Advertisement

Social Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Bio-Energy Products

  • A. Saravanan
  • P. Senthil Kumar
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes book series (EFEPP)

Abstract

The incorporation of social perspectives into standard manageability administration, instruments, and approaches had picked up noticeable quality as of late. An expanding number of activities advancing supply chain due perseverance have been situating social issues as a focal concern. Social life cycle assessment gives an all-encompassing, fundamental, and thorough apparatus to comprehend social issues that may emerge in the esteem chains of items and administrations managing human life today. For the most part the “Life cycle assessment” for bioenergy included three classifications: (i) Bioenergy creation, (ii) Environmental issues, (iii) Environmental target. This implies LCA techniques have been broadly utilized as a part of evaluating the natural effect from different sorts of bioenergy generation process. Uniquely, the greenhouse gases pulled in more consideration in this exploration territory. Because of the natural impacts, confinements, and additionally changes of the non-renewable energy sources, usage of substitution energies, for example, sustainable power sources is one of the principle arrangements keeping in mind the end goal to defeat to the vitality concerns. Among sustainable power sources, bioenergy and its related advancements is imperative for specialists and approach producers. Albeit diverse bioenergy advances have been produced, understanding the market and business possibilities of every innovation is imperative.

Keywords

Life cycle assessment Environmental impact Green house gases Bioenergy 

References

  1. Alidrisi, H., & Demirbas, A. (2016). Enhanced electricity generation by using biomass materials. Energy Sources Part A Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 38(10), 1419–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslani, A., Antila, E., & Wong, K. F. V. (2012). Comparative analysis of energy security in the Nordic countries: The role of renewable energy resources in diversification. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 4(6), 062701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aslani, A., Mazzuca-Sobczuk, T., Eivazi, S., & Bekhrad, K. (2018). Analysis of bioenergy technologies development based on life cycle and adaptation trends. Renewable Energy, 127, 1076–1086.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demirbas, A., Taylan, O., & Kaya, D. (2016). Biogas production from municipal sewage sludge (MSS). Energy Sources Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 34(23), 3027–3033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dey, S., & Bhattacharya, P. (2016). Performance analysis of biogas plant for cooking applications and cost analysis. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 8(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. Eskandary, H. (2017). Improving energy efficiency in agronomical systems. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research, 35(1), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jayakumar, P. (2009). Solar energy resources assessment handbook. In Prepared for Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology (APCTT) of the United Nations—Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) (p. 117).Google Scholar
  8. Karkoodi, S., Aslani, A., Talebi, M., Roumi, S., Abbassi, A. (2018). Transient 3D: Simulation of a flat plate solar collector in a mild climate condition. International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.4018/ijeoe.2018070105.
  9. Nasir, I. M., Ghazi, T. I. M., Omar, R., & Idris, A. (2014). Bioreactor performance in the anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: A review. Energy Sources Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 36(13), 1476–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nigam, P. S., & Singh, A. (2011). Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 37, 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nizami, A. S., Shahzad, K., Rehan, M., Ouda, O. K. M., Khan, M. Z., Ismail, I. M. I., et al. (2017). Developing waste biorefinery in Makkah: A way forward to convert urban waste into renewable energy. Applied Energy, 186(1), 186–196.Google Scholar
  12. Taylan, O., Kaya, D., Bakhsh, A. A., & Demirbas, A. (2018). Bioenergy life cycle assessment and management in energy generation. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 36, 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tran, Th. (2007). Review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment literature. In PICMET ’07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, IEEE Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349490
  14. Werle, S., & Dudziak, M. (2014). Analysis of organic and inorganic contaminants in dried sewage sludge and by-products of dried sewage sludge gasification. Energies, 7(1), 462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyRajalakshmi Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringSSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations