Advertisement

A Feasible Method to Implement Shared Decision Making in Routine Practice

  • Jun-xian WangEmail author
  • Zi-xian Liu
  • Li-jun Liang
Conference paper

Abstract

The paper proposes a method to incorporate the patient, physician, and general people into the shared decision making system, the method is a combination of conjoint analysis and fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Firstly, The preferences of various decision makers are analyzed by the conjoint analysis, secondly, the decision makers evaluate the treatment regimens with the triangular fuzzy number, then the method of ideal point is used to obtain the ideal treatment regimen, finally the relapsed or refractory chronic lymphoblastic leukemia treatment decision making is taken as an example of this method’s specific application, the results show that the applicability of the method proposed by the paper is strong.

Keywords

Conjoint analysis Fuzzy triangular number Multi-attribute group decision making Preference Shared decision making 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71171142) and Tianjin Philosophy and Social Sciences Research Planning Project (No. TJGL16-013Q).

References

  1. 1.
    M.J. Barry, S. Edgman-Levitan, Shared decision making–pinnacle of patient-centered care. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(9), 780–781 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Elwyn, S. Laitner, A. Coulter, E. Walker, P. Watson, R. Thomson, Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 341, c5146 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Charles, A. Gafni, T. Whelan, Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc. Sci. Med. 44(5), 681–692 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.M. Stiggelbout, A.H. Pieterse, J.CJ.M. Haes, Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ. Couns. 98(10), 1172 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Elwyn, D.L. Frosch, S. Kobrin, Implementing shared decision making: consider all the consequences. Implement. Sci. 11(1), 114 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.J. Barry, Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice. Ann. Intern. Med. 136(2), 127–135 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Q. Zeng-Treitler, B. Gibson, B. Hill, J. Butler, C. Christensen, D. Redd et al., The effect of simulated narratives that leverage EMR data on shared decision making: a pilot study. BMC Res. Notes 9(1), 359 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.L. Frosch, B.W. Moulton, R.M. Wexler, M. Holmes-Rovner, R.J. Volk, C.A. Levin, Shared decision making in the united states: policy and implementation activity on multiple fronts. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 105(4), 305–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Fullwood, A. Kennedy, A. Rogers, M. Eden, C. Gardner, J. Protheroe et al., Patients’ experiences of shared decision making in primary care practices in the United Kingdom. Med. Decis. Mak. 33(1), 26–36 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Chewning, C.L. Bylund, B. Shah, N.K. Arora, J.A. Gueguen, G. Makoul, Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ. Couns. 86(1), 9–18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Say, M. Murtagh, R. Thomson, Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ. Couns. 60(2), 102–114 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.G. Dolan, Shared decision making—transferring research into practice: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Patient Educ. Couns. 73(3), 418–425 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Landfeldt, J. Eriksson, S. Ireland, P. Musingarimi, C. Jackson, E. Tweats, M. Gaudig, Patient, physician, and general population preferences for treatment characteristics in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a conjoint analysis. Leuk. Res. 40, 17–23 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Z.S. Xu, J. Chen, An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Inf. Sci. 177(1), 248–263 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Management and EconomicsTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.School of ManagementTianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations