Advertisement

Optimization of Semi-solid-Forging Parameters of A356–5TiB2 In Situ Composites Using ANSYS and DEFORM Simulation

  • S. Deepak KumarEmail author
  • D. Karthik
  • S. K. Parida
  • S. K. Jha
Conference paper

Abstract

This research work explores the application of ANSYS software to predict the tensile behavior of semi-solid-processed A356–5TiB2 in situ composites. Further, to forecast the material flow of the composites in semi-solid condition, DEFORM 3D simulations were performed. It is interesting to note from the ANSYS and DEFORM simulation analysis that the optimum parameters to achieve maximum hardness and tensile strength of semi-solid-forged A356–5TiB2 in situ composites, to be at a semi-solid-forging temperature of 585 °C, at 40% deformation which is nearly equal to a solid fraction (fs = 0.5). Thus, the effect of ANSYS and DEFORM 3D simulation software resulted in saving time and decreasing the costly trials on the shop floor.

Keywords

Semi-solid forging A356 alloy TiB2 composites DEFORM 3D simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research support provided by Central Research Facility, at Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Flemings MC. Behavior of metal alloys in the semisolid state. Metallurgical Transactions A 1991; 22: 957–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fan Z. Semisolid metal processing. International Materials Reviews 2002; 47:49–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koc M, Vazquez V, Witulski T, Altan T. Application of the finite element method to predict material flow and defects in the semi-solid forging of A356 aluminum alloys. J Mater. Proc. Tech. 1996; 59:106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jafari MR, Zebarjad SM, Kolahan F. Simulation of thixoformability of A356 aluminum alloy using finite volume method. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2007; 454–455: 558–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DEFORM-3D Software User Manual, Ver. 6.1, Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation, Columbus, Ohio, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Satheesh P, Mahesh NS, Mushib B. Development of forging process for synchronized ring through numerical simulation. Sastech Journal. 2013; 12:1–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Randhir Kumar, Singh NK, Ohdar RK, In: proc. ATCOM 2011, RDCIS SAIL, Ranchi, July 5–7, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deepak kumar S, Mandal A, Chakraborty M. Effect of Thixoforming on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of A356 Alloy and A356-5TiB2 in-situ Composite. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 2015; 68:123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deepak Kumar S, Vundavilli PR, Mantry S, Mandal A, Chakraborty M. A Taguchi optimization of cooling slope casting process parameters for production of semisolid A356 alloy and A356-5TiB2 in-situ composite feedstock. Procedia Materials Science. 2014; 5: 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deepak kumar S, Mandal A, Chakraborty M. On the age hardening behavior of thixoformed A356-5TiB2 in-situ composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2015; 636: 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Deepak Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Karthik
    • 2
  • S. K. Parida
    • 3
  • S. K. Jha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringBirla Institute of Technology MesraRanchiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Manufacturing EngineeringNational Institute of Technology JamshedpurJamshedpurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Manufacturing EngineeringNational Institute of Foundry and Forge (NIFFT)RanchiIndia

Personalised recommendations