Advertisement

Ethical Issues in Surgical Education Research

  • Martyn KingsburyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Innovation and Change in Professional Education book series (ICPE, volume 17)

Overview

This chapter introduces some elements of moral philosophy in order to contextualise the ethical review process and provide a framework for the ethical consideration necessary to successfully negotiate ethical review and be an ethical researcher. Given its complexity and lack of consistency, it is impossible to provide unequivocal pragmatic advice suitable for local ethical review processes. However, this chapter discusses ethical issues inherent in some research approaches and considers the three ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence and justice and the common ethical issues of confidentiality, consent, power and positionality. There are seldom simple answers when considering such issues, and the chapter also includes short vignettes to facilitate the reflective deliberation of ethical issues and how they might be addressed in the conduct of educational research practice.

Keywords

Respect for persons Beneficence Justice  Utilitarianism Deontology Virtue ethics Confidentiality Consent Power and positionality 

References

  1. 1.
    Stewart, N. (2009). Ethics. Polity.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Churchill, L. R. (1999). Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of bioethicists. Daedalus, 128, 253–274 259.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robinson, R., & Foucault, M. Ethics. In The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. ISSN 2161-0002. http://www.iep.utm.edu/. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
  4. 4.
    DHEW (Department of Health Education & Welfare), The Belmont Report. (1979). Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
  5. 5.
    Bosk, C., & De Vries, R. (2004). Bureaucracies of mass deception: Institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research. Annals AAPSS, 595, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bresler, L. (1996). Towards the creation of a new ethical code in qualitative research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 1, 17–29.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ten Cate, O. (2009). Why the ethics of medical education research differs from that of medical research. Medical Education, 43(7), 608–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jamrozik, K. (2004). Research ethics paperwork: What is the plot we seem to have lost? BMJ, 329, 286–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Resnik, D. (2011). What is ethics in research & why is it important. In The national. Available at: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm?links=false. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
  10. 10.
    Goldacre, B. (2013). Building evidence into education. Department for Education.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellis, C. (2011). Communicating qualitative research designs to research ethics review boards. The Qualitative Report, 16(3), 881–891.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brooks, R., Te Riele, K., & Maguire, M. (2014). Ethics and education research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coupal, L. (2005). Practitioner-research and the regulation of research ethics: The challenge of individual, organizational, and social interests. Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walther, J. (2002). Research ethics in internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Development UnitImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations