Advertisement

Comparative Study of Different Machine Learning Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

  • Aman KumarEmail author
  • M. Poonkodi
Conference paper

Abstract

One of the primary causes of disease among women is breast cancer. According to a survey, one out of every twenty-eight women in India is susceptible to breast cancer. Early detection and avoidance methods can reduce the prospects of death considerably. Three methods are available for breast cancer detection—mammography, FNA, surgical biopsy. The sensitivity of mammography varies from 65 to 79% that of FNA varies from 65 to 85%. Surgical biopsy is close to 100% but is tedious and expensive. Diagnosis of breast cancer is a noteworthy area of data mining study. In our work, a comparison among the various classifiers like logistic regression, KNN classifier, naïve Bayes, state vector machines, decision trees, random forest classifier on Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer (WDBC) dataset based on accuracy and confusion matrix is offered. In addition, it presents a combination of different classifiers by means of stacked generalization method. Different dimensionality reduction methods like least discriminant analysis and principal component analysis have been used on the dataset. All models are programmed in Python 3 using Anaconda environment.

Keywords

Breast cancer Breast cancer dataset Classification Accuracy 

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2008 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control. http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/index1.html.
  3. 3.
    G.I. Salama, M.B. Abdelhalim and Abd-elghany Zeid. Experimental Comparison for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Egypt: IEEE 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Angeline Christobel Y, Dr. Sivaprakasam. “An Empirical Comparison of Data Mining Classification Methods”. International Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol 3, No. 2. 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vapnik. V.N., “The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory”. 1st ed., Springer-Verlag. New York, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Yaun. “An Improved Naïve Bayes Text Classification Algorithm In Chinese Information Processing”. Science, pp. 267–269. 2010.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Jiawei and K. Micheline. “Data Mining- Concepts and Techniques”, Second Edition, Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier Publishers, ISBN: 978-1-55860-901-3, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zahra Nematzadeh, Roliana Ibrahim and Ali Selamat. Comparative Studies on Breast Cancer Classifications with K-Fold Cross Validations Using Machine Learning Techniques. Malaysia, UTM: IEEE 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyVadapalaniIndia

Personalised recommendations