:442–8.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee A, Bradford J, Fischer G. Long term management of adult vulvar lichen sclerosus: a prospective cohort study of 507 women. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1061–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Villa LL, Costa RL, Petta CA, Andrade RP, Ault KA, Giuliano AR, et al. Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:271–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70101-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Davidson EJ, Boswell CM, Sell P, Pawlita M, Tomlinson AC, McVey RJ, et al. Immunological and clinical responses in women with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia vaccinated with a vaccinia virus encoding human papillomavirus 16/18 oncoproteins. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6032–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Divya Pandey
    • 1
  • Sumita Mehta
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyVardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung HospitalNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBabu Jagjivan Ram Memorial HospitalNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations