Advertisement

Linguistic Landscape and Social Equality in an Ethnic Tourism Village in Guizhou, China

  • Feifei ShanEmail author
  • Bob Adamson
  • Chengyu Liu
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 32)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the linguistic landscape in a typical ethnic tourism village in Guizhou Province, China, by focusing on the language choice and arrangement of the linguistic landscape and the attitudes of different groups toward the languages involved. The results are interpreted using the notion of cultural capital to show the relationship among various languages and their social status. The linguistic landscape provides a window for examining the social status and power relations among languages in this multilingual society. The study shows that the power and social status of these languages are different, which indicates that the cultural capital of these language communities is distributed unevenly. The ecology of languages in this multilingual society is also unbalanced. Most notably, the living space of the vernacular Miao ethnic language is squeezed, which considerably hinders not only its maintenance but also the sustainable development of the ethic tourism village. The research demonstrates that the relationship among linguistic landscape, cultural capital, and ecology of languages is multidirectional. It concludes that, by promoting multilingual education, the cultural capital of the ethnic language can be enhanced and the ecological balance of languages can be redressed, thus improving the social status and vitality of the ethnic language.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This publication was supported by a grant from the International Association for Multilingual Education.

References

  1. Adamson, B., & Feng, A. W. (2009). A comparison of trilingual education policies for ethnic minorities in China. Compare, 39(3), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamson, B., & Feng, A. W. (2014). Models for trilingual education in the People’s Republic of China. In D. Gorter, V. Zenotz, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Minority languages and multilingual education (pp. 29–44). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamson, B., & Feng, A. W. (2015). Trilingualism in education: Models and challenges. In A. W. Feng & B. Adamson (Eds.), Trilingualism in education in China: Models and challenges (pp. 243–258). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1983). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Carrington, V., & Luke, A. (1997). Literacy and Bourdieu’s sociological theory: A reframing. Language and Education, 11(2), 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape and minority languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng, A. W., & Adamson, B. (Eds.). (2015). Trilingualism in education in China: Models and challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Gorter, D. (2006). Introduction: The study of the linguistic landscape as a new approach to multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, E., Ma, F., & Adamson, B. (2016). Developing trilingual education in Western China. In C. K. J. Lee, Z. Y. Yu, X. H. Huang, & H. F. E. Law (Eds.), Educational development in Western China: Towards quality and equity (pp. 177–190). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tollefson, J. W., & Tsui, A. B. (Eds.). (2003). Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, Z. A., Wen, L. T., & Li, G. H. (2015). Trilingual education in China’s Korean communities. In A. W. Feng & B. Adamson (Eds.), Trilingualism in education in China: Models and challenges (pp. 47–64). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Foreign LanguagesKaili UniversityKailiChina
  2. 2.Department of International Education and Lifelong LearningThe Education University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  3. 3.College of International StudiesSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations