Advertisement

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and Their Potential in Environmental Management: Constraints, Prospects, and Challenges

  • Gaurav Saxena
  • Roop Kishor
  • Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale
  • Ram Naresh Bharagava
Chapter

Abstract

Increasing environmental contamination with highly toxic chemicals is warning us to find sustainable technologies to protect the environment and human health, which is a key challenge of the current scenario. A variety of physicochemical technologies are currently being applied presently to decontaminate the environment to safeguard the environment and human health. However, these technologies are costly and chemical-consuming, thus causing secondary pollution and, hence, are not environmental-friendly. As an alternative approach, bioremediation technologies using microbes and plants and their enzymes are currently viewed as eco-friendly and most sustainable technologies due to their self-sustainable and low-cost nature. But sometimes bioremediation technologies are get limited by low degradability/accumulability of microbes and plants, respectively. To overcome these limitations, genetic engineering approaches are highly decisive to design the transgenic microbes and plants for the enhanced biodegradation and biodetoxification of environmental pollutants for sustainable development. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) offer great potential for environmental remediation, and hence, in this chapter, we focused on the applications of GMOs in the environmental management with risks involved, constraints, and challenges faced by researchers in the release of GMOs for field applications.

Keywords

Environmental pollutants Genetically modified organisms Environmental remediation Transgene Genetic engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Gaurav Saxena and Roop Kishor are thankful to the University Grants Commission (UGC) Fellowship from UGC, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

References

  1. Abhilash PC, Jamil S, Singh N (2009) Transgenic plants for enhanced biodegradation and phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics. Biotechnol Adv 27:474–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerley DF, Gonzalez CF, Keyhan M, Blake R, Matin A (2004) Mechanism of chromate reduction by the Escherichia coli protein, NfsA, and the role of different chromate reductases in minimizing oxidative stress during chromate reduction. Environ Microbiol 6:851–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkorta I, Herna´ndez-Allica J, Becerril JM, Amezaga I, Albizu I, Garbisu C (2004) Recent findings on the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with environmentally toxic heavy metals and metalloids such as zinc, cadmium, lead and arsenic. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3:71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atlas RM (1992) Molecular methods for environmental monitoring and Containment of genetically engineered microorganisms. Biodegradation 3:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azubuike CC, Chikere CB,Okpokwasili GC (2016) Bioremediation techniques–classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32(11):180
  6. Baker A, McGrath S, Reeves R, Smith J (2000) Metal hyperaccumulator plants: a review of the ecology and physiology of a biological resource for phytoremediation of metal polluted soils. In: Terry N, Bañuelos GS (eds) Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water. CRC, Boca, pp 85–107Google Scholar
  7. Balestrazzi A, Bonadei M, Quattrini E, Carbonera D (2009) Occurrence of multiple metal resistance in bacterial isolates associated with transgenic white poplars (Populus alba L.). Ann Microbiol 59:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee S, Shang TQ, Wilson AM, Moore AL, Strand SE, Gordon MP, Doty SL (2002) Expression of functional mammalian P450 2E1 in hairy root cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:462–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barac T, Taghavi S, Borremans B, Provoost A, Oeyen L, Colpaert JV, Vangronsveld J, van der Lelie D (2004) Engineered endophytic bacteria improve phytoremediation of water-soluble, volatile, organic pollutants. Nat Biotechnol 22:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Mulla SI, Patel DK (2017a) Characterization and identification of recalcitrant organic pollutants (ROPs) in tannery wastewater and its phytotoxicity evaluation for environmental safety. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-017-0490-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Chowdhary P (2017b) Constructed wetlands: An emerging phytotechnology for degradation and detoxification of industrial wastewaters. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, San Diego, pp 397–426.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bharagava RN, Chowdhary P, Saxena G (2017c) Bioremediation: An ecosustainable green technology: Its applications and limitations. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bharagava RN, Purchase D, Saxena G, Mulla SI (2018) Applications of metagenomics in microbial bioremediation of pollutants: From genomics to environmental cleanup. In: Das S, Dash H (eds) Microbial diversity in the genomic era, 1st edn. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814849-5.00026-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Mulla SI (2019) Introduction to industrial wastes containing organic and inorganic pollutants and bioremediation approaches for environmental management. In: Saxena G, Bharagava RN (eds) Bioremediation of industrial waste for environmental safety: volume I: industrial waste and its management. Springer Nature, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1891-7_1
  15. Bhuiyan MSU, Min SR, Jeong WJ, Sultana S, Choi KS, Song WY, Lee Y, Lim TP, Liu JR (2011) Overexpression of a yeast cadmium factor 1 (YCF1) enhances heavy metal tolerance and accumulation in Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 105:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brim H, McFarlan SC, Fredrickson JK, Minton KW, Zhai M, Wackett LP, Daly MJ (2000) Engineering Deinococcus radiodurans for metal remediation in radioactive mixed waste environments. Nat Biotechnol 18:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burken JG, Schnoor JL (1998) Uptake and fate of organic contaminants by hybrid poplar trees. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 213, 106-ENVRGoogle Scholar
  18. Chandra R, Saxena G, Kumar V (2015) Phytoremediation of environmental pollutants: an eco-sustainable green technology to environmental management. In: Chandra R (ed) Advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, San Diego, pp 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b18218-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cherian S, Oliveira MM (2005) Transgenic plants in phytoremediation: recent advances and new possibilities. Environ Sci Technol 39:9377–9390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Araujo BS, Charlwood BV, Pletsch M (2002) Tolerance and metabolism of phenol and chloroderivatives by hairy root cultures of Daucus carota L. Environ Pollut 117:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deng X, Wilson DB (2001) Bioaccumulation of mercury from wastewater by genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:276–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deng X, Li QB, Lu YH, Sun DH, Huang YL, Chen XR (2003) Bioaccumulation of nickel from aqueous solutions by genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Water Res 37:2505–2511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deng X, Li QB, Lu YH, Sun DH, He N (2005) Genetic engineering of Escherichia coli SE5000 and its potential for Ni2+ bioremediation. Process Biochem 40:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deng D, Deng J, Li J, Zhang J, Hu M, Lin Z (2008) Accumulation of zinc, cadmium, and lead in four populations of Sedum alfredii growing on lead/zinc mine spoils. J Integr Plant Biol 50:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dixit P, Singh S, Vanchesswaran R, Patnala K, Eapen S (2010) Expression of a Neurospora crassa zinc transporter gene in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum enhances plant zinc accumulation without co-transport of cadmium. Plant Cell Environ 35(10):1696–1707Google Scholar
  26. Doty SL (2008) Enhancing phytoremediation through the use of transgenics and endophytes. New Phytol 179:318–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doty SL, Shang QT, Wilson AM, Moore AL, Newman LA, Strand SE, Gordon MP (2000) Enhanced metabolism of halogenated hydrocarbons in transgenic plants contain mammalian P450 2E1. Proc Natal Acad Sci USA 97:6287–6629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doty SL, James CA, Moore AL, Vajz ovic A, Singleton GL, Ma C, Khan Z, Xin G, Kang JW, Park AY, Meilan R, Strauss SH, Wilkerson J, Farin F, Strand SE (2007) Enhanced phytoremediation of volatile environmental pollutants with transgenic trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16816–16821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dua M, Singh A, Sethunathan N, Johri AK (2002) Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eapen S, D’Souza SF (2005) Prospects of genetic engineering of plants for phytoremediation of toxic metals. Biotechnol Adv 23:97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eapen S, Singh S, D’Souza SF (2007) Advances in development of transgenic plants for remediation of xenobiotic pollutants. Biotechnol Adv 25:442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Folch A, Vilaplana M, Amado L, Vicent R, Caminal G (2013) Fungal permeable reactive barrier to remediate groundwater in an artificial aquifer. J Hazard Mater 262:554–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frascari D, Zanaroli G, Danko AS (2015) In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: a review. J Hazard Mater 283:382–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman JL, Persans MW, Nieman K, Salt DE (2005) Nickel and cobalt resistance engineered in Escherichia coli by overexpression of serine acetyltransferase from the nickel hyperaccumulator plant Thlaspi goesingense. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8627–8633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fulkerson JF, Garner RM, Mobley HLT (1998) Conserved residues and motifs in the nixA protein of Helicobacter pylori are critical for the high affinity transport of nickel ions. J Biol Chem 273:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Furukawa K (2003) Super bugs’ for bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol 21:187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gasic K, Korban SS (2007) Transgenic Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) plants expressing an Arabidopsis phytochelatin synthase (AtPCS1) exhibit enhanced As and Cd tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 64:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gautam S, Kaithwas G, Bharagava RN, Saxena G (2017) Pollutants in tannery wastewater, pharmacological effects and bioremediation approaches for human health protection and environmental safety. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 369–396.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gisbert C, Ros R, De Haro A, Walker DJ, Pilar Bernal M, Serrano R (2003) A plant genetically modified that accumulates Pb is especially promising for phytoremediation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 303:440–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goutam SP, Saxena G, Singh V, Yadav AK, Bharagava RN (2018) Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using leaf extract of Jatropha curcas L. for photocatalytic degradation of tannery wastewater. Chem Eng J 336:386–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guo J, Dai X, Xu W, Ma M (2008) Overexpressing gsh1 and AsPCS1 simultaneously increases the tolerance and accumulation of cadmium and arsenic in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chemosphere 72:1020–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hannink NK, Subramanian M, Rosser SJ, Basran A, Murray JAH, Shanks JV, Bruce NC (2007) Enhanced transformation of TNT by tobacco plants expressing a bacterial nitroreductase. Int J Phytoremediation 9:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harvey S, Elashvili I, Valdes J, Kamely D, Chakrabarty AM (1990) Enhanced removal of Exxon Valdez spilled oil from Alaskan gravel by a microbial surfactant. Biotechnology 8:228–230Google Scholar
  44. Hasin AA, Gurman SJ, Murphy LM, Perry A, Smith TJ, Gardiner PE (2010) Remediation of chromium (VI) by a methane-oxidizing bacterium. Environ Sci Technol 44:400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hassani AH (2014) Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals resulting from acidic sludge of Eshtehard industrial town using native pasture plants. J Environ Earth Sci 4(19):87–94Google Scholar
  46. Haugland RA, Schlemm DJ, Lyons RP III, Sferra PR, Chakrabarty AM (1990) Degradation of the chlorinated phenoxyacetate herbicides 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid by pure and mixed bacterial cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1357–1362Google Scholar
  47. Hsieh JL, Chen CY, Chiu MH, Chein MF, Chang JS, Endo G, Huang CC (2009) Expressing a bacterial mercuric ion binding protein in plant for phytoremediation of heavy metals. J Hazard Mater 161:920–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Inui H, Ohkawa H (2005) Herbicide resistance in transgenic plants with mammalian P450 monooxygenase genes. ​Pest Manag Sci 61(3):286–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ivask A, Dubourguier HC, Pollumaa L, Kahru A (2011) Bioavailability of Cd in 110 polluted topsoils to recombinant bioluminescent sensor bacteria: effect of soil particulate matter. J Soils Sediments 11:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Iwamoto T, Nasu M (2001) Current bioremediation practice and perspective. J Biosci Bioeng 92:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jackson EG, Rylott EL, Fournier D, Hawari J, Bruce NC (2007) Exploring the biochemical properties and remediation applications of the unusual explosive-degrading P450 system XplA/B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16822–16827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. James CA, Strand SE (2009) Phytoremediation of small organic contaminants using transgenic plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jan AT, Murtaza I, Ali A, Mohad Q, Haq R (2009) Mercury pollution: an emerging problem and potential bacterial remediation strategies. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1529–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jin R, Yang H, Zhang A, Wang J, Liu G (2009) Bioaugmentation on decolorization of C.I. Direct Blue 71 using genetically engineered strain Escherichia coli JM109 (pGEX-AZR). J Hazard Mater 163:1123–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jussila MM, Zhao J, Suominen L, Lindström K (2007) TOL plasmid transfer during bacterial conjugation in vitro and rhizoremediation of oil compounds in vivo. Environ Pollut 146(2):510–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kang SH, Singh S, Kim JY, Lee W, Mulchandani A, Chen W (2007) Bacteria metabolically engineered for enhanced phytochelatin production and cadmium accumulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6317–6320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Karavangeli M, Labrou NE, Clonis YD, Tsaftaris A (2005) Development of transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing maize glutathione S-transferase I for chloroacetanilide herbicides phytoremediation. Biomol Eng 22:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kawahigashi H (2009) Transgenic plants for phytoremediation of herbicides. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kawahigashi H, Hirose S, Ohkawa H, Ohkawa Y (2007) Herbicide resistance of transgenic rice plants expressing human CYP1A1. Biotechnol Adv 25:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kawahigashi H, Hirose S, Ohkawa H, Ohkawa Y (2008) Transgenic rice plants expressing human P450 genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism for phytoremediation. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 15:212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kim S, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Kim J-O, Chung J (2014) Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated sites by DNA diagnosis-based bioslurping technology. Sci Total Environ 497:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kishor R, Bharagava RN, Saxena G (2018) Industrial wastewaters: The major sources of dye contamination in the environment, ecotoxicological effects, and bioremediation approaches. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Recent advances in environmental management. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  63. Kiyono M, Sone Y, Nakamura R, Pan-Hou H, Sakabe K (2009) The Mer E protein encoded by transposon Tn21 is a broad mercury transporter in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 583:1127–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kolata G (1985) How safe are engineered organisms? Science 229:34–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kube M, Beck A, Zinder SH, Kuhl H, Reinhardt R, Adrian L (2005) Genome sequence of the chlorinated compound respiring bacterium Dehalococcoides species strain CBDB1. Nat Biotechnol 23:1269–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kulshreshtha S (2013) Genetically engineered microorganisms: a problem solving approach for bioremediation. J Bioremed Biodegr 4:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD, Dhewa T (2011) Bioremediation of polluted environment: a management tool. Int J Environ Sci 1:6Google Scholar
  68. Kumar S, Dagar VK, Khasa YP, Kuhad RC (2013) Genetically modified microorganisms (GMOS) for bioremediation. In: Kuhad R, Singh A (eds) Biotechnology for environmental management and resource recovery. Springer, New Delhi, pp 191–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kurumata M, Takahashi M, Sakamoto A, Ramos JL, Nepovim A, Vanek T, Hirata T, Morikawa H (2005) Tolerance to, and uptake and degradation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) are enhanced by the expression of a bacterial nitroreductase gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Z Naturforsch C 60:272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lee SW, Glickmann E, Cooksey DA (2001) Chromosomal locus for cadmium resistance in Pseudomonas putida consisting of a cadmium-transporting ATPase and a MerR family response regulator. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1437–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Liu S, Zhang F, Chen J, Sun GX (2011) Arsenic removal from contaminated soil via biovolatilization by genetically engineered bacteria under laboratory conditions. J Environ Sci 23(10):60570–60570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Liu D, An Z, Mao Z, Ma L, Lu Z (2015) Enhanced heavy metal tolerance and accumulation by transgenic sugar beets expressing Streptococcus thermophilus StGCS-GS in the presence of Cd, Zn and Cu alone or in combination. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0128824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lovely DR (2003) Cleaning up with genomics: applying molecular biology to bioremediation. Nat Rev Microbiol 1:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lu L, Tian S, Yang X, Wang X, Brown P, Li T (2008) Enhanced root-to-shoot translocation of cadmium in the hyperaccumulating ecotype of Sedum alfredii. J Exp Bot 59:3203–3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Macek T, Kotrba P, Svatos A, Novakova M, Demnerova K, Mackova M (2008) Novel roles for genetically modified plants in environmental protection. Trends Biotechnol 26:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Martin W (1999) Mosaic bacterial chromosomes: a challenge en route to a tree of genomes. BioEssays 21(2):99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martinez M, Bernal P, Almela C, Velez D, Garcia-Agustin P, Serrano R (2006) An engineered plant that accumulates higher levels of heavy metals than Thlaspi caerulescens, with yields of 100 times more biomass in mine soils. Chemosphere 64:478–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Massa V, Infantin OA, Radice F, Orlandi V, Tavecchio F, Giudici R, Conti F, Urbini G, Di Guardo A, Barbieri P (2009) Efficiency of natural and engineered bacterial strains ins the degradation of 4-chlorobenzoic acid in soil slurry. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 63(1):112–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Meagher RB (2000) Phytoremediation of toxic elemental and organic pollutants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Milner MJ, Kochian LV (2008) Investigating heavy-metal hyperaccumulation using Thlaspi caerulescens as a model system. Ann Bot 102:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Misra S, Gedamu L (1989) Heavy metal tolerant transgenic Brassica napus L. and Nicotiana tabacum L. plants. Theor Appl Genet 78:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nahar N, Aminur R, Nawani NN, Ghosh S, Mandal A (2017) Phytoremediation of arsenic from the contaminated soil using transgenic tobacco plants expressing ACR2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Newman LA, Reynolds CM (2004) Phytodegradation of organic compounds. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Grolsman EA (2000) Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Olugbenga G (2017) Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) and its environmental conflict situation in Nigeria. Am J Environ Policy Manag 3(5):31–38Google Scholar
  86. Ozcan F, Kahramanogullari CT, Kocak N, Yildiz M, Haspolat I, Tuna E (2011) Use of genetically modified organisms in the remediation of soil and water R ecology and environmental problems, November 17–20Google Scholar
  87. Parnell JJ, Park J, Denef V, Tsoi T, Hashsham S, Quensen JI, Tiedje JM (2006) Coping with polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) toxicity: physiological and genomewide responses of Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 to PCB-mediated stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6607–6614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Patel J, Zhang Q, Michael R, McKay L, Vincent R, Xu Z (2010) Genetic engineering of Caulobacter crescentus for removal of cadmium from water. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160:232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Paul D, Pandey G, Jain RK (2005) Suicidal genetically engineered microorganisms for bioremediation: need and perspectives. BioEssays 27(5):563–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Philp JC, Atlas RM (2005) Bioremediation of contaminated soils and aquifers. In: Atlas RM, Philp JC (eds) Bioremediation: applied microbial solutions for real-world environmental cleanup. ASM Press, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pieper DH, Reineke W (2000) Engineering bacteria for bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Prakash D, Verma S, Bhatia R, Tiwar BN (2011) Risks and precautions of genetically modified organisms. Int Scholarly Res Not 2011:13pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Qin J, Rosen BP, Zhang Y, Wang GJ, Franke S, Rensing C (2006) Arsenic detoxification and evolution of trimethylarsine gas by a microbial arsenite Sadenosylmethionine methyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:2075–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ramos JL, Mermod N, Timmis KN (1987) Regulatory circuits controlling transcription of TOL plasmid operon encoding meta-cleavage pathway for degradation of alkylbenzoates by Pseudomonas. Mol Microbiol 1:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Reeves R, Baker A (2000) Metal accumulating plants. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 193–229Google Scholar
  97. Rojo F, Pieper DH, Engesser KH, Knackmuss HJ, Timmis KN (1987) Assemblage of ortho cleavage route for simultaneous degradation of chloro- and methylaromatics. Science 238:1395–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Roy M, Giri AK, Dutta S, Mukherjee P (2015) Integrated phytobial remediation for sustainable management of arsenic in soil and water. Environ Int 75:180–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rugh CL, Wilde D, Stack NM, Thompson DM, Summer AO, Meagher RB (1996) Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified bacterial merA gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3182–3187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Salt D, Smith R, Raskin I (1998) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:643–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sandermann H (1994) Higher plant metabolism of xenobiotics: the ‘green liver’ concept. Pharmacogenetics 4:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sasaki Y, Minakawa T, Miyazaki A, Silver S, Kusano T (2005) Functional dissection of a mercuric ion transporter Mer C from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:1394–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Saxena G, Bharagava RN (2015) Persistent organic pollutants and bacterial communities present during the treatment of tannery wastewater. In: Chandra R (ed) Environmental waste management, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 217–247.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b19243-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Saxena G, Bharagava RN (2016) Ram Chandra: advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18(3):979–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Saxena G, Bharagava RN (2017) Organic and inorganic pollutants in industrial wastes, their ecotoxicological effects, health hazards and bioremediation approaches. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 23–56.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Saxena G, Chandra R, Bharagava RN (2016) Environmental pollution, toxicity profile and treatment approaches for tannery wastewater and its chemical pollutants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 240:31–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2015_5009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Saxena G, Purchase D, Mulla SI, Saratale GD, Bharagava RN (2019) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated sites: eco-environmental concerns, field studies, sustainability issues, and future prospects. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2019_24Google Scholar
  108. Sayler GS, Ripp S (2000) Field applications of genetically modified bacteria for bioremediation processes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:286–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Schue M, Dover LG, Besra GS, Parkhill J, Brown NL (2009) Sequence and analysis of a plasmid encoded mercury resistance operon from Mycobacterium marinum identifies MerH, a new mercuric ion transporter. J Bacteriol 19:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Shim D, Kim S, Choi YI, Song WY, Park P, Youk ES, Jeong SC, Martinoia E, Noh EW, Lee Y (2013) Tansgenic poplar trees expressing yeast cadmium factor 1 exhibit the characteristics necessary for the phytoremediation of mine tailing soil. Chemosphere 90:1478–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shukla KP, Singh NK, Sharma S (2010) Bioremediation: developments. Curr Pract Perspect Genet Eng Biotechnol J 1–20Google Scholar
  112. Singh S, Mulchandani A, Chen W (2008) Highly selective and rapid arsenic removal by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli cells expressing Fucus vesiculosus metallothionein. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2924–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Singh S, Korripally P, Vancheeswaran R, Eapen S (2011) Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants expressing a fungal copper transporter gene show enhanced acquisition of copper. Plant Cell Rep 30:1929–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sone Y, Nakamura R, Pan-Hou H, Sato MH, Itoh I, Kiyono M (2013) Increase methylmercury accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana expressing bacterial broad-spectrum mercury transporter MerE. AMB Express 3:52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Sriprang R, Hayashi M, Ono H, Takagi M, Hirata K, Murooka Y (2003) Enhanced accumulation of Cd2+ by a Mesorhizobium sp. transformed with a gene from Arabidopsis thaliana coding for phytochelatin synthase. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:179–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Strong LC, McTavish H, Sadowsky MJ, Wackett LP (2000) Field-scale remediation of atrazine-contaminated soil using recombinant Escherichia coli expressing atrazine chlorohydrolase. Environ Microbiol 2:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Suresh B, Ravishankar GA (2004) Phytoremediation – a novel and promising approach for environmental clean-up. Crit Rev Biotechnol 24:97–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Timmis KN, Pieper DH (1999) Bacteria designed for bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol 17:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tozzini AC (2000) Semi-quantitative detection of genetically modified grains based on CaMv 35S promoter amplification. Electron J Biotechnol 0717-3458Google Scholar
  120. Valls M, de Lorenzo V (2002) Exploiting the genetic and biochemical capacities of bacteria for the remediation of heavy metal pollution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Valls M, Atrian S, de Lorenzo V, Fernandez LA (2000) Engineering a mouse metallothionein on the cell surface of Ralstonia eutropha CH34 for immobilization of heavy metals in soil. Nat Biotechnol 18:661–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Van AB (2009) Transgenic plants for enhanced phytoremediation of toxic explosives. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Van Dillewijn P, Couselo JL, Corredoira E, Delgado E, Wittich RM, Ballester A (2008) Bioremediation of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene by bacterial nitroreductase expressing transgenic aspen. Environ Sci Technol 42:7405–7410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Verma JP, Jaiswal DK (2016) Book review: advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste. Front Microbiol 6:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Vidali M (2001) Bioremediation An overview. Pure Appl Chem 73(7):1163–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wang L, Samac DA, Shapir N, Wackett LP, Vance CP, Olszewski NE, Sadowsky MJ (2005) Biodegradation of atrazine in transgenic plants expressing a modified bacterial atrazine chlorohydrolase (atzA) gene. Plant Biotechnol J 3:475–486SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wernick I, Themelis N (1998) Recycling metals for the environment. Annu Rev Energy Environ 23:465–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wijnhoven S, Leuven R, Van Der Velde G, Jungheim G, Koelemij E, De Vries F (2007) Heavy-metal concentrations in small mammals from a diffusely polluted floodplain: importance of species- and location-specific characteristics. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wu CH, Wood TK, Mulchandani A, Chen W (2006) Engineering plant-microbe symbiosis for rhizoremediation of heavy metals. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1129–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wu G, Kang H, Zhang X, Shao H, Chu L, Ruan C (2010) A critical review on the bio-removal of hazardous heavy metals from contaminated soils: issues, progress, eco-environmental concerns and opportunities. J Hazard Mater 14:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Yang H, Nairn J, Ozias-Akins P (2003) Transformation of peanut using a modified bacterial mercuric ion reductase gene driven by an actin promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Physiol 160:945–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Yuan CG, Lu XF, Qin J, Rosen BP, Le XC (2008) Volatile arsenic species released from Escherichia coli expressing the AsIII S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase gene. Environ Sci Technol 42:3201–3206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zhan Y, Liu J, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Gong T, Liu Y, Wang J, Ge Y (2013) Enhanced Phytoremediation of mixed heavy metal (mercury)-organic pollutants (trichloroethylene) with transgenic alfalfa co-expressing glutathione s-transferase and human P450 2E1. J Hazard Mater 260:1100–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Zhu Y, Pilon-Smits EA, Tarun AS, Weber SU, Jouanin L, Terry N (1999) Cadmium tolerance and accumulation in Indian mustard is enhanced by overexpressing g-glutamylcysteine synthetase. Plant Physiol 121:1169–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaurav Saxena
    • 1
  • Roop Kishor
    • 1
  • Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale
    • 2
  • Ram Naresh Bharagava
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Bioremediation and Metagenomics Research (LBMR), Department of Microbiology (DM)Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar (Central) UniversityLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Department of Food Science and BiotechnologyDongguk University-SeoulGoyang-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations