Advertisement

“Are Landside–Airside Boundaries Cultural Mirrors?”: Reinventions, Innovations and Society

  • Victor MarquezEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the author develops two themes: First, he draws the line between airport reinventions and airport innovations and thus helps the reader by clearing up any blurriness on this matter created by discussing the previous case studies. Second, and foremost, he tries to answer the following question: Are boundaries repeatable pieces of a mechanism, or are they autonomous entities, subject to the absorbing of cultural practices? In the Sect 1, “On Airport Reinventions,” the author discusses how congestion can be highlighted among the causes that prompted full airport reinventions. The Sect. 2, “On Airport Innovations,” speaks of historical changes, departing from what is commonly known in airport planning as the standard, “linear model.” The author presents two iconic cases in which airport layout ideas were introduced that were perceived as new: the 1974 Terminal 1 at Paris’s Charles de Gaulle Airport and the 1960 Pan Am Terminal 2 at New York’s Idlewild Airport (later known as JFK). Last, in Sect. 3 Marquez argues that airports are not clones, or even repeatable copies, as many people may think. The author supports this claim by showing that the frontier between the airside and the landside captures many cultural differences that make each airport unique.

References

Interviews

  1. Dunlay, W. J. (2008, March 8). Transcript. Personal interview with Bill Dunlay with Leigh Fisher & Associates.Google Scholar

Publications

  1. Aéroports de Paris. (2004). Roissy—Charles de Gaulle: 30 ans de déceloppement économique et de partenariat local. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Aéroports de Paris. (2009). Terminal 1 at Paris—Charles de Gaulle airport celebrates 35 years and adopts a new image. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Block, J. V. (1968, December 2). International airport planning as influenced by aircraft development. London: Lecture to the Royal Aeronautical Society.Google Scholar
  4. Block, J. V. (1971). Airports and environment. Edition Aéroports de Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Brancker, J. W. S. (1977). IATA and what it does. Leiden, Netherlands: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
  6. Froesch, C., & Prokosch, W. (1946). Airport planning. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodman, W. C. (2000). Transportation by air: Job growth moderates from stellar rates. Aviation Employment.Google Scholar
  8. Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems: The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. L’ ECLAT rédaction. (2011, February 13). Charles de Gaulle Terminal 1: l’aérogare mal-aimée. L’ECLAT Regards du Actualité.Google Scholar
  10. Levine, M. E. (2008). Airport congestion: When theory meets reality. NELLCO Legal Scholarship Repository, New York University.Google Scholar
  11. Onnée, J.-F. (2004, December). Paris—Charles de Gaulle Airport: A critique of the development of France’s first airport. Term paper for MIT Airport Systems Planning, Design and Management.Google Scholar
  12. Poh, E. [Assistant Director of ICAO Affairs]. (2007, April 9–13). Lecture on Strategic Airport Management Programme, Airport Planning and Terminal Design.Google Scholar
  13. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Salter, M. B. (2008a). The global airport: Managing space, speed, and security. In M. B. Salter (Ed.), Politics at the airport. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Szurovy, G. (2003). The American airport. St. Paul, MN: MBI.Google Scholar
  16. Washington National Airport. (1941, October). Architectural Record, 90(4).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations