Advertisement

Disarmament, Arms Control and Arms Race

  • Ajey LeleEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 132)

Abstract

In coming years, various emerging and/or disruptive technologies and various other technological innovations happening from time to time are expected to get refined, adapted and used at a remarkable rate by military establishments globally. The rapidity in innovation and development is also expected to bring in the ethos of scientific uncertainty. Owing to the dynamic developments taking place in the fields of modelling and simulation and virtual reality technologies, the need for testing of weapons could reduce. This could lead faster induction of certain technologies in the armed forces and leave very little time with the mankind to first understand and then improve upon the limitations of rapidly developing technologies. All this could pose significant challenges to the systems of governance both at regional and global levels.

References

  1. 1.
    Goldblast, J. (ed.): Non-Proliferation: The Why and Wherefore, SIPRI, p. 3. Taylor & Francis, London (1985)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    General Assembly, Official Records: Tenth Special Session Supplement No. 4 (A/S-10/4). https://s3.amazonaws.com/unoda-web/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/A-S10-4.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2018
  3. 3.
    New technologies and the qualitative arms race, 1988. Working Paper submitted by India at the Third Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly devoted to disarmament. Available at https://fas.org/nuke/guide/india/doctrine/880000-disarm.htm. Accessed 28 June 2018
  4. 4.
    Guile, B.R. (ed.): Information Technologies and Social Transformation. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allan, M.D. (ed.): Arms and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 23, pp. 23–27. Oxford University Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shulman, C.: Arms control and intelligence explosions. Paper presented at the 7th European conference on computing and philosophy (ECAP), Bellaterra, Spain, 2–4 July 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    An open letter to the united nations convention on certain conventional weapons. https://www.dropbox.com/s/g4ijcaqq6ivq19d/2017%20Open%20Letter%20to%20the%20United%20Nations%20Convention%20on%20Certain%20Conventional%20Weapons.pdf?dl=0. Accessed 23 January, 2018
  8. 8.
    In 2015, Prof. Walsh spearheaded a similar letter calling for collective action to curb autonomous weapons which was signed by, amongst others, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak and renowned physicist Stephen Hawking. Please refer https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/design/sydney-professor-and-elon-musk-lead-call-for-united-nations-to-ban-lethal-autonomous-weapons/news-story/ffe86044e831729fe4466b9dbfe170d7. Accessed 2 July 2018
  9. 9.
    Perspectives on lethal autonomous weapon systems: 7–19. UNODA occasional papers No. 30, Nov 2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foradori, P. (ed.): Arms Control and Disarmament: 50 Years of Experience in Nuclear Education, p. 2; Allan, M.D. (ed.): Arms and Artificial Intelligence, p. 23. Oxford University Press, New York. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Warnke, P.: The effect of new technologies on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament: Artificial intelligence, hypersonic technology and outer space. https://www.un.org/disarmament/update/the-effect-of-new-technologies-on-nuclear-non-proliferation-and-disarmament-artificial-intelligence-hypersonic-technology-and-outer-space/. Accessed 30 June 2018 (2017)
  12. 12.
    Brockmann, K., Bauer, S.: 3D printing and missile technology controls. SIPRI Background Paper, Nov 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walther, Gerald: Printing insecurity? The security implications of 3d-printing of weapons. Sci. Eng. Ethics 21, 1435–1445 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arnold, A.: Blockchain: a new aid to nuclear export controls? https://thebulletin.org/2017/10/blockchain-a-new-aid-to-nuclear-export-controls/. Accessed 24 May 2018 (2017)
  15. 15.
    Report of the UN Secretary-General—Uniting Against Terrorism: Recommendations for a Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, 27 Apr 2006, pp. 52–57Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chyba, C.F.: Biotechnology and the Challenge to Arms Control. Arms Control Today. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2006_10/BioTechFeature. Accessed 12 June 2018
  17. 17.
    Zilinskas, R.A., Mauger, P.: Biotechnology E-commerce: a disruptive challenge to biological arms control. CNS Occasional Paper No. 21, Middlebury Institute of International Studies, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Intriljgator, M.D., Brito, D.L.: Arms races, defence and faux. Economics 11, 45–54 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yildirim, J., Öcal, N.: Arms race and economic growth: the case of India and Pakistan. Def Peace Econ 17(1), 37–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glaser, C.L., Kaufman, C.: What is the offense-defense balance and can we measure it? Int Secur 22(4), 39–44 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Majumdar, D. Why 3D printing could be the key to winning the hypersonic arms race. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/why-3d-printing-could-be-the-key-winning-the-hypersonic-arms-25240. Accessed 6 July 2018 (2018)
  23. 23.
    A 3D printing arms race between China and the U.S.A., 2017. https://www.evolv3dlabs.com/3d-printing-arms-race-china-u-s/. Accessed 7 July 2018
  24. 24.
    Lucas, L., Waters, R.: The AI arms race: China and U.S. compete to dominate big data. https://www.ft.com/content/e33a6994-447e-11e8-93cf-67ac3a6482fd. Accessed 10 May 2018 (2018)
  25. 25.
    Zhang, B.: China’s Assertive Nuclear Posture: State Security in an Anarchic International Order, pp. 1–203. Routledge (2015). Haynes, S.T.: Anarchy and the new arms race. Nonproliferation Rev 23, 3–4, 513–518 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Defence Studies and AnalysesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations