Advertisement

Model Systematic Errors in the Annual Cycle of Monsoon: Inferences from Process-Based Diagnostics

  • H. AnnamalaiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)

Abstract

Forecasting monsoon rainfall using dynamical climate models has met with little success, partly due to models’ inability to represent the monsoon precipitation annual cycle accurately. Here, we review and examine the nature and dynamical causes of their biases. We discuss the coupled nature of the monsoon annual cycle from observations and then present errors in multi-model-mean, climatological fields of ocean–atmosphere variables determined from CMIP5. We argue that in CMIP-era models, there is a spatial redistribution in the organization of convection, and precipitation biases are longitudinally oriented with “wet-west” and “dry-east” over the tropical Indian Ocean, with wet (dry) biases prominent over the climatological dry (wet) regions. Irrespective of resolutions and varied physical parameterizations employed in CMIP-era models, the robustness in the biases across the suite of models suggests that multiple processes and their interactions lead to these persistent errors. We review recent literature that addressed the source(s) of model errors and indicate the importance of examining both atmospheric and oceanic fast processes. After discussing the unique nature of observed convection peak during May over the western Indian Ocean, we demonstrate through idealized experiments, how errors in the representation of ocean–atmosphere feedbacks along the equatorial Indian Ocean impact monsoon precipitation errors. We apply process-based diagnostics to identify the relative role of moist and radiative processes and show how systematic errors in certain parameterizations could anchor model biases in precipitation. Despite devoted efforts by the model development teams, persistence of model errors leads us to ask: are there fundamental limits to realistically simulating the monsoon annual cycle? Can a concerted observational and modeling effort enhance models’ fidelity in simulating the monsoon? We summarize the pertinent issues on modeling, and limitations on observations to constrain model physics, and stress the need for coordinated activities across diagnostics, modeling, and observational personnel.

Keywords

Systematic errors Processes representation Fundamental limits 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant 1460742. The author also acknowledges the financial support provided by the Indian Monsoon Mission and JAMSTEC. Jan Hafner is thanked for his assistance with diagnostics.

References

  1. Abhik, S., R.P.M. Krishna, M. Mahakur, M. Ganai, P. Mukhopadhyay, and J. Dudhia. 2017. Revised cloud processes to improve the mean and intraseasonal variability of Indian summer monsoon in climate forecast system: Part 1. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 9: 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ms000819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annamalai, H. 2010. Moist dynamical linkage between the equatorial Indian Ocean and the South Asian monsoon trough. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 67, 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annamalai, H., and K.R. Sperber. 2005. Regional heat sources and the active and break phases of boreal summer intraseasonal (30–50 day) variability. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 62: 2726–2748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Annamalai, H., P. Liu, and S.P. Xie. 2005. Southwest Indian Ocean SST variability: Its local effect and remote influence on Asian Monsoons. Journal of Climate 18: 4150–4167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Annamalai, H., B. Taguchi, J.P. McCreary, M. Nagura, and T. Miyama. 2017. Systematic errors in south Asian monsoon simulation: Importance of Equatorial Indian Ocean processes. Journal of Climate 30 (19): 8159–8178.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0573.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Annamalai, H., M. Nagura, and K. Richards. 2018. Indian Ocean and South-Asian monsoon: Upper-ocean processes relevant to monsoon annual cycle. A chapter in IndOOS Review, Jakarta, March 2018.Google Scholar
  7. Back, L.E., and C.S. Bretherton. 2006. Geographic variability in the export of moist static energy and vertical motion profiles in the tropical Pacific. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L17810.Google Scholar
  8. Back, L.E., and C.S. Bretherton. 2009. On the relationship between SST gradients, boundary layer winds, and convergence over the tropical oceans. Journal of Climate 22: 4182–4196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boos, W.R., and J.V. Hurle. 2013. Thermodynamic bias in the multi-model mean boreal summer monsoon. Journal of Climate 26: 2279–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bretherton, C. 2007. Challenges in numerical modeling of tropical circulations. In The global circulation of the atmosphere, ed. T. Schneider and A.H. Sobel, 302–330. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bretherton, C.S., M.E. Peters, and L.E. Back. 2004. Relationships between water vapor path and precipitation over the tropical oceans. Journal of Climate 17: 1517–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bush, S.J., et al. 2015. The effect of increased convective entrainment on Asian monsoon biases in the Met UM general circulation model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 141: 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charney, J.G., and J. Shukla. 1981. Monsoon predictability. In Monsoon dynamics, ed. Lighthill and R.P. Pearce, 99–109. Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  14. Del Sole, T., and J. Shukla. 2002. Linear prediction of Indian monsoon rainfall. Journal of Climate 15: 3645–3658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goswami, B.B., R.P.M. Krishna, P. Mukhopadhyay, M. Khairoutdinov, and B.N. Goswami. 2015. Simulation of the Indian summer monsoon in the superparameterized Climate Forecast System version 2: Preliminary results. Journal of Climate 28 (22): 8988–9012.  https://doi.org/10.1175/837JCLI-D-14-00607.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, N.E., and T.P. Barnett. 1987. Sea surface temperature, surface wind divergence, and convection over the tropical oceans. Science 238: 657–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Han, W., J.P. McCreary, D.L.T. Anderson, and A.J. Mariano. 1999. Dynamics of the eastern surface jets in the equatorial Indian Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography 29: 2191–2209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanf, F., and H. Annamalai. 2018. Assessing monsoon biases in a climate model: Sensitivity to entrainment. Journal of Climate (revised).Google Scholar
  19. Hoskins, B.J., and M.J. Rodwell. 1995. A model of the Asian summer monsoon. Part I: The global scale. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 52: 1329–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joseph, P.V. 1990. Warm pool over the Indian Ocean and monsoon onset. Tropical Ocean-Atmosphere Newsletter (Winter): 1–5.Google Scholar
  21. Klinker, E., and P.D. Sardesmukh. 1992. The diagnosis of mechanical dissipation in the atmosphere from large-scale balance requirements. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 49: 608–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levine, R.C., A.G. Turner, D. Marathayil, and G.M. Martin. 2013. The role of northern Arabian Sea surface temperature biases in CMIP5 model simulations and future projections of Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Climate Dynamics 41: 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin, et al. 2012. TWP-ICE global atmospheric model intercomparison: Convection responsiveness and resolution impact. Journal of Geophysical Research 117: D09111.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017018.Google Scholar
  24. Lindzen, R.S., and S. Nigam. 1987. On the role of sea surface temperature gradients in forcing low-level winds and convergence in the tropics. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 44: 2418–2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lukas, R., and E.J. Lindstorm. 1991. The mixed layer of the western equatorial Pacific Ocean. Journal Geophysical Research 96: 3343–3357.  https://doi.org/10.1029/90jc01951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma, H.-Y., et al. 2014. On the correspondence between mean forecast errors and climate errors in CMIP5 models. Journal of Climate 27: 1781–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, G.M., S.F. Milton, C.A. Senior, M.E. Brooks, S. Ineson, T. Reichler, and J. Kim. 2010. Analysis and reduction of systematic errors through a seamless approach to modeling weather and climate. Journal of Climate 23: 5933–5957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Masson, S., C. Menkes, P. Delecluse, and J.-P. Boulanger. 2003. Impacts of salinity on the eastern Indian Ocean during the termination of the fall Wyrtki Jet. Journal of Geophysical Research 108: 3067. ( https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jc000833).
  29. McCreary, J.P., P.K. Kundu, and R. Molinari. 1993. A numerical investigation of dynamics, thermodynamics and mixed-layer processes in the Indian Ocean. Progress in Oceanography 31: 181–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagura, M., et al. 2013. Longitudinal biases in the Seychelles Dome simulated by 35 ocean-atmosphere coupled general circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jc008352.Google Scholar
  31. Nagura, M., J.P. McCreary, and H. Annamalai. 2018. Origins of coupled model biases in the Arabian Sea climatological state. Journal of Climate 31 (5): 2005–2029.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0417.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neale, R.B., J.H. Richter, and M. Jochum. 2008. The impact of convection on ENSO: From a delayed oscillator to a series of events. Journal of Climate 21: 5904–5924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neelin, J.D., and I.M. Held. 1987. Modeling tropical convergence based on the moist static energy budget. Monthly Weather Review 115: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neelin, J.D., and H. Su. 2005. Moist teleconnection mechanisms for the tropical South American and Atlantic sector. Journal of Climate 18: 3928–3950.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3517.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips, T.J., and Coauthors. 2004. Evaluating parameterizations in general circulation models: Climate simulation meets weather prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 85: 1903–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Randall et al. (2007). The physical science basis. In Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, eds. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M.C. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor, and H.L. Miller, p. 996. Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rao, R.R., and R. Sivakumar. 2000. Seasonal variability of near-surface thermal structure and heat budget of the mixed layer of the tropical Indian Ocean from a new global ocean temperature climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research 105: 985–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raymond, D.J. 2000. Thermodynamic control of tropical rainfall. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 126: 889–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raymond, D.J., S.L. Sessions, A.H. Sobel, and Z. Fuchs. 2009. The mechanics of gross moist stability. JAMES 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
  40. Rodwell, M.J., and T.N. Palmer. 2007. Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 133: 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sandeep, S., and R.S. Ajayamohan. 2014. Origin of cold bias over the Arabian Sea in climate models. Scientific Reports 4: 6403.Google Scholar
  42. Seo, H., S.P. Xie, R. Murtugudde, M. Jochum, and A.J. Miller. 2009. Seasonal effects of Indian Ocean freshwater forcing in a regional coupled model. Journal of Climate 22: 6577–6596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sengupta, D., and M. Ravichandran. 2001. Oscillations of Bay of Bengal sea surface temperature during the 1998 summer monsoon. Geophysical Research Letters 28: 2033–2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shenoi, S.S.C., D. Shankar, and S.R. Shetye. 2002. Differences in heat budgets of the near surface Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal: Implications for the summer monsoon. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (C6): 3052.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sobel, A., J. Nilsson, and L.M. Polvani. 2001. The weak temperature gradient approximation and balanced tropical moisture waves. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 58: 3650–3665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sperber, K.R., et al. 2013. The Asian monsoon: An intercomparison of CMIP3vs CMIP5 simulations of the late 20th century. Climate Dynamics 41 (9–10): 2711–2744.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1607-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stephens, G.L., S.V. Heever, and L. Pakula. 2008. Radiative-convective feedbacks in idealized states of radiative-convective equilibrium. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65 (3989): 3916.Google Scholar
  48. Su, H., and J.D. Neelin. 2002. Teleconnection mechanisms for tropical Pacific descent anomalies during El Niño. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 59: 2694–2712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, K.E., R.J. Stouffer, and G.A. Meehl. 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 93: 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tozuka, T., T. Yokoi, and T. Yamagata. 2010. A modeling study of interannual variations of the Seychelles Dome. Journal Geophysical Research 115: C04005.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jc005547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xie, S.P., H. Annamalai, F. Schott, and J.P. McCreary. 2002. Structure and mechanisms of South Indian Ocean climate variability. Journal of Climate 15: 864–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yanai, M., S. Esbensen, and J.H. Chu. 1973. Determination of bulk properties of tropical cloud clusters from large-scale heat and moisture budgets. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 60: 611–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wyrtki, K. 1973. An equatorial jet in the Indian Ocean. Science 181: 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao, et al. 2018. The GFDL global atmosphere and land Model AM4.0/LM4.0: 2. Model description, sensitivity studies, tuning strategies. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 10: 735–769.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OceanographyInternational Pacific Research Center, IPRC/SOEST, University of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations