Power as Shared Weakness

  • Giovanni Navarria


The examples of the USA, Italy and China shed new light not only on the wider role citizens can now play but also on the many new hidden threats they may face in these highly mediated polities. To make sense of this dynamic, this chapter proposes a new concept of power as shared weakness. The term refers to the inability of actors (from the most powerful to the least powerful) to exercise full control over the digitally networked environment in which they operate. To understand this new paradigm of power is crucial for the success of any citizen-led initiative that attempts to resist hubris in contemporary technologically advanced societies.


  1. Abbate, Janet. 2000. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1970. On Violence. Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  4. Baran, Paul. 1964. “On Distributed Communications.” 3420-PR. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. BBC News. 2015. “China to End One-Child Policy,” October 29, sec. China.
  6. Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells, Manuel. 2013. Communication Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chin, Josh. 2012. “China Says It Suspended Officials in Forced-Abortion Case.” Wall Street Journal, June 15, sec. World News.
  9. Dahl, Robert A. 2005. Who Governs? New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1980. “Two Lectures.” In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, edited by Colin Gordon, 78–108. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1988a. “On Power.” In Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984, edited by Lawrence D. Kritzman, 96–109. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1988b. “The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In The Final Foucault, edited by James William Bernauer and David M. Rasmussen, 1–20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. Guo, Xiaoqin. 2012. State and Society in China’s Democratic Transition: Confucianism, Leninism, and Economic Development. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hindman, Matthew Scott. 2009. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khomami, Nadia. 2017. “#MeToo: How a Hashtag Became a Rallying Cry against Sexual Harassment.” The Guardian, October 20, sec. World News.
  17. Krasner, Stephen D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Margolis, Michael, and David Resnick. 2000. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace “Revolution.” Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. “Ministry of Truth: Urgent Notice on Southern Weekly.” 2013. China Digital Times, January 7.
  20. Morozov, Evgeny. 2012. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  21. Osnos, Evan. 2012. “Abortion and Politics in China.” The New Yorker, June 15.
  22. Weber, Max. 1946. “Bureaucracy.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Hans Heinrich Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 196–266. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2010. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. William Farris. 2013. Southern Weekend Constitutional Dream Global Times Article 404 Message.
  25. Yang, Guobin. 2009. The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Navarria
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterExeterUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations