Soft Computing and Signal Processing pp 57-66 | Cite as
A Modified Firefly Swarm Optimization Technique to Improve the Efficiency of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks
Abstract
The sensor nodes in UWSNs do not remain within the confined zone due to water currents. The sensor nodes have to be clustered in order to enable them to send and receive the collected data in their deployed environment. Clustering of sensor nodes helps the network in reducing transmission time. A grouping algorithm derived from the firefly swarm optimization (FSO) is tested to improve the stability and proximity of the underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs). The firefly algorithm helps in keeping the sensor nodes intact and produces fewer failures in network connectivity. The simulation results are convincing, and the same has been given at the end.
Keywords
Clustering Firefly Stability Sensor networks OptimizationReferences
- 1.Salehian, S., Subraminiam, S.K.: Unequal clustering by improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) in wireless sensor network. In: The 2015 International Conference on Soft Computing and Software Engineering (SCSE 2015). Procedia Comput. Sci. 62, 403–409Google Scholar
- 2.Ouchitachen, H., Hair, A., Idrissi, N.: Improved multi-objective weighted clustering algorithm in wireless sensor network. Egypt. Inform. J. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2016.06.001
- 3.Amine, D., Nasr-Eddine, B., Abdelhamid, L.: A distributed and safe weighted clustering algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 52, 641–646 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Gupta, V., Pandey, R.: An improved energy aware distributed unequal clustering protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 19, 1050–1058 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Perrig, A., Szewczyk, R., Wen, V., Culler, D.E., Tygar, J.D.: SPINS: security protocols for sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 8(5), 521–534 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D.E., Pister, K.: System architecture directions for networked sensors. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. ACM Press, New York, pp. 93–104 (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Carman, D.W., Krus, P.S., Matt, B.J.: Constraints and approaches for distributed sensor network security. Technical Report 00-010, NAI Labs, Network Associates Inc., Glenwood, MD (2000)Google Scholar
- 8.Mahajan, S., Malhotra, J., Sharma, S.: An energy balanced QoS based cluster head selection strategy for WSN. Egypt. Inform. J. 15, 189–199 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Viswa Bharathy, A.M., Basha, A.M.: A multi-class classification MCLP model with particle swarm optimization for network intrusion detection. In: Sadhana: Academy Proceedings in Engineering Science, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 631–640 (2017)Google Scholar
- 10.Viswa Bharathy, A.M., Basha, A.M.: A hybrid intrusion detection system cascading support vector machine and fuzzy logic. World Appl. Sci. J. 35(1), 104–109 (2016)Google Scholar
- 11.Viswa Bharathy, A.M., Basha, A.M.: A hybrid network intrusion detection technique using variable multiplicative K-means with self-organising PSO. Middle East J. Sci. Res. 24(12), 3812–3819 (2016)Google Scholar
- 12.Kingsly, S.R., Viswa Bharathy, A.M.: Secure neighbor discovery scheme for dynamic clustering in manet. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 3(4) (2015)Google Scholar
- 13.Sen, J.: A survey on wireless sensor network security. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur. (IJCNIS) 1(2), 55–78 (2009)Google Scholar
- 14.Gowrishankar, S., Basavaraju, T.G., Manjaiah, D.H., Sarkar, S.K.: Issues in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2008, vol IGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bakr, B.A., Lilien, L.T.: Extending lifetime of wireless sensor networks by management of spare nodes. Procedia Comput. Sci. 34, 493–498 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sengupta, D., Roy, A.: A literature survey of topology control and its related issues in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. 10, 19–27 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Taherian, M., Karimi, H., Kashkooli, A.M., Esfahanimehr, A., Jafta, T., Jafarabad, M.: The design of an optimal and secure routing model in wireless sensor networks by using PSO algorithm. Procedia Comput. Sci. 73, 468–473 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gherbi, C., Aliouat, Z., Benmohammed, M.: A load-balancing and self-adaptation clustering for lifetime prolonging in large scale wireless sensor networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 73, 66–75 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Krishna, K.H., Babu, Y.S., Kumar, T.: Wireless sensor network topology control using clustering. Procedia Comput. Sci. 79, 893–902 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Fan, Z., Jin, Z.: A multi-weight based clustering algorithm for wireless sensor network. PRZEGLĄD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY (Electrical Review). ISSN 0033-2097, R. 88 NR 1b/2012, 19–21Google Scholar
- 21.Abo-Zahhad, M., Ahmed, S.M., Sabor, N., Sasaki, S.: A new energy-efficient adaptive clustering protocol based on genetic algorithm for improving the lifetime and the stable period of wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Energy Inf. Commun. 5(3), 47–72 (2014)Google Scholar
- 22.Gajjar, S., Sarkar, M., Dasgupta, K.: FAMACRO: fuzzy and ant colony optimization based MAC/routing cross-layer protocol for wireless sensor networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 46, 1014–1021 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ren, Z., Chen, Y., Yao, Y., Li, Q.: Energy-efficient ring-based multi-hop clustering routing for WSNs. In: IEEE Fifth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, pp. 14–17 (2012)Google Scholar
- 24.Krishna, H., Babu, Y.S., Kumar, T.: Wireless sensor network topology control using clustering. Procedia Comput. Sci. 79, 893–902 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Amine, D., Nassreddine, B., Bouabdellah, K.: Energy efficient and safe weighted clustering algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks. In: The 9th International Conference on Future Networks and Communications (FNC 2014). Procedia Comput. Sci. 34, 63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar