Environmental Challenges and Opportunities in Marine Engine Heavy Fuel Oil Combustion

  • Abdul Gani Abdul JameelEmail author
  • Abdulrahman Alkhateeb
  • Selvedin Telalović
  • Ayman M. Elbaz
  • William L. Roberts
  • S. Mani Sarathy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 22)


Heavy fuel oil (HFO) has been used as fuel to propel marine engines for over half a century. HFO combustion results in the release of particulate matter like smoke, cenospheres, and ash, and the high sulfur content in HFO results in sulfur dioxide emissions. The use of HFO has resulted in deleterious effects on the environment and on human health. As a result, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has placed a complete ban on its use on ships in the Antarctic waters to preserve the ecosystem from harm; by 2020, this regulation could be extended to the rest of the world. In the present work, the environmental challenges associated with HFO combustion in the form of gaseous emissions like CO2, CO, SO2, and NO were analyzed using TGA-FTIR technique. Particulate emission like cenosphere formation during HFO combustion was also studied by employing HFO droplet combustion experiments. The influence of asphaltenes, which are notorious for negatively impacting HFO combustion and are responsible for cenosphere formation, was also studied. Strategies like desulfurization, asphaltene removal, and gasification were proposed to help reduce the environmental impact of ships powered by HFO.


Heavy fuel oil Sulfur dioxide Cenospheres Asphaltenes 



Research reported in this publication was supported by Saudi Electric Company (SEC) and by competitive research funding from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). The authors acknowledge support from the Clean Combustion Research Center under the Future Fuels research program.


  1. 1.
    U.S. EIA (2016) The International Energy Outlook 2016, pp 1–279Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elbaz AM, Gani A, Hourani N, Emwas A-H, Sarathy SM, Roberts WL (2015) TG/DTG, FT-ICR mass spectrometry, and NMR spectroscopy study of heavy fuel oil. Energy Fuels 29:7825–7835. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdul Jameel AG, Elbaz AM, Emwas A-H, Roberts WL, Sarathy SM (2016) Calculation of average molecular parameters, functional groups, and a surrogate molecule for heavy fuel oils using 1 H and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Energy Fuels 30:3894–3905. Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Energy Council: Global Transport Scenarios 2050, pp 1–72Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karatepe N, Küçükbayrak S (1993) Proximate analysis of some Turkish lignites by thermogravimetry. Thermochim Acta 213:147–150. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abdul Jameel AG, Han Y, Brignoli O, Telalović S, Elbaz AM, Im HG, Roberts WL, Sarathy SM (2017) Heavy fuel oil pyrolysis and combustion: kinetics and evolved gases investigated by TGA-FTIR. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 127:183–195. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abdul Jameel AG, Naser N, Emwas A-H, Dooley S, Sarathy SM (2016) Predicting fuel ignition quality using 1 H NMR spectroscopy and multiple linear regression. Energy Fuels 30:9819–9835. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Treatment of tannery effluent using a rotating disc electrochemical reactor. Water Environ Res 1–2. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bomo N, Lahaye J, Prado G, Claus G (1985) Formation of cenospheres during pyrolysis of residual fuel oils. Symp Combust 20:903–911. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartle KD, Jones JM, Lea-Langton AR, Pourkashanian M, Ross AB, Thillaimuthu JS, Waller PR, Williams A (2013) The combustion of droplets of high-asphaltene heavy oils. Fuel 103:835–842. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levy A, Merryman EL, Reid WT (1970) Mechanisms of formation of sulfur oxides in combustion. Environ Sci Technol 4:653–662. Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Filippis P, Scarsella M (2003) Oxidative desulfurization: oxidation reactivity of sulfur compounds in different organic matrixes. Energy Fuels 17:1452–1455. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farshi A, Shiralizadeh P (2015) Sulfur reduction of heavy fuel oil by oxidative desulfurization (ODS) method. Pet Coal 57:295–302Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hasan SW, Ghannam MT, Esmail N (2010) Heavy crude oil viscosity reduction and rheology for pipeline transportation. Fuel 89:1095–1100. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vaezi M, Passandideh-Fard M, Moghiman M, Charmchi M (2011) Gasification of heavy fuel oils: a thermochemical equilibrium approach. Fuel 90:878–885. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meratizaman M, Monadizadeh S, Pourali O, Amidpour M (2015) High efficient-low emission power production from low BTU gas extracted from heavy fuel oil gasification, introduction of IGCC-SOFC process. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 23:1–15. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bates RP, Dölle K (2017) Syngas use in internal combustion engines—a review. Int J Innov Res Multidiscip Field 10:1–8. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghassemi H, Beheshti SM, Shahsavan-Markadeh R (2015) Mathematical modeling of extra-heavy oil gasification at different fuel water contents. Fuel 162:258–263. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clean Combustion Research Centre (CCRC)King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)ThuwalSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Catalysis CentreKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)ThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations