Effects of Power Take-Off Damping and Model Scaling on the Hydrodynamic Performance of Oscillating Water Column Device
A systematic numerical investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of an oscillating water column (OWC) system for different damping values from the power take-off (PTO) device and at different model scales has been studied. Further, an experimental programme was devised with a Froude model scale of 1:12 in a shallow wave flume by representing PTO damping by varying the air orifice ratio, a/A [ratio of air orifice area (a) to plan area (A)]. In the case of numerical investigation, simulation was carried out in the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model, REEF3D. Herein, the equivalent PTO damping on the OWC chamber is represented by the porous media flow relation. First, the numerical results are validated by comparing with the laboratory measurements for five different PTO damping. Second, following the validation stage, the open-source numerical model is used to evaluate model scale effects on the hydrodynamic performance of the OWC by comparing hydrodynamic parameters of four different model scales from 1:12 to full scale. In this paper, the influence of PTO damping and model scales on the variation of pressure behind the lip wall, air pressure, and hydrodynamic efficiency is studied. The results are reported for different relative water depths. Since the air is modelled as incompressible, the effect of scaling on the hydrodynamic performance of OWC is found with negligible variation.
KeywordsOscillating water column Optimum power take-off damping Scale effects Wave amplification Hydrodynamic efficiency Air pressure
This research was funded by Norwegian Research Council (Grant No. 217622/E20) and their support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors’ are grateful for the support received from shallow wave flume facility at the Department of Ocean Engineering, IIT Madras. They also gratefully acknowledge the excellent computing facilities provided by High Performance Computing Centre of IIT Madras and NOTUR (No. NN2620K) of Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
- 1.Ravindran M, Koola PM (1991) Energy from sea waves—the Indian wave energy program. Current Sci 60:676–680Google Scholar
- 2.Whittaker TJT, McIlwaine SJ, Raghunathan S (1993) A review of the Islay shoreline wave power station. In: Proceedings of first European wave energy symposium, paper G6, pp 283–286Google Scholar
- 3.Torre-Enciso Y, Ortubia I, López de Aguileta LI, Marqués J (2009) Mutriku wave power plant: from the thinking out to the reality. In: Proceedings 8th European wave tidal energy conference, pp 319–329Google Scholar
- 4.Arena F, Romolo A, Malara G, Fiamma V, Laface V (2016) The first worldwide application at full-scale of the REWEC3 device in the port of civitavecchia: initial energetic performances. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on renewable energies offshore (RENEW2016), pp 303–311Google Scholar
- 12.Sundar V, Torgeir M, Jorgen H (2010) Conceptual designs on integration of oscillating water column devices in breakwaters. In: Proceedings of the ASME 29th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, Shanghai, 6–11 June 2010, pp 479–489Google Scholar
- 18.Kamath A (2015) Doctoral thesis CFD based investigation of wave-structure interaction and hydrodynamics of an oscillating water column device. Thesis for the DegreeGoogle Scholar
- 24.Wilcox DC (1994) Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries Inc., La Canada, CAGoogle Scholar
- 26.Jacobsen NG, Fuhrman DR, Fredsøe J (2011) A wave generation toolbox for the open-source CFD library: OpenFoam®. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld
- 27.John Ashlin S, Sundar V, Sannasiraj SA (2016) Effects of bottom profile of an oscillating water column device on its hydrodynamic characteristics. Renew Energy 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.091s