Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Faris Al-Fadhat
Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

This chapter provides the conclusion of the book by answering the question “How do we understand the tentative steps toward regional integration?” The core argument of the book is that beneath the recent intensification of regional economic cooperation in ASEAN lies a set of social forces that have shaped the political economies of Indonesia, and Southeast Asia in general, over more than three decades. These social forces have emerged out the internationalization of capital—where corporate profit-making activities operate beyond territorial boundaries—that has subsequently transformed national political institutions and internationalized parts of the state policy-making apparatus. It is this twin process of internationalization of capital and state that has underpinned the various projects of regional economic integration.

Bibliography

  1. Arnold, Wayne. 2006. “Ouster of Thaksin Exposes Temasek.” The New York Times, September 20. Available from: <http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/business/worldbusiness/20iht-sing.2875492.html?mcubz=1>, accessed 11 September 2017.
  2. ASEAN. 2008. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASEAN. 2015. A Blueprint for Growth-ASEAN Economic Community 2015: Progress and Key Achievements. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.Google Scholar
  4. Bafoil, François. 2014. Emerging Capitalism in Central Europe and Southeast Asia: A Comparison of Political Economies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin, David A., ed. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Rajeswary Ampalavanar. 2006. The Rise of the Corporate Economy in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, John, and Amy Kazmin. 2007. “Thai AirAsia Eyes Shin Corp’s Airline Unit.” Financial Times, March 9. Available from: <https://www.ft.com/content/c5a38ffc-cdb4-11db-839d-000b5df10621>, accessed 11 September 2017.
  8. Chacko, Priya, and Kanishka Jayasuriya. 2017. “A Capitalising Foreign Policy: Regulatory Geographies and Transnationalised State Projects.” European Journal of International Relations (March):1–24.Google Scholar
  9. Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs. 2011. Masterplan for Acceleration and Expansion of Indonesia Economic Development. Jakarta: Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  10. Dieleman, Marleen, and Wladimir Sachs. 2008. “Reluctant Internationalization: The Case of the Salim Group.” In Ethnic Chinese in Contemporary Indonesia, edited by Leo Suryadinata. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Dumlao, Doris C. 2012. “First Pacific Plans Asean Expansion.” Inquirer.net, June 25. Available from: <http://business.inquirer.net/67171/first-pacific-plans-asean-expansion>, accessed 15 March 2017.
  12. Fukuoka, Yuki. 2012. “Politics, Business and the State in Post-Soeharto Indonesia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia No. 34 (1):80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukuoka, Yuki, and Luky Djani. 2016. “Revisiting the Rise of Jokowi: The Triumph of Reformasi or an Oligarchic Adaptation of Post-Clientelist Initiatives?” South East Asia Research No. 24 (2):204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glassman, Jim. 1999. “State Power beyond the ‘Territorial Trap’: The Internationalization of the State.” Political Geography No. 18 (6):669–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hadiz, Vedi R., and Richard Robison. 2014. “President Jokowi vs Oligarchy.” New Mandala, July 10.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hew, Denis, ed. 2007. Brick by Brick: The Building of an ASEAN Economic Community. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Hewison, Kevin. 2005. “Neo-liberalism and Domestic Capital: The Political Outcomes of the Economic Crisis in Thailand.” The Journal of Development Studies No. 41 (2):310–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hewison, Kevin, Garry Rodan, and Richard Robison. 1993. “Introduction: Changing Forms of State Power in Southeast Asia.” In Southeast Asia in the 1990s: Authoritarianism, Democracy and Capitalism, edited by Kevin Hewison, Richard Robison and Garry Rodan, 2–8. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  20. Higgins, Andrew. 2011. “Thaksin Shinawatra’s Sister is Front-Runner to Become Thai Leader.” The Washington Post, June 13. Available from: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/thaksins-sister-is-front-runner-to-become-thai-prime-minister/2011/06/05/AGAALATH_story.html?utm_term=.a6b9c3fc046e>, accessed 26 June 2017.
  21. Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2003. “Embedded Mercantilism and Open Regionalism: The Crisis of a Regional Political Project.” Third World Quarterly No. 24 (2):339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2008. “Regionalising the State: Political Topography of Regulatory Regionalism.” Contemporary Politics No. 14 (1):21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jessop, Bob. 1995. “The Regulation Approach, Governance and Post-Fordism: Alternative Perspectives on Economic and Political Change?” Economy and Society No. 24 (3):307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jessop, Bob. 2015. “Crises, Crisis-Management and State Restructuring: What Future for the State?” Policy & Politics No. 43 (4):475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, Lee. 2015. “Explaining the Failure of the ASEAN Economic Community: The Primacy of Domestic Political Economy.” The Pacific Review No. 29 (5):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, M. R. 1997. “Spatial Selectivity of the State? The Regulationist Enigma and Local Struggles over Economic Governance.” Environment and Planning A No. 29 (5):831–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kazmin, Amy. 2006. “Shinawatra Family Sells Shin Stake for $1.9bn.” Financial Times, January 23. Available from: <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/efe1e3b4-8bd8-11da-9efb-0000779e2340.html?ft_site=falcon&desktop=true#axzz4sLNHdmOS>, accessed 11 September 2017.
  29. Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Keohane, Robert O. 1993. “Institutionalist Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism, edited by David A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kompas. 2016. “Bank-bank BUMN Siap Berekspansi ke Asean.” March 27. Available from: <http://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2016/03/27/223405426/Bank-bank.BUMN.Siap.Berekspansi.ke.Asean>, accessed 4 September 2017.
  32. Lee, Liz. 2014. “Malaysia More Receptive to Asean Economic Community.” The Star Online, August 21. Available from: <http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2014/08/21/malaysia-more-ready-than-neighbours-for-asean-economic-community/>, accessed 19 June 2017.
  33. MacLeod, Gordon, and Mark Goodwin. 1999. “Reconstructing an Urban and Regional Political Economy: On the State, Politics, Scale, and Explanation.” Political Geography No. 18 (6):697–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milner, Helen. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses.” World Politics No. 44 (3):466–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitrany, David. 1966. A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
  36. Munakata, Naoko. 2006. Transforming East Asia: The Evolution of Regional Economic Integration. Tokyo and Washington, DC: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry & Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2003. Globalisation, Domestic Politics and Regionalism: The ASEAN Free Trade Area. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2012. “Trade Policy in Southeast Asia: Politics, Domestic Interests and the Forging of New Accommodations in the Regional and Global Economy.” In Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics, edited by Richard Robison, 315–329. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2017. “ASEAN during the Life of The Pacific Review: A Balance Sheet on Regional Governance and Community Building.” The Pacific Review No. 30 (6):1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. 2004. Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. 1st ed. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS).Google Scholar
  41. Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. 2009. “Thaksin’s Populism.” In Populism in Asia, edited by Kosuke Mizuno and Pasuk Phongpaichit, 66–93. Singapore and Kyoto: NUS Press & Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Plummer, Michael G., and Erik Jones, eds. 2006. International Economic Integration and Asia. Advanced Research in Asian Economic Studies. Vol. 3. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  43. Polsiri, Piruna, and Yupana Wiwattanakantang. 2006. “Thai Business Groups: Crisis and Restructuring.” In Business Groups in East Asia: Financial Crisis, Restructuring, and New Growth, edited by Sea-Jin Chang, 147–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  45. Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz. 2004. Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  46. Rodan, Garry, Kevin Hewison, and Richard Robison. 2006. “Theorising Markets in South-East Asia: Power and Contestation.” In The Political Economy of South-East Asia. Markets, Power and Contestation, edited by Garry Rodan, Kevin Hewison and Richard Robison, 1–38. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Rosser, Andrew. 2002. The Politics of Economic Liberalization in Indonesia: State, Market and Power. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
  49. Roughneen, Simon. 2016. “ASEAN is Coming Together—Slowly.” Asian Nikkei Review, September 1. Available from: <https://asia.nikkei.com/magazine/20160901-ASEAN-THE-GREAT-PUZZLE/On-the-Cover/ASEAN-is-coming-together-slowly>, accessed 29 July 2017.
  50. Shinawatra, Thaksin. 2003. “Transcript of Speech by Thaksin Shinawatra Prime Minister of Thailand at the Inauguration Ceremony of the ASEAN Business and Investment Summit (ASEAN-BIS), Nusa Dua, Bali.” ASEAN Secretariat, October 6. Available from: <http://asean.org/address-by-his-excellency-dr-thaksin-shinawatra-prime-minister-of-thailand-at-the-inauguration-ceremony-of-the-asean-business-and-investment-summit-asean-bis-nusa-dua-bali/>, accessed 26 June 2017.
  51. Soesastro, Hadi. 2006. “Regional Integration in East Asia: Achievements and Future Prospects.” Asian Economic Policy Review No. 1:215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suzuki, Wataru, and Jun Suzuki. 2015. “Exclusive Interview: Chief Sees Opportunities in Growing Populations, E-commerce.” Nikkei Asian Review, September 24. Available from: <http://asia.nikkei.com/magazine/20150924-The-REBIRTH-of-SALIM-GROUP/On-the-Cover/Exlcusive-interview-Chief-sees-opportunities-in-growing-populations-e-commerce?page=1>, accessed 25 September 2015.
  53. Tempo. 2016. “Ekspansi Bank BUMN ke Pasar ASEAN, Ini Kata Menteri Rini.” March 26. Available from: <https://m.tempo.co/read/news/2016/03/26/087757055/ekspansi-bank-bumn-ke-pasar-asean-ini-kata-menteri-rini>, accessed 4 September 2017.
  54. Tiglao, Rigoberto D. 2016. Colossal Deception: How Foreigners Control Our Telecoms Sector: A Case Study of Corruption, Cronyism and Regulatory Capture in the Philippines. Manila: Strong Republic Books & The Manila Times Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  55. Tipton, Frank B. 2009. “Southeast Asian Capitalism: History, Institutions, States, and Firms.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management No. 26 (3):401–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tsui-Auch, Lai Si. 2006. “Singaporean Business Groups: The Role of the State and Capital in Singapore Inc.” In Business Groups in East Asia: Financial Crisis, Restructuring, and New Growth, edited by Sea-Jin Chang, 94–115. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Venzon, Cliff. 2015. “Philippines Presence Provides Pillar for Growth.” Nikkei Asian Review, September 24. Available from: <http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/AC/Philippinespresenceprovidespillarforgrowth>, accessed 12 November 2016.
  58. Winters, Jeffrey. 2013. “Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia.” Indonesia No. 96 (Special Issue: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics):11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faris Al-Fadhat
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International RelationsUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaBantulIndonesia

Personalised recommendations