Advertisement

Crossing Over Settings, Practices and Experiences: Connecting Learning in Museums and Classrooms

  • Koula CharitonosEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

This chapter considers the potential of social and mobile technologies to support connecting formal aspects of learning with informal learning experiences that occur during museum visits with an aim to address one specific challenge, namely the need to understand and promote learning across school and out-of-school contexts. It draws on the concepts of ‘mobile pedagogy’ (Kukulska-Hulme et al., in Mobile pedagogy for English language teaching: A guide for teachers. British Council, London, 2015) and ‘crossover learning’ (Sharples et al., in Innovating Pedagogy 2015. Innovation Report 4, The Open University, 2015) to frame an empirical investigation that draws on the use of a microblogging technology (Twitter) by a Year 9 History class (13–14 s) from a secondary school in Milton Keynes during a trip to the Museum of London (http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/). Through specific examples it provides, the chapter emphasises the processes that may enable learning to occur across contexts and calls for pedagogical innovation where the design of seamless learning environments for crossover learning experiences should not be device- or tool-specific, rather be based on firm pedagogical understandings and blend of traditional and mobile pedagogies.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Emeritus Professor Mike Sharples for providing his insights on the concept of crossover learning.

References

  1. Anderson, D., Lucas, B. K., Ginns, S. I., & Dierking, L. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84(5), 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2007). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91(1), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brody, M., Bangert, A., & Dilon, J. (2009). Assessing Learning in Informal Science Contexts. Commissioned paper: Learning Science in Informal Environments: A Review of the Research Past, Present and Future. Board on Science Education. [online] http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/bose/dbasse_080133.
  5. Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., … Hoppe, U. (2006). One-to-One technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charitonos, K., Blake, C., Scanlon, E., & Jones, A. (2012). Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (How) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 802–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C.-C., & Huang, T.-C. (2012). Learning in a u-Museum: Developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 873–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, W., Seow, P., Hyo-Jeong, S., Toh, Y., & Looi, C.-K. (2010). Connecting learning spaces using mobile technology. Educational Technology, 50(5), 45–50.Google Scholar
  9. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mind tools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54(1), 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coughlan, T., Adams, A., Rogers, Y., & Davies, S. (2011). Enabling live dialogic and collaborative learning between field and indoor contexts. In Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Newcastle (pp. 88–98), 4–8 July 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Crook, C., (2012). The “digital native” in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Liddo, A., Buckinghamshire, S., Quinto, I., Bachler, M., & Cannavacciuolo, L. (2011). Discourse-centric learning analytics. Paper presented at the LAK2011, 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Banff, 27 February–1 March 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education—A chance to facilitate informal and process—Oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elavksy, C. M., Mislan, C., & Elavsky, S. (2011). When talking less is more: Exploring outcomes of Twitter usage in the large-lecture hall. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(3), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falk, H. J., Scott, C., Dierking, D. L., Rennie, L. J., & Cohen Jones, M. (2004). Interactives and visitor learning. Curator, 47(2), 171–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hillman, T., Weilenmann, A., Jungselius, B., & Leino Lindell, T. (2014). Traces of engagement: Narrative-making practices with smartphones on a museum field trip. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(2), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2015). Mobile seamless learning and its pedagogy. In L. H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 261–280). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Hsi, S. (2003). A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 19(3), 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu, H. H., & Liao, H. T. (2011). A mobile RFID-based tour system with instant microblogging. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 77(4), 720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hwang, G.-J., & Wu, P.-H. (2014). Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008–2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, A., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kassens-Noor, E. (2012). Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kisiel, J. (2006). An examination of fieldtrip strategies and their implementation within a natural history museum. Science Education,90(3), 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L., & Donohue, J. (2015). Mobile pedagogy for English language teaching: A guide for teachers. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  27. Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2012). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., & Pöllänen, S. (2012). Making learning whole: An instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 51–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Littleton, K. (2010). Research into teaching with whole-class interactive technologies: Emergent themes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Littleton, K., & Kerawalla, L. (2012). Trajectories of inquiry learning. In K. Littleton, E. Scanlon, & M. Sharples (Eds.), Orchestrating inquiry learning (pp. 31–47). Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Livingstone, D. (2006). Informal learning: Conceptual distinctions and preliminary findings. In Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 202–226). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Looi, C.-K., Wong, L-H., Hyo-Jeong So, H-J., Seow, P., Toh, Y, Chen, W., … Soloway, E. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mercer, N., Littleton, K., & Wegerif, R. (2009). Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational activities. In K. Kumpulainen, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 27–42). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  35. Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004) Context-aware support for computer supported ubiquitous learning. In J. Roschelle, T. W. Chan, K. Kinshuk, & S. Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE (WMTE 2004) (pp. 27–34). New York: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  36. Petrelli, D., Ciolfi, L., van Dijk, D., Hornecker, E., Not, E., & Schmidt, A. (2013). Integrating material and digital: A new way for cultural heritage. ACM Interactions Magazine, 20(4), 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pierroux, P., Krange, I., & Sem, I. (2011). Bridging contexts and interpretations: Mobile blogging on art museum field trips. MedieKultur Journal of Media and Communication Research, 50, 30–47.Google Scholar
  38. Ravenscroft, A., Sagar, M., Baur, E., & Oriogun, P. (2008). Ambient pedagogies, meaningful learning and social software. In S. Hatzipanagos & S. Warburton (Eds.), Social software & developing community ontologies (pp. 432–450). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT—The hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sense making. Pervasive Ubiquitous Computing, 14(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., & Mulholland, P. (2011). How technology resources can be used to represent personal inquiry and support students’ understanding of it across contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27(6), 516–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharples, M. (2013). Shared orchestration within and beyond the classroom. Computers & Education, 69, 504–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharples, M. (2015) Seamless learning despite context. In L. -H. Wong, M. Specht, & M. Milrad (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 41–55). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Sharples, M., Scanlon, E., Ainsworth, S., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T., Crook, C., … O’Malley, C. (2014). Personal inquiry: Orchestrating science investigations within and beyond the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 308–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharples, M., Adams, A., Alozie, N., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Gaved, M., … Yarnall, L. (2015). Innovating Pedagogy 2015. Innovation Report 4, The Open University.Google Scholar
  46. Silverman, L. H. (1999). Meaning making matters: Communication, consequences, and exhibit design. Exhibitionist, 18(2), 1–6.Google Scholar
  47. Stahl, G. (2002). Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL. In Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 62–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Suárez, Á., Specht, M., Prinsen, F., Kalz, M., & Ternier, S. (2018). A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 118, 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Toh, Y., So, H.-J., Seow, P., Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2013). Seamless learning in the mobile age: A theoretical and methodological discussion on using cooperative inquiry to study digital kids on-the-move. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53(2), 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Walker, K. (2008). Structuring visitor participation. In L. Tallon & K. Walker (Eds.), Digital technologies and the museum experience. Handheld guides and other media (pp. 109–165). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wong, L.-H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19–E23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wong, L. H., Milrad, M., & Specht, M. (Eds.). (2015). Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Educational TechnologyThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations