Advertisement

Durability Studies on Alkali Activated Fly Ash and GGBS-Based Geopolymer Mortars

  • G. Mallikarjuna RaoEmail author
  • C. H. Kireety
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 25)

Abstract

The present scenario in the growth of infrastructure development led to the production of high amount of concrete. Cement being the major binding material to make concrete imperatively causes the release of high amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) into atmosphere. The thought about sustainable environment arose a strong concern towards development of geopolymer concrete (GPC) that can be produced with alternative cementitious materials (Fly ash, GGBS, micro-silica, etc.). The research work presented in this paper explained the development of mortar specimens with fly ash and GGBS as binders. Nowadays, the construction industry requires the replacement of cement mortar with the novel type material, i.e. geopolymer mortar. It can be produced by using fly ash and GGBS as binders; and alkaline solution (combination of NaOH and Na2SiO3) as activator. Generally, heat treatment is necessary for curing geopolymer materials which becomes a drawback in practical applications. This study includes the development of geopolymer mortars under outdoor curing and suggests the attainment of strength with proper proportions of GGBS and Fly ash. Research work was carried out on fly ash and GGBS-based geopolymer mortar subjected to acidic solutions (Sulphuric and Nitric). The main parameters considered in this study were mass loss and strength loss. An experimental study was conducted to analyse the acid attack resistance of geopolymer mortar, considering five different mixes with varying the fly ash and GGBS (100FA-0GGBS, 75FA-25GGBS, 50FA-50GGBS, 25FA-75GGBS and 0FA-100GGBS) for different acid exposure periods of 7 and 28 days. The performance of geopolymer mortar of 100FA-0GGBS when exposed to acid environment was found to be superior compared with the other mixes.

Keywords

Mortar specimens Alkaline solution Compressive strength Outdoor curing Acid environment 

References

  1. 1.
    Davidovits, J. (1978). Synthetic mineral polymer compound of the silicoaluminate family and preparation process. US patent 4472199.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, S. D., Pu, X. C., Scrivener, K. L., & Pratt, P. L. (1995). Alkali-activated slag cement and concrete: A review of properties and problems. Advanced Cement Research, 27, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakharev, T. (2005). Durability of geopolymeric materials in sodium and Magnesium sulfate solutions. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(2005), 1233–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olivia, M., & Nora, H. R. (2011). Strength and water permeability of fly ash geopolymer concrete. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6, 70–78.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blaakmeer, J. (1994). Diabind: An alkali-activated slag fly ash binder for acid resistant concrete. Advanced Cement Based Materials, 1, 275–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Changgao, L. U., & Ruihua, L. I. (1997). Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement (Vol. 8), Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xincheng, P., Changhui, Y., & Fan, L. (1999). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference (pp. 717–722), Kiev, Ukraine.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rostami, H., & Silverstrim, T. (1996). Proceedings of the 13th Annual Pittsburgh Coal Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1074–1079).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skvara, F., & Bohunek, J. (1999). Chemical activation of substances with latent hydraulic properties. Ceramics-Silikaty, 43(3), 111–116.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (1956). IS 516-1956 (Reaffirmed 1999): Indian Standard Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thokchom, S., Dutta, D., & Ghosh, S. (2011). Effect of incorporating silica fume in fly ash geopolymers. International Journal of Civil, Environmental and Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 5(12).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sata, V., Sathonsaowaphak, A., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2012). Resistance of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar to sulfate and sulfuric acid attack. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34, 700–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringVardhaman College of EngineeringHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations