Advertisement

Methods

  • Craig Lambert
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the design of an empirical study of the effects of referent similarity on the speech of L1 and L2 speakers of English. The chapter outlines the purpose of the study, the experimental design employed, background information concerning the participants, the tasks used to collect the data, and the data collection and analysis procedures employed. The aim throughout is to provide a sound basis for the replication of the study, in whole or in part, in future research. The following chapter will discuss the findings for referent similarity on English use.

References

  1. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistics database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81, 882–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Educational Testing Service. (2008). TOEIC test data and analysis 2007: Number of examinees and scores in FY2007. Tokyo: The Institute for International Business Corporation, TOEIC Steering Committee.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ford, W., & Olson, D. (1975). The elaboration of the noun phrase in children’s descriptions of objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kennedy, C. (2006). Modes of comparison. Proceeding of CLS, 43.Google Scholar
  7. Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 167–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69–90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meara, P. (2005a). Llama_D: A test of phonetic memory. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/
  11. Meara, P. (2005b). Llama_F: A test of grammatical inferencing. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/
  12. Meara, P. (2005c). LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/
  13. Ravid, D., & Berman, R. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language, 30, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robinson, P. (2011a). Task-based language learning: A review of the issues. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robinson, P. (2011b). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sapir, E. (1944). Grading, a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science, 11, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmid, M., Verspoor, M., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Coding and extracting data. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory & foreign language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45a, 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Service, E., & Kahonen, V. (1995). Is the relationship between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied PsychoLinguistics, 16, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shuttleworth, M. (2009). Counterbalanced measures design. Retrieved November, 2011, from Experiment Resources: http://www.experiment-resources.com/cpimterbalanced-measures-design.html
  21. Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 25, 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig Lambert
    • 1
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations