Advertisement

From Living in Cultural and Linguistic Diversity to Equitable Outcomes in Education: An Introduction

  • Jan GUBEEmail author
  • Fang GAO
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 32)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the contributions in this book, which brings together a group of scholars interested to shed light on the educational experiences of different ethnic minority groups in multilingual contexts in Asia. It draws together studies and perspectives that link ethnolinguistic practices, racialized experiences, and institutional policies and processes on how ethnic minorities in the region are situated in their historical and contemporary moments. Through the insights arising from these contributions, it is argued that debates on how equitable outcomes in education might be achieved can be moved forward by paying attention to and making the case for recognizing and valuing cultural and linguistic diversity in Asian societies.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the insights and reading of Prof. Kerry Kennedy and the careful editing and comments of Dr. Katherine Foriester on this chapter.

References

  1. Antonsich, M. (2016). Interculturalism versus multiculturalism: The Cantle-Modood debate. Ethnicities, 16(3), 470–493.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796815604558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cantle, T. (2016). Interculturalism: ‘Learning to live in diversity’. Ethnicities, 16(3), 470–493.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796815604558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Connelly, J., & Gube, J. (2013). Equity and ethnicity in Hong Kong: Implications for teacher education. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 17(1), 113–125.Google Scholar
  4. Connelly, J., Gube, J., & Thapa, C. (2013). Hong Kong’s ethnic and linguistic minority immigrant students: An evaluation of educational support measures. In E. L. Brown & A. Krasteva (Eds.), Migrants and refugees: Equitable education for displaced populations (pp. 191–214). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Feng, A. W., & Adamson, B. (2017). Language policies and sociolinguistic domains in the context of minority groups in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao, F. (2011). Linguistic capital continuity and change in educational language policies for South Asians in Hong Kong primary schools. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao, F. (2012). Imagined community, identity, and Chinese language teaching in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 22(1), 140–154.Google Scholar
  9. Gao, F. (2016). Paradox of multiculturalism: Invisibility of Koreanness in Chinese curriculum. Asian Ethnicity, 17(3), 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao, F. (2017). Capital multiplicity and convertibility: Language minorities’ multidimensional challenges to accessing postsecondary education in Hong Kong. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(8), 1165–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao, F., & Lai, C. (2017). Biculturalism and segregated schooling in Hong Kong. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, online first, 1–12.Google Scholar
  12. Gube, J. (2015). Can I still be myself around them here? Re-envisioning ethnic identity negotiation in multiethnic schools through a dialogic approach. Knowledge Cultures, 3(4), 131–152.Google Scholar
  13. Gube, J. (2017). Sociocultural trail within the dialogical self: I-positions, institutions and cultural armory. Culture & Psychology, 23(1), 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16650812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gundara, J. (2017). Intercultural and international understandings: Non-centric knowledge and curriculum in asia. In Y.-K. Cha, J. Gundara, S.-H. Ham, & M. Lee (Eds.), Multicultural education in global perspectives: Policy and institutionalization (pp. 61–72). Singapore: Springer Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He, B. (2003). Minority rights: A Confucian critique of Kymlicka’s theory of nonassimilation. In K.-c. Chong, S.-h. Tan, & C. L. Ten (Eds.), The moral circle and the self: Chinese and Western approaches (pp. 219–245). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  16. He, B., & Kymlicka, W. (2005). Introduction. In W. Kymlicka & B. He (Eds.), Multiculturalism in Asia (pp. 1–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, K. J. (2011). The “long march” toward multiculturalism in Hong Kong: Supporting ethnic minority students in a Confucian state. In J. Phillion, M. T. Hue, & Y. Wang (Eds.), Minority students in East Asia (pp. 155–173). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (1997). Introduction: What is multiculturalism. In J. L. Kincheloe & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Changing multiculturalism (Vol. 1–26). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kymlicka, W. (2015). The essentialist critique of multiculturalism: Theories, policies, ethos. In V. Uberoi & T. Modood (Eds.), Multiculturalism rethought: Interpretations, dilemmas and new directions (pp. 209–249). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, W. O. (2004). Concepts and issues of Asian citizenship: Spiritually, harmony and individuality. In W. O. Lee, D. L. Grossman, K. J. Kennedy, & G. P. Fairbrother (Eds.), Citizenship education in Asia and the Pacific: Concepts and issues (pp. 277–288). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, M. A. (2011). Introduction—Ethnic minorities in Asia: Inclusion or exclusion? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(5), 751–761.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.537361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Modood, T. (2017). Must interculturalists misinterpret multiculturalism. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(15), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-017-0058-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Okamoto, D., & Mora, G. C. (2014). Panethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 219–239.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillion, J., Hue, M. T., & Wang, Y. (Eds.). (2011). Minority students in East Asia: Government policies, school practices and teacher responses. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Postglione, G. A. (2017). Education, ethnicity, society and global change in Asia: The selected works of Gerard A. Postglione. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Romaine, S. (2011). Identity and multilingualism. In K. Potowski & J. Rothman (Eds.), Bilingual youth: Spanish in English-speaking societies (pp. 7–30). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UNESCO. (2009). Investing in cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001852/185202e.pdf
  29. UNESCO Bangkok. (2005). First language first: Community-based literacy programmes for minority language contexts in Asia. UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education. Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001402/140280e.pdf
  30. United Nations. (2013). Concluding observations on third periodic report of Hong Kong, China, adopted by the Committee at its 107th session. Retrieved from http://www.cmab.gov.hk/doc/en/documents/policy_responsibilities/the_rights_of_the_individuals/Advance_Version_2013_ICCPR_e.pdf
  31. Vertovec, S., & Wessendorf, S. (Eds.). (2010). The multiculturalism backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations