• Faris Al-Fadhat
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)


This study analyzes the social forces and political coalitions driving regional integration projects in Asia with a focus on ASEAN and Indonesian conglomerates. It asks which social forces, within the domestic political economy of Asian states, are driving governments to seek regional arrangements for economic governance. In particular, the book asks how the emergence, reorganization, and expansion of capitalist class have conditioned political support for regional economic integration. By addressing these issues, the study emphasizes that the wellspring of regional economic institution projects stem from the process of capitalist development and the social forces it has unleashed. The book’s aims place the social and class relations that underpin regional projects—rather than the institutions which result from them—at the center of the analysis of regional integration. The research for this account draws primarily on primary documents from archival and field research conducted by the author—including company documents and in-depth interviews, government reports and policies, and trade publications and data sources, which are supplemented with secondary sources where relevant.


  1. ASEAN. 2008. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASEAN. 2015a. ASEAN Investment Report 2015: Infrastructure Investment and Connectivity. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat & UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  3. ASEAN. 2015b. A Blueprint for Growth-ASEAN Economic Community 2015: Progress and Key Achievements. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, David A., ed. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Breslin, Shaun, and Richard Higgott. 2000. “Studying Regions: Learning from the Old, Constructing the New.” New Political Economy No. 5 (3):333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, Rajeswary Ampalavanar. 2006. The Rise of the Corporate Economy in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bryan, Richard. 1987. “The state and the Internationalisation of Capital: An Approach to Analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Asia No. 17 (3):253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chacko, Priya, and Kanishka Jayasuriya. 2017. “A Capitalising Foreign Policy: Regulatory Geographies and Transnationalised State Projects.” European Journal of International Relations (March):1–24.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, Sea-Jin, ed. 2006. Business Groups in East Asia: Financial Crisis, Restructuring, and New Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chua, Christian. 2008. Chinese Big Business in Indonesia: The State of Capital. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckstein, Harry. 2009. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts, edited by Roger Gomm, Martyn Hammersley and Peter Foster, 118–164. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukuoka, Yuki. 2012. “Politics, Business and the State in Post-Soeharto Indonesia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia No. 34 (1):80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukuoka, Yuki, and Luky Djani. 2016. “Revisiting the Rise of Jokowi: The Triumph of Reformasi or an Oligarchic Adaptation of Post-Clientelist Initiatives?” South East Asia Research No. 24 (2):204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gerring, John. 2011. “The Case Study: What It Is and What It Does.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, edited by Robert E. Goodin, 1134–1165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Glassman, Jim. 1999. “State Power beyond the ‘Territorial Trap’: The Internationalization of the State.” Political Geography No. 18 (6):669–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomez, Edmund Terence, ed. 2002. Political Business in East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics.” International Organization No. 32 (4):881–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hameiri, Shahar. 2009. “Beyond Methodological Nationalism, but Where to for the Study of Regional Governance?” Australian Journal of International Affairs No. 63 (3):430–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hettne, Björn. 2005. “Beyond the ‘New’ Regionalism.” New Political Economy No. 10 (4):543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2003. “Embedded Mercantilism and Open Regionalism: The Crisis of a Regional Political Project.” Third World Quarterly No. 24 (2):339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2008. “Regionalising the State: Political Topography of Regulatory Regionalism.” Contemporary Politics No. 14 (1):21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, Lee. 2015. “Explaining the Failure of the ASEAN Economic Community: The Primacy of Domestic Political Economy.” The Pacific Review No. 29 (5):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keohane, Robert O. 1993. “Institutionalist Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism, edited by David A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ki-moon, Ban. 2012. “Transcript of Messages by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the Anniversary of Central Asia UN Centre for Preventive Diplomacy.” United Nations, December 11. Available from: <>, accessed 26 April 2017.
  28. Lamy, Pascal. 2012. The Future of the Multilateral Trading System. Richard Snape Lecture, Melbourne, 26 November ed. Canberra: Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
  29. Lamy, Pascal. 2013. “Transcript of Speech by Secretary-General Pascal Lamy at the IISS-Oberoi Discussion Forum.” World Trade Organization, January 29. Available from: <>, accessed 26 April 2017.
  30. Milner, Helen. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses.” World Politics No. 44 (3):466–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitrany, David. 1966. A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
  32. Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2003. Globalisation, Domestic Politics and Regionalism: The ASEAN Free Trade Area. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palloix, Christian. 1977a. “Conceptualizing the Internationalization of Capital.” Review of Radical Political Economics No. 9 (2):17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palloix, Christian. 1977b. “The Self-Expansion of Capital on a World Scale.” Review of Radical Political Economics No. 9 (2):3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peter, B. Guy. 1998. Comparative politics: Theory and Methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1974. “Internationalisation of Capitalist Relations and the Nation-State.” Economy and Society No. 3 (2):145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  38. Robison, Richard. 1995. “Emergence of the Middle Class in Southeast Asia.” No. 57. Perth: Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  39. Robison, Richard, ed. 2012. Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz. 2004. Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  41. Rodan, Garry, Kevin Hewison, and Richard Robison, eds. 2006. The Political Economy of South-East Asia: Markets, Power and Contestation. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tsui-Auch, Lai Si. 2006. “Singaporean Business Groups: The Role of the State and Capital in Singapore Inc.” In Business Groups in East Asia: Financial Crisis, Restructuring, and New Growth, edited by Sea-Jin Chang, 94–115. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ulriksen, Marianne S., and Nina Dadalauri. 2016. “Single Case Studies and Theory-Testing: The Knots and Dots of the Process-Tracing Method.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology No. 19 (2):223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. UNCTAD. 2015. World Investment Report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance. Geneva: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
  45. Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. 2002. Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle Over European Integration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, Jeffrey D. 2015. “Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing Between the TPP and RCEP?” Journal of Contemporary Asia No. 45 (2):345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Winters, Jeffrey. 2013. “Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia.” Indonesia No. 96 (Special Issue: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics):11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wise, Carol. 2009. “The North American Free Trade Agreement.” New Political Economy No. 14 (1):133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wunderlich, Jens-Uwe 2007. Regionalism, Globalisation and International Order: Europe and Southeast Asia. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faris Al-Fadhat
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International RelationsUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaBantulIndonesia

Personalised recommendations