Ethical Issues in Surgical Education Research
This chapter introduces some elements of moral philosophy in order to contextualise the ethical review process and provide a framework for the ethical consideration necessary to successfully negotiate ethical review and be an ethical researcher. Given its complexity and lack of consistency, it is impossible to provide unequivocal pragmatic advice suitable for local ethical review processes. However, this chapter discusses ethical issues inherent in some research approaches and considers the three ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence and justice and the common ethical issues of confidentiality, consent, power and positionality. There are seldom simple answers when considering such issues, and the chapter also includes short vignettes to facilitate the reflective deliberation of ethical issues and how they might be addressed in the conduct of educational research practice.
KeywordsRespect for persons Beneficence Justice Utilitarianism Deontology Virtue ethics Confidentiality Consent Power and positionality
- 1.Stewart, N. (2009). Ethics. Polity.Google Scholar
- 2.Churchill, L. R. (1999). Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of bioethicists. Daedalus, 128, 253–274 259.Google Scholar
- 3.Robinson, R., & Foucault, M. Ethics. In The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. ISSN 2161-0002. http://www.iep.utm.edu/. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
- 4.DHEW (Department of Health Education & Welfare), The Belmont Report. (1979). Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
- 6.Bresler, L. (1996). Towards the creation of a new ethical code in qualitative research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 1, 17–29.Google Scholar
- 9.Resnik, D. (2011). What is ethics in research & why is it important. In The national. Available at: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm?links=false. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
- 10.Goldacre, B. (2013). Building evidence into education. Department for Education.Google Scholar
- 11.Ellis, C. (2011). Communicating qualitative research designs to research ethics review boards. The Qualitative Report, 16(3), 881–891.Google Scholar
- 13.Coupal, L. (2005). Practitioner-research and the regulation of research ethics: The challenge of individual, organizational, and social interests. Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1).Google Scholar