Advertisement

New Progress of Goal-Directed Fluid Resuscitation for Septic Shock

  • Jing-Lun Liu
  • Dan Zhang
Chapter

Abstract

Fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of resuscitation in patients with septic shock. In 2001, Rivers presented the early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) strategies to direct intravenous infusion for septic shock patients. As a result, EGDT was adopted by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Recently a trio of trials (ProCESS, ARISE, and ProMISe) question the continued need for all of the elements of EGDT or the need for protocolized care for patients with septic shock. Nevertheless, it is important to find the right goal for septic shock to direct fluid resuscitation. However, it must be recognized that due to the pathophysiological characteristics of septic shock, the goals of resuscitation at different stages of shock are different. Therefore, in the continuous process of the development of septic shock, we must fully understand the meaning and limitations of various parameters, so as to select the right goal to direct the fluid resuscitation therapy. In this chapter, we will introduce all kinds of parameters used to guide fluid resuscitation for septic shock patients. And some new parameters including metabolic parameters and dynamic parameters will be highlighted in this chapter.

Keywords

Fluid resuscitation Septic shock Goal-directed fluid resuscitation (EGDT) Fluid challenge Lactate (LAC) and lactate clearance Stroke volume variation (SVV) Pulse pressure variation (PPV) End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOt) Superior/inferior vena cava collapsibility index (SVC-CIIVC-CI) Tidal volume challenge 

References

  1. 1.
    Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, Liu VX, Deutschman CS, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:775–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chugh SN, Malhotra KC. Acute pericarditis in aluminium phosphide poisoning. J Assoc Physicians India. 1992;40:564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guerin L, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Monitoring volume and fluid responsiveness: from static to dynamic indicators. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013;27:177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Postelnicu R, Evans L. Monitoring of the physical exam in sepsis. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23:232–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lima A, Bakker J. Clinical assessment of peripheral circulation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21:226–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C, Wald R, Martensson J, Maiden M, et al. Acute kidney injury in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:816–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abahuje E, Munyaneza R, Riviello R, Ntirenganya F. Assessment of hemodynamic response to fluid resuscitation of patients with intra-abdominal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries. J Surg Res. 2017;218:162–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Egal M, Erler NS, de Geus HR, van Bommel J, Groeneveld AB. Targeting oliguria reversal in goal-directed hemodynamic management does not reduce renal dysfunction in perioperative and critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kramer GC, Luxon E, Wolf J, Burnett DR, Nanduri D, Friedman BC. Inaccuracy of urine output measurements due to urinary retention in catheterized patients in the burn ICU. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38:e409–409e417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Moura EB, Amorim FF, da Cruz Santana AN, Kanhouche G, de Souza Godoy LG, de Jesus Almeida L, et al. Skin mottling score as a predictor of 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:479–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunauer A, Kokofer A, Bataar O, Gradwohl-Matis I, Dankl D, Bakker J, et al. Changes in peripheral perfusion relate to visceral organ perfusion in early septic shock: a pilot study. J Crit Care. 2016;35:105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:486–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, Grelon F, Megarbane B, Anguel N, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chemla D, Antony I, Zamani K, Nitenberg A. Mean aortic pressure is the geometric mean of systolic and diastolic aortic pressure in resting humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;99:2278–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goodwin K, Abrahamowicz M, Leonard G, Perron M, Richer L, Veillette S, et al. Dietary vitamin a and visceral adiposity: a modulating role of the retinol-binding protein 4 gene. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2015;8:164–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strucinska M, Rowicka G, Dylag H, Riahi A, Bzikowska A. Dietary intake of vitamin D in obese children aged 1-3 years. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2015;66:353–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising: keep it easy. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1445; author reply 446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cherpanath TG, Hirsch A, Geerts BF, Lagrand WK, Leeflang MM, Schultz MJ, et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:981–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1935–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid. Crit Care. 2015;19:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Monnet X, Julien F, Ait-Hamou N, Lequoy M, Gosset C, Jozwiak M, et al. Lactate and venoarterial carbon dioxide difference/arterial-venous oxygen difference ratio, but not central venous oxygen saturation, predict increase in oxygen consumption in fluid responders. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1412–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, Sleeswijk VSJ, van der Klooster JM, Lima AP, et al. Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:752–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kiyatkin ME, Bakker J. Lactate and microcirculation as suitable targets for hemodynamic optimization in resuscitation of circulatory shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23:348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vincent JL, Orbegozo CD, Acheampong A. Current haemodynamic management of septic shock. Presse Med. 2016;45:e99–99e103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perner A, Gordon AC, De Backer D, Dimopoulos G, Russell JA, Lipman J, et al. Sepsis: frontiers in diagnosis, resuscitation and antibiotic therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1958–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2000;4:282–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL. The changes in pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation after a “tidal volume challenge” reliably predict fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Almesri N, Das NS, Ali ME, Gumaa K, Giha HA. Independent associations of polymorphisms in vitamin D binding protein (GC) and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genes with obesity and plasma 25OHD3 levels demonstrate sex dimorphism. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41:345–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE, Weissfeld LA, Pike F, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1683–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, et al. Protocolised Management In Sepsis (ProMISe): a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early, goal-directed, protocolised resuscitation for emerging septic shock. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:i–xxv, 1–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing-Lun Liu
    • 1
  • Dan Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care MedicineThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations