Advertisement

Citizenship Status and Identities of Ethnic Minorities: Cases of Hong Kong Filipino Youth

  • Hoi-Yu Ng
  • Kerry J. KennedyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 32)

Abstract

Citizenship status is the legal membership of a political community such as nation-state, while citizenship identity is the subjective meaning a person gives to that community. The citizenship status of ethnic minorities in postcolonial Hong Kong is particularly problematic due to the complex legal institutions laid down by Britain and China. Although many ethnic minorities are Hong Kong permanent residents, their national citizenship is less clear. Many remain citizens of their countries of origin, while some have successfully acquired Chinese or British citizenship. This chapter explores how ethnic minority youth construct their citizenship identities under the Hong Kong context. It also explores the factors that might have influenced their citizenship identities. Based on in-depth interviews with four young Hong Kong Filipinos, we found that their citizenship identity is diverse, with a participant holding dual identities with Hong Kong and the Philippines and two not identifying strongly with any polities. For some participants, citizenship status is not closely linked to their citizenship identities, which are also shaped by factors like discrimination, cultural compatibility, inter-ethnic networks, and instrumental considerations. Lastly, like many local Chinese youth, most participants hold varying degrees of anti-China sentiment. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The research reported here was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council, Hong Kong (Project No.: 18402514).

References

  1. Avebury, E. (2009, March 14). Britain must resolve issue of stateless people. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com
  2. Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, M. B. (1999). Multiple identities and identity transition: Implications for Hong Kong. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(2), 187–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00034-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busetti, S., Dente, B., & Melloni, E. (2013, June). Solving the puzzle of causality: Social mechanisms as the missing link between institutional features and policy outcomes. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Public Policy, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
  6. Census and Statistics Department. (2012). 2011 population census – Thematic report: Ethnic minorities. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.Google Scholar
  7. Chan, J. M. M. (2008). Immigration policies and human resources planning. In A. S. M. Ku & H. F. Siu (Eds.), Hong Kong mobile: Making a global population (pp. 149–200). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, C. K. (2014). China as “other”: Resistance to and ambivalence toward national identity in Hong Kong. China Perspectives, 2014(1), 25–34.Google Scholar
  9. Cheung, S. (2012, August 14). Businessman Philip Khan born in Hong Kong cannot get passport. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com
  10. Cheung, K. (2016, January 18). Hong Kong girl denied Hong Kong passport, forced to give up scholarship. Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved from https://www.hongkongfp.com
  11. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2001). Lives in context: The art of life history research. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dummett, A. (2006). United Kingdom. In R. Bauböck, E. Ersbøll, G. Kees, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and loss of nationality: Policies and trends in 15 European states (pp. 551–585). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Equal Opportunities Commission. (2012). Study on racial encounters and discrimination experienced by South Asians. Hong Kong: Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Fleischmann, F., & Phalet, K. (2016). Identity conflict or compatibility: A comparison of Muslim minorities in five European cities. Political Psychology, 37(4), 447–463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2004). Migrant mobilization between political institutions and citizenship regimes: A comparison of France and Switzerland. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 51–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00145.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2015). Hong Kong poverty situation report on ethnic minorities 2014. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  17. Green, E. (2011). Endogenous ethnicity. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  18. Gu, M. (2015). A complex interplay between religion, gender and marginalization: Pakistani schoolgirls in Hong Kong. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(11), 1934–1951.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.941895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gu, M., & Patkin, J. (2013). Heritage and identity: Ethnic minority students from South Asia in Hong Kong. Linguistics and Education, 24(2), 131–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gube, J. (2015). Classroom, identity and diversity: Ethnic identity negotiation of Filipino students in Hong Kong multiethnic classrooms. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Hero, R. E., & Tolbert, C. J. (2004). Minority voices and citizen attitudes about government responsiveness in the American states: Do social and institutional context matter? British Journal of Political Science, 34(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopkins, N. (2011). Dual identities and their recognition: Minority group members’ perspectives. Political Psychology, 32(2), 251–270.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00804.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Juss, S. S. (1993). Immigration, nationality and citizenship. New York: Mansell.Google Scholar
  24. Karlsen, S., & Nazroo, J. Y. (2002). Agency and structure: The impact of ethnic identity and racism on the health of ethnic minority people. Sociology of Health & Illness, 24(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karlsen, S., & Nazroo, J. Y. (2013). Influences on forms of national identity and feeling ‘at home’ among Muslim groups in Britain, Germany and Spain. Ethnicities, 13(6), 689–708.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812470795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Law, K., & Lee, K. (2013). Socio-political embeddings of south Asian ethnic minorities’ economic situations in Hong Kong. Journal of Contemporary China, 22(84), 984–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.795312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lock, G., & Detaramani, C. (2006). Being Indian in post-colonial Hong Kong: Models of ethnicity, culture and language among Sandhi’s and Sikhs in Hong Kong. Asian Ethnicity, 7(3), 267–284.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14631360600926972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma, E. K. W., & Fung, A. Y. H. (2007). Negotiating local and national identifications: Hong Kong identity surveys 1996–2006. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(2), 172–185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980701306555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maxwell, R. (2006). Muslims, South Asians and the British mainstream: A national identity crisis? West European Politics, 29(4), 736–756.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380600842312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Merrill, B., & West, L. (2009). Using biographical methods in social research. Los Angeles: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nandi, A., & Platt, L. (2015). Patterns of minority and majority identification in a multicultural society. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(15), 2615–2634.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1077986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicol, A. (1993). Nationality and immigration. In R. Blackburn (Ed.), Rights of citizenship (pp. 254–270). London: Mansell.Google Scholar
  34. O’Connor, P. (2010). Accepting prejudice and valuing freedom: Young Muslims and everyday multiculturalism in Hong Kong. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(5), 525–539.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2010.513085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ortmann, S. (2015). The umbrella movement and Hong Kong’s protracted democratization process. Asian Affairs, 46(1), 32–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2014.994957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pierson, C. (2011). The modern state. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to a critical humanism. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plüss, C. (2006). Becoming different while becoming the same: Re-territorializing Islamic identities with multi-ethnic practices in Hong Kong. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(4), 656–675.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870600665334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roland, G. (2004). Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 109–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siroky, D. S., & Mahmudlu, C. (2016). E pluribus unum? Ethnicity, Islam, and the construction of identity in Azerbaijan. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(2), 94–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1082124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. So, A. Y. (2016). The making of Hong Kong nationalism. In J. Kingston (Ed.), Asian nationalism reconsidered (pp. 135–146). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tolbert, C. J., & Hero, R. E. (2001). Dealing with diversity: Racial/ethnic context and social policy change. Political Research Quarterly, 54(3), 571–604.  https://doi.org/10.2307/449271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tsoi, G. (2012, July 26). Identity crisis. HK Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com.
  45. Weldon, S. A. (2006). The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 331–349.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00187.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White, R. M. (1987). Hong Kong: Nationality, immigration and the agreement with China. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 36(3), 483–503.  https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/36.3.483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yew, C. P., & Kwong, K. (2014). Hong Kong identity on the rise. Asian Survey, 54(6), 1088–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2014.54.6.1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  2. 2.University of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations