Advertisement

Numerical Modelling on Enhanced Mobility of Petroleum Hydrocarbon in Saturated Porous Media

  • M. BerlinEmail author
  • G. Suresh Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 22)

Abstract

Petroleum contamination in groundwater is a widespread and well-known global environmental problem, mainly due to the leaking of aged pipelines or storage tank. The in situ treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons is relatively difficult to perform especially during pump-and-treat technique due to the trapped low-soluble hydrocarbons in the soil pores. The solubility enhancement and improved bioavailability of the small solvable portions in the petroleum products such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) can be performed by surfactants. This study aims to understand the enhanced mobility on PAH (phenanthrene) with the availability of surfactants and the associated physicochemical interactions in the saturated porous media. A 1D model is established in this regard to study the impact of surfactant on PAH enhanced solubility and subsequent transport in the saturated porous system. The hydraulic properties of soil, equilibrium partitioning and all reactions on the fate and movement of PAH are carefully included in this work. The results show that a considerable increase in the aqueous phase PAH concentration during the availability of surfactant (Triton N-101). In addition, the influence of partitioning between aqueous and solid phase, biodegradation, oxygen mass transfer are showing substantial variation on PAH transport in the saturated zone. The developed numerical model can be efficiently useful for the prediction of low-soluble organic fraction during the in situ remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination.

Keywords

Numerical model Saturated porous media Surfactant Transport Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon 

References

  1. 1.
    Che MD (2002) Conservative cost estimate including investigation and monitoring expenses. In: Soil and groundwater remediation conference, TaipeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rayner JL, Snape I, Walworth JL, Harvey PM, Ferguson SH (2007) Petroleum–hydrocarbon contamination and remediation by microbioventing at sub-Antarctic Macquarie Island. Cold Regions Sci Technol 48:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sulaymon AH, Gzar HA (2011) Experimental investigation and numerical modeling of light nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution and transport in a saturated zone of the soil. J Hazard Mater 186:1601–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agarwal T (2009) Concentration level, pattern and toxic potential of PAHs in traffic soil of Delhi, India. J Hazard Mater 171:894–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilcke W (2000) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil-a review. J Plant Nutrit Soil Sci 163:229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tian W, Wang L, Li D, Li F (2014) Leachability of phenanthrene from soil under acid rain and its relationship with dissolved organic matter. Environ Earth SciGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA (1993) Sources of the fine organic aerosol 2. Road dust, tire debris, organometallic brake lining dust: roads as sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 27:636–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okuda T, Kumata H, Naraoka H (2002) Origin of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Chinese cities solved by compound-specific stable carbon isotopic analyses. Organ Geochem 33:1737–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh DP, Gadi R, Mandal TK (2012) Levels, sources, and toxic potential of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soil of Delhi, India. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18:393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaw GR, Connell DW (1994) Prediction and monitoring of the carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs). Rev Environ Contaminat Toxicol 135:1–62Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones KC, Stratford JA, Waterhouse KS, Vogt NB (1989) Organic contaminants in Welsh soils: polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol 23:540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    FAO (2008) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. http://www.codexalimentarius.net/mrls/pestdes/jsp/pest_q-e.jsp
  14. 14.
    Gustafson DI (1989) Groundwater ubiquity score: a simple method for assessing pesticide leachability. Environ Toxicol Chem 8:339–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ogbuagu DH, Okoli CG, Gilbert CL, Madu S (2011) Determination of the contamination of groundwater sources in Okrika mainland with polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Br J Environ Climate Change 1(3):90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hockenreiner M, Neugebauer H, Elango L (2013) Ex situ bioremediation method for the treatment of groundwater contaminated with PAHs. Int J Environ Sci TechnolGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brindha K, Elango L (2014) PAHs contamination in groundwater from a part of metropolitan city, India: a study based on sampling over a 10-year period. Environ Earth Sci 71:5113–5120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Estrada JM, Allieri MAA, Alvarez PJJ, Vazquez RR (2006) Phenanthrene removal by Penicillium frequentans grown on solid state culture: effect of oxygen concentration. Environ Technol 27:1073–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen JL, Wong MH, Wong YS, Tam NFY (2011) Modeling sorption and biodegradation of phenanthrene in mangrove sediment slurry. J Hazard Mater 190:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amellal S, Boivin A, Ganier CP, Schiavon M (2006) High sorption of phenanthrene in agricultural soils. Agron Sustain Dev 26:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magee BR, Lion LW, Lemley AT (1991) Transport of dissolved organic macromolecules and their effect on the transport of phenanthrene in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 25:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jenkins MB, Lion LW (1993) Mobile bacteria and transport of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in porous media. Appl Environ, Microbio 59(10):3306–3313Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soleimani M, Afyuni M, Charkhabi AH (2013) Transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a calcareous wetland soil. Caspian J Env Sci 11(2):131–140Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chong ZY, Liao XY, Yan XL, Sun L, Zhao D, Liang T (2014) Enhanced desorption of PAHs from manufactured gas plant soils using different types of surfactants. Pedosphere 24(2):209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu H, Huang GH, Xiao H, Wang L, Chen W (2014) Combined effects of DOM and biosurfactant enhanced biodegradation of polycylic armotic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil–water systems. Environ Sci PollutGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shin KH, Kim KW, Seagren EA (2004) Combined effects of pH and biosurfactant addition on solubilization and biodegradation of phenanthrene. Appl Microbio Biotechnol 65(3):336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fang J, Shan X, Wen B, Huang R (2013) Mobility of TX100 suspended multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and the facilitated transport of phenanthrene in real soil columns. Geoderma 207–208:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Choi JW, Kim SB, Ha HC, Kim DJ (2005) Analysis of benzene transport in a two dimensional aquifer model. Hydrol Process 19:2481–2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berlin M, Suresh Kumar G, Nambi IM (2015) Numerical modelling on fate and transport of petroleum hydrocarbons in an unsaturated sub-surface system for varying source scenario. J Earth Syst Sci 124(3):665–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berlin M, Suresh Kumar G, Nambi IM (2014) Numerical modeling on transport of nitrogen from wastewater and fertilizer applied on paddy fields. Ecol Model 278:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Natarajan N, Suresh Kumar G (2011) Numerical modelling of bacteria facilitated contaminant transport in fractured porous media. Colloids and surfaces A: physico. Eng Aspects 387:104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berlin M, Suresh Kumar G, Nambi IM (2014) Numerical modeling of biological clogging on transport of nitrate in an unsaturated porous media. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3285–3298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berlin M, Suresh Kumar G, Nambi IM (2014) Numerical modeling on the effect of dissolved oxygen on nitrogen transformation and transport in an unsaturated porous system. Environ Model Assess 19(4):283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guha S, Jaffe PR (1996) Biodegradation kinetics of phenanthrene partitioned into the micellar phase of nonionic surfactants. Environ Sci Technol 30:605–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Clement TP, Hooker BS, Skeen RS (1996) Macroscopic models for predicting changes in saturated porous media properties caused by microbial growth. Ground Water 34(5):934–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meerschaerta MM, Tadjeran C (2006) Finite difference approximations foe two-sided space-fractional partial differential equations. Appl Numer Math 56:80–90MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Van Dam JC, Feddes RA (2000) Numerical simulation of infiltration, evaporation and shallow groundwater levels with the Richards equation. J Hydrol 233:72–85Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bauer P, Attinger S, Kinzelbach W (2001) Transport of a decay chain in homogeneous porous media: analytical solution. J Contam Hydrol 49:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mitchell RJ, Mayer AS (1998) A numerical model for transienthysteretic flow and solution transport in unsaturated porous media. J Contam Hydrol 50:243–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee MS, Lee KK, Hyun Y, Clement TP, Hamilton D (2006) Nitrogen transformation and transport modeling in groundwater aquifers. Ecol Model 192:143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rehman MM, Liedl R, Grathwohl P (2004) Sorption kinetics during macropore transport of organic contaminants in soils: laboratory experiments and analytical modeling. Water Resour Res 40:W01503Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hendry MJ, Lawrence JR, Maloszewski P (1999) Effects of velocity on the transport of two bacteria through saturated sand. Ground Water 37:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guha S, Peters CA, Jeffe PR (1999) Multisubstrate biodegradation kinetics of naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene mixtures. Biotechnol Bioengg 65(5):491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen YM, Abriola LM, Alvarez PJJ, Anid PJ, Vogel TM (1992) Modeling transport and biodegradation of benzene and toluene in sandy aquifer material: comparisons with experimental measurements. Water Resour Res 28:1833–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Moscoso F, Deive FJ, Longo MA, Sanroman MA (2012) Technoeconomic assessment of phenanthrene degradation by Pseudomonas stutzeri CECT 930 in a batch bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 104:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kinzelbach W, Schafer W, Herzer J (1991) Numerical modeling of natural and enhanced denitrification processes in aquifers. Water Resour Res 27:1123–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Arunachal PradeshYupiaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Ocean EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations