Advertisement

Estimating Belowground Free Phase Gas (FPG) in Tropical Peatlands of South-West Coast of India Using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

  • Koravangatt DeviEmail author
  • Rajesh R. Nair
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 22)

Abstract

The south-west depression of Kerala-Konkan onshore peatland is one of the most promising areas for shallow biogenic methane existence in India. The shallow biogenic methane gas in the area is intimately linked to the sedimentary environments and palaeo-drainage system emerged due to the evolution of the West coastal system as the result of sea level fluctuations. Depressions caused by such fluvial incisions were drowned and filled up by sediments during a subsequent transgression in the study sites. The main purpose of this study is to identify the spatial distribution of hotspots by surface-based non-invasive GPR surveys as the tool for estimating free phase gas fractional volume from multi-offset profiles by using Complex Refractive Index Model (CRIM). The peat layers of Holocene–Pleistocene age in the sub-coastal areas of Southern Kerala Sedimentary Basin (SKSB) were mapped with ground-penetrating radar (GPR) with frequencies of 100 MHz. The formation of biogenic gas from the peat is either by acetate fermentation pathway or CO2 reduction pathway and is accumulated as the by-product of anaerobic decomposition of organic materials. The escape biogenic methane encountered at the depth of 3–4 m and 16–18 m on the coastal inland area few kilometre far from the present coastline. Cross-sectional plots display the spatial variation of gas dynamics identified based on the shadow zone due to the variations in electromagnetic wave velocity and amplitude of radar signals have significant correlation with direct measurement of free phase gas (FPG) volume. A conceptual model developed from the present study based on the escape or loss of methane from peatlands via two mechanisms—one, by shallow diffusion and episodic ebullition (from 3 to 5 m depth) of methane from the peat pores matrix and second is, the deep ebullition (from >16 m depth) processes due to the breakage of confining woody peat layer, which causes a large rates of abrupt escape of methane from peatlands to the atmosphere evidenced by the GPR measurements.

Keywords

Biogenic methane Ebullition Ground-penetrating radar Peatlands Kerala 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the laboratory fellows who helped to collect GPR data from the field and grateful for the financial support provided by Gas Authority of India Limited and IIT Madras to carry out this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Nair KK (2007) Quaternary geology and geomorphology of the coastal plains of Kerala. Geological Survey of India, Special publications 73Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nayar S, Nayar NM (1997) Wetlands. In: Thampi KB, Nayar NM, Nayar CS (eds) The natural resources of Kerala. WWF State Office, Trivandrum, pp 369–374Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajagopalan G, Sukumar R, Ramesh R, Pant RK, Rajagopalan G (1997) Late quaternary vegetational and climate changes from tropical peats in southern India extended record up to 40,000 years BP. Curr Sci 73:60–63Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phadtare NR, Pant RK (2006) A century-scale pollen record of vegetation and climate history during the past 3500 years in the Pinder Valley, Kumaon Higher Himalaya, India. J Geol Soc India 68:495–506Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rice DD, Claypool GE (1981) Generation, accumulation, resource potential of biogenic gas. AAPG Bull 65:5–25Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whiticar MJ, Faber E, Scheoll M (1986) Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction versus acetate fermentation-isotope evidence. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50:693–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whiticar M (1989) A geochemical perspective of natural gas and atmospheric methane. Org Geochem 16:531–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mascarenhas J (1993) Molecular mechanisms of pollen tube growth and differentiation. Plant Cell 5:1303–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rajendran CP, Rajagopalan G, Narayanaswamy (1989) Quaternary geology of Kerala: evidence from radiocarbon dates. J Geol Soc India 33:218–222Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nair KM, Padmalal D, Kumaran KPN, Sreeja R, Limaye RB, Reji S (2010) Late quaternary evolution of Ashtamudi-Sasthamkotta lake systems of Kerala, south west India. J Asian Earth Sci 37:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumaran KPN, Nair KM, Shindikar M, Limaye RB, Padmalal D (2005) Stratigraphical and palynological appraisal of the late quaternary mangrove deposits of the west coast of India. Q Res 64:418–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Padmalal D, Kumaran KPN, Nair KM, Baijulal B, Limaye RB, Vishnu Mohan S (2011) Evolution of the coastal wetland systems of SW India during the Holocene: evidence from marine and terrestrial archives of Kollam coast, Kerala. Q Inter 237:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Limaye RB, Kumaran KPN, Padmalal D (2014) Mangrove habitat dynamics in response to Holocene sea level and climate changes along southwest coast of India. Q Int 325:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jayalakshmi K, Nair KM, Kumai H, Santosh M (2004) Late pleistocene—holocene palaeoclimatic history of the southern Kerala Basin, Southwest India. Gondwana Res 7:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daniels JJ, Roberts R, Vendl M (1995) Ground penetrating radar for the detection of liquid contaminants. J Appl Geophys 33:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lopes de Castro D, Branco RMGC (2003) 4-D ground penetrating radar monitoring of a hydrocarbon leakage site in Fortaleza (Brazil) during its remediation process: a case history. J Appl Geophys 54:127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neal A (2004) Ground penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress. Earth Sci Rev 66:261–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis JL, Annan AP (1989) Ground penetrating radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophys Prospect 37:531–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huisman JA, Hubbard SS, Redman JD, Annan AP (2003) Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: a review. Vadose Zone 2:476–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parsekian AD, Slater L, Comas X, Glaser PH (2010) Variations in free phase gases in peat landforms determined by ground-penetrating radar. J Geophys Res 115:G02002.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kellner E, Lundin LC (2001) Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content in peat soil. Nord Hydrol 32:315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keller JK, White JR, Bridgham S, Pastor P (2004) Climate change effects on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in peatlands through changes in soil. Glob Change Biol 10:1053–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumaran KPN, Nair KM, Shindikar M, Limaye RB, Padmalal D (2005) Stratigraphical and palynological appraisal of the late quaternary mangrove deposits of the west coast of India. Q Res 64:418–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Comas X, Slater L, Reeve A (2008) Seasonal geophysical monitoring of biogenic gases in a northern peatland: implications for temporal and spatial variability in free phase gas production rates. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 113:G01012.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Comas X, Terry N, Slater L, Warren M, Kolka R, Kristijono A, Sudiana N, Nurjaman D, Darusman T (2015) Imaging tropical peatlands in Indonesia using ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity imaging (ERI): implications for carbon stock estimates and peat soil characterization. Biogeosciences 12:2995–3007.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2995-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Romanowicz EA, Siegel DI, Chanton JP, Glaser PH (1995) Temporal variations in dissolved methane deep in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands, Minnesota. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glaser P, Chanton H, Morin P, Rosenberry DO, Siegel DI, Ruud O, Chasar LI, Reeve AS (2004) Surface deformations as indicators of deep ebullition fluxes in a large northern peatland. Global Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB1003.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coulthard T, Baird AJ, Ramirez J, Waddington JM (2009) Modelling methane dynamics in peat: future prospects, in Northern Peatlands and Carbon Cycling. In: Baird AJ et al (ed) AGU, Washington, D. C. vol 184, p 299Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ocean EngineeringIIT MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations