Advertisement

The Conceptual Niche of Seamless Learning: An Invitation to Dialogue

  • Lung-Hsiang Wong
  • Chee-Kit LooiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

In this chapter, we seek conceptual clarity on the notion of seamless learning towards understanding its unique contributions towards learning. We will compare the salient characteristics of seamless learning with the definitions and framing of other relevant learning notions or approaches. We postulate that putting together related notions, theorisations or practices of different-named notions of learning together in juxtaposition, can create new sparkles that help us derive new perspectives and insights into learning theory and design. Our initial expositions in this chapter are intended to inform cross-fertilisation between seamless learning and other learning notions to inspire and guide the advancement of further relevant research and practice.

References

  1. Aguayo, C., & Eames, C. (2017). Using mobile learning in free-choice educational settings to enhance ecological literacy. Teachers and Curriculum, 17(2), 7–14.Google Scholar
  2. American College Personnel Association. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Wright, M. (2012). Creating personal meaning through technology-supported science inquiry learning across formal and informal settings. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 251–273.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, T. A. F., Hwang, W.-Y., & Hsieh, C.-H. (2008). A study of a mobile collaborative learning system for Chinese language learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  5. Appleby, Y., & Hamilton, M. (2005). Literacy as social practice: Travelling between the everyday and other forms of learning. In P. Sutherland & J. Crowther (Eds.), Lifelong Learning: Concepts and Contexts (pp. 196–206). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Areglado, R. J. (1996). Learning for life: Creating classrooms for self-directed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. Bachmair, B., & Pachler, N. (2015). Framing ubiquitous mobility educationally: Mobile devices and context-aware learning. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Baloian, N., & Zurita, G. (2012). Ubiquitous mobile knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Sensors, 12, 6995–7014.Google Scholar
  10. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2006). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91(1), 75–95.Google Scholar
  11. Bedore, J. M. (1992). Self-empowerment techniques: A new direction for teachers of college public speaking courses. Paper presented at the Sooner Communication Conference, Norman, OK.Google Scholar
  12. Bentley, T. (1998). Learning beyond the classroom: Education for a changing world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwisle, & J. Van Merriënboer (Eds.), Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 73–78). Oxford: Elseiver Science.Google Scholar
  14. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reaching every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  15. Birenbaum, M. (2002). Assessing self-directed active learning in primary schools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9(1), 119–138.Google Scholar
  16. Boekaerts, M. (1988). Motivated learning: Bias in appraisals. International Journal of Educational Research, 12, 267–280.Google Scholar
  17. Boticki, I., Baksa, J., Seow, P., & Looi, C.-K. (2015). Usage of a mobile social learning platform with virtual badges in a primary school. Computers & Education, 86, 120–136.Google Scholar
  18. Boyer, S. L., Artis, A. B., Solomon, P., & Fleming, D. E. (2012). Improving sales performance with self-directed learning. Marketing Management Journal, 22, 61–75.Google Scholar
  19. Bozkurt, A. (2017). Augmented reality with mobile and ubiquitous learning: Immersive, enriched, situated, and seamless learning Experiences. In S. N. Şad & M. Ebner (Eds.), Digital Tools for Seamless Learning (pp. 27–41). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  20. Brooke, R., Coyle, D., Walden, A., Healey, C., Larson, K., Laughridge, V., … Williams, S. (2005). Finding a space for professional development: Creating thirdspace through after-school writing groups. Language Arts, 82(5), 367-377.Google Scholar
  21. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43, 17–32.Google Scholar
  22. Burden, K. (2017). A model of mobile knowledge-building with apps for pre-service teacher education. In N. Kucirkova & G. Falloon (Eds.), Apps, technology and younger learners: International evidence for teaching (pp. 265–279). Oxon, OX: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Chan, T.-W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., … Hoppe, U. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29.Google Scholar
  24. Charitonos, K., Blake, C., Scanlon, E., & Jones, A. (2012). Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (How) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 802–819.Google Scholar
  25. Collins, A., Fischer, G., Barron, B., Liu, C.-C., & Spada, H. (2009). Long-tail learning: A unique opportunity for CSCL? Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Rhodes Island, Greece.Google Scholar
  26. Cosnefroy, L., & Carré, P. (2014). Self-regulated and self-directed leaning: Why don’t some neighbors communicate? International Journal of Self-directed Learning, 11(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  27. Cussins, A. (1992). Content, embodiement and objectivity: The theory of cognitive trails. Mind, 101, 651–688.Google Scholar
  28. De Waard, I. (2016). Self-directed learning of adult experienced online learners enrolled in FutureLearn MOOCs. Ph.D., Open University, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  29. De Waard, I., Keskin, N. O., & Koutropoulos, A. (2014). Exploring future seamless learning research strands for massive open online courses. In T. Volkan Yuzer & G. Eby (Eds.), Handbook of research on emerging priorities and trends in distance education: Communication, pedagogy, and technology (pp. 201–216). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  30. Deng, Y.-C., Lin, T., Kinshuk, & Chan, T.-W. (2006). Component exchange community: A model of utilizing research components to foster international collaboration. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 218–231.Google Scholar
  31. Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129.Google Scholar
  32. Domik, G., & Fischer, G. (2011). Transdisciplinary collaboration and lifelong learning: Fostering and supporting new learning opportunities. In C. S. Calude, G. Rozenberg, & A. Salomaa (Eds.), Rainbow of computer science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 6570, pp. 129–143). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Du, X., Wang, Y., Du, W., & Feng, A. (2012). Discussion on social network learning from the long tail. Paper presented at the International Conference on Future Computer Supported Education 2012, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  34. Edwards, D. (2008). Artscience: Creativity in the post-google generation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25.Google Scholar
  36. Engeström, Y. (2004). Collaborative intentionality capital: Object-oriented interchangency in multiorganizational fields. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 11–21.Google Scholar
  37. Engeström, Y. (2009). Wildfire activities: New patterns of mobility and learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  38. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1998). Free-choice learning: An alternative term to informal learning. Informal Learning Environments Research Newsletter, 2(1), 2.Google Scholar
  39. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  40. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, D. R. (2004). The contextual model of learning. In G. Anderson (Ed.), Reinventing the museum: Historical and contemporary perspectives on the paradigm shift (p. 139). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  41. FitzGerald, E. (2012). Creating user-generated content for location-based learning: An authoring framework. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 28(3), 195–207.Google Scholar
  42. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Grow, G. O. (1991). The staged self-directed learning model. In H. Long (Ed.), Self-directed learning: Consensus & conflict. Norman, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  44. Grow, G. O. (1994). In defense of the staged self-directed learning model. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(2), 109–114.Google Scholar
  45. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.Google Scholar
  46. Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Retrieved from http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm.
  47. Hattie, J., Biggs, J. B., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.Google Scholar
  48. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsch, D. (2002). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the New Millennium (pp. 75–94). New York: ACM Press, Addison.Google Scholar
  49. Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, S.-Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.Google Scholar
  50. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25–39.Google Scholar
  51. Karrer, T. (2008). Corporate long tail learning and attention crisis. Retrieved from http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2008/02/corporate-learning-long-tail-and.html.
  52. Kenyon, C., & Hase, S. (2001). Moving from andragogy to heutagogy in vocational education. Retrieved from http://www.avetra.org.au/abtracts_and_papers_2001/Hase_Kenyon_full.pdf.
  53. Klamma, R. (2010). Emerging research topics in social learning. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  54. Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York: Associated Press.Google Scholar
  55. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York City: Association Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. College Student Development, 37(2), 135–148.Google Scholar
  57. Kurti, A., Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Bridging outdoors and indoors educational activities in schools with the support of mobile and positioning technologies. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(2), 166–186.Google Scholar
  58. Lai, C.-H., Yang, J.-C., Chen, F.-C., Ho, C.-W., & Chan, T.-W. (2007). Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: The interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(4), 326–337.Google Scholar
  59. Laru, J., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Integrated use of multiple social software tool and face-to-face activities to support self-regulated learning: A case study in a higher education context. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 471–484). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Law, J., & Lynch, M. (1988). Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing: Birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity. Human Studies, 11(2/3), 271–304.Google Scholar
  61. Liu, P.-L., & Chen, C.-J. (2015). Learning English through actions: A study of mobile-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 158–171.Google Scholar
  62. London, M. (2011). Lifelong Learning: Introduction. In M. London (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 3–11). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., & Milrad, M. (2015). Guest editorial: Special issue on seamless, ubiquitous, and contextual learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 2–4.Google Scholar
  64. Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Zhang, B. H., So, H.-J., Chen, W., & Wong, L.-H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 154–169.Google Scholar
  65. Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411–427.Google Scholar
  66. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J., Cook, J., … Robertson, J. (2008). Learner generated contexts: A framework to support the effective use of technology to support learning. Retrieved from http://api.ning.com/files/Ij6j7ucsB9vgb11pKPHU6LKMGQQkR-YDVnxruI9tBGf1Q-eSYUDv-Mil6uWqX4F1jYA1PUkZRXvbxhnxuHusyL1lRXVrBKnO/LGCOpenContextModelning.doc.
  67. Maldonado, H., & Pea, R. (2010). LET’s GO! to the creek: Co-design of water quality inquiry using mobile science collaboratories. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education 2010, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  68. McLaughlin, P., & Mills, A. (2008). Where shall the future student learn? Student expectations of university facilities for teaching and learning. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Teaching and Learning Forum, Perth, WA.Google Scholar
  69. Mortensen, M. F., & Smart, K. (2007). Free-choice worksheets increase students’ exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1389–1414.Google Scholar
  70. Ng, W., & Nicholas, H. (2013). A framework for sustainable mobile learning in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 695–715.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01359.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2015). Mobile seamless learning and its pedagogy. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 261–280). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Ogata, H., Hui, G. L., Yin, C., Ueda, T., Oishi, Y., & Yano, Y. (2008). LOCH: Supporting mobile language learning outside classrooms. Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(3), 271–282.Google Scholar
  73. Ogata, H., Li, M., Hou, B., Uosaki, N., El-Bishouty, M., & Yano, Y. (2011). SCROLL: Supporting to share and reuse ubiquitous learning log in the context of language learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 69–82.Google Scholar
  74. Ogata, H., Hou, B., Li, M., Uosaki, N., Mouri, K., & Liu, S. (2014). Ubiquitous learning project using life-logging technology in Japan. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 85–100.Google Scholar
  75. Otero, N., Milrad, M., Rogers, Y., Santos, A. J., Veríssimo, M., & Torres, N. (2011). Challenges in designing seamless-learning scenarios: Affective and emotional effects on external representations. Mobile Learning and Organisation, 5(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  76. Panadero, E. (2017). Review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422.Google Scholar
  77. Panke, S. (2017). Crossover learning. AACE Review. Retrieved from https://www-dev.aace.org/review/crossover-learning/.
  78. Panke, S., Kohls, C., & Gaise, B. (2017). Social media and seamless learning: Lessons learned. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 26(3), 285–302.Google Scholar
  79. Pappas, C. (2016). Blended learning vs flipped learning: Can you tell the difference? Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/blended-learning-vs-flipped-learning-can-tell-difference.
  80. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  81. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  82. Pushpa, M. (2012). ACO in e-learning: Towards an adaptive learning path. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 4(3), 458–462.Google Scholar
  83. Rastegarmoghadam, M., & Ziarati, K. (2017). Improved modeling of intelligent tutoring systems using ant colony optimization. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1067–1087.Google Scholar
  84. Şad, S. N., & Ebner, M. (Eds.). (2017). Digital tools for seamless learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  85. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in the knowledge age (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  86. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Schuck, S., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2017). Exploring mobile learning in the third space. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 121–137.Google Scholar
  88. Seow, P., So, H.-J., Looi, C.-K., Lim, G., & Wong, K. (2008). Leveraging knowledge building in seamless learning environments. Paper presented at the Workshops at International Conference on Computers in Education 2008, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  89. Seow, P., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Looi, C.-K., & Tan, N. (2009). Designing a seamless learning environment to learn reduce, reuse and recycle in environmental education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 3(1), 60–83.Google Scholar
  90. Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., … Whitelock, D. (2012). Innovating Pedagogy 2012. Retrieved from Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
  91. Sharples, M., Delgado Kloos, C., Dimitriadis, Y., Garlatti, S., & Specht, M. (2015). Mobile and accessible learning for MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
  92. Sharples, M., Adams, A., Alozie, N., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Gaved, M., … Yarnall, L. (2015). Innovating Pedagogy 2015. Retrieved from Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
  93. Sharples, M., Scanlon, E., Ainsworth, S., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T. D., Crook, C., … O’Malley, C. (2015). Personal Inquiry: Orchestrating science investigations within and beyond the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 308-341.Google Scholar
  94. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54.Google Scholar
  95. Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  96. Skerrett, A. (2010). Lolita, Facebook, and the third space of literacy teacher education. Educational Studies, 46(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
  97. So, H.-J., & Tan, E. (2014). Designing the situation for pervasive knowledge building: Future school experiences. In S. C. Tan, H.-J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 123–142). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  98. So, H.-J., Seow, P., & Looi, C.-K. (2009). Location matters: Leveraging knowledge building with mobile devices and Web 2.0 technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 367–382.Google Scholar
  99. So, H.-J., Tan, E., & Tay, J. (2012). Collaborative mobile learning in situ from knowledge building perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 51–62.Google Scholar
  100. Song, Y. (2013). Developing a framework for examining the “niche” for mobile-assisted seamless learning from an ecological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E167–E170.Google Scholar
  101. Song, Y. (2014). “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers & Education, 74, 50–60.Google Scholar
  102. Song, Y., Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2012). Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 679–701.Google Scholar
  103. Steels, L. (1991). Toward a theory of emergent functionality. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior 1991, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  104. Tesoriero, R., Fardoun, H. M., Awada, H., & Raisinghani, M. (2018). Accessing map information using NFC-based user interfaces for in-situ learning environments. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 8(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
  105. Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to intergrate online and traditional learning. London and Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  106. Tissenbaum, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2015). Scripting and orchestration of learning across contexts: A role for intelligent agents and data mining. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 223–257). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  107. Tofield, S., Coll, R. K., Vyle, B., & Bolstad, R. (2003). Zoos as a source of free choice learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(1), 67–99.Google Scholar
  108. Toh, Y., So, H.-J., Seow, P., Chen, W., & Looi, C.-K. (2013). Seamless learning in the mobile age: A theoretical and methodological discussion on using cooperative inquiry to study digital kids on-the-move. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 301–318.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.666250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Toh, Y., So, H.-J., Seow, P., & Chen, W. (2017). Transformation of participation and learning: Three case studies of young learners harnessing mobile technologies for seamless science learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(5), 305–316.Google Scholar
  110. Tynan, B., & Colbran, S. (2006). Podcasting, student learning and expectations. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  111. Underwood, J., Luckin, R., & Winters, N. (2010). miLexicon: Harnessing resources for personal and collaborative language inquiry. Paper presented at the ITEC 2010, London, UK.Google Scholar
  112. Uosaki, N., Ogata, H., Li, M., Hou, B., & Mouri, K. (2013). Guidelines on implementing successful seamless learning environments: A practitioners’ perspective. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 7(2), 44–53.Google Scholar
  113. Van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. (2012). Empowering students as knowledge builders. In L. Rowan & C. Bigum (Eds.), Transformative approaches to new technologies and student diversity in futures oriented classrooms (pp. 85–103). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  114. Van Deur, P., & Murray-Harvey, R. (2005). The inquiry nature of primary schools and students’ self-directed learning knowledge. International Education Journal, 5(5), 166–177.Google Scholar
  115. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  116. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlovsky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  117. Wong, L.-H. (2013). Analysis of students’ after-school mobile-assisted artifact creation processes in a seamless language learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 198–211.Google Scholar
  118. Wong, L.-H. (2015). A brief history of mobile seamless learning. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 3–40). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  119. Wong, L.-H., & Chin, C. K. (2014). “Move, Language Learning!”—Investigating seamless and mobile language learning. Nanjing, China: Nanjing University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2009). Adaptable learning pathway generation with ant colony optimization. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 309–326.Google Scholar
  121. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.Google Scholar
  122. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2018). Authentic learning of primary school science in a seamless learning environment: A meta-evaluation of the learning design. In T.-W. Chang, R. Huang, & Kinshuk (Eds.), Authentic learning through advances in technologies (pp. 137–170). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  123. Wong, L.-H., Chen, W., & Jan, M. (2012). How artefacts mediate small group co-creation activities in a mobile-assisted language learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 28(5), 411–424.Google Scholar
  124. Wong, L.-H., Chai, C. S., & Aw, G. P. (2015). What seams do we remove in learning a language: Towards a seamless language learning framework. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 295–318). Springer.Google Scholar
  125. Wong, L.-H., Chai, C. S., Aw, G. P., & King, R. B. (2015). Enculturating seamless language learning through artifact creation and social interaction process. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 130–157.Google Scholar
  126. Wong, L.-H., Milrad, M., & Specht, M. (Eds.). (2015). Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  127. Wong, L.-H., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Liu, M. (2016). Seamlessly learning Chinese: Contextual meaning making and vocabulary growth in a seamless Chinese as a second language learning environment. Instructional Science, 44(5), 399–422.Google Scholar
  128. Wong, L.-H., Chai, C. S., & Aw, G. P. (2017). Seamless language learning: Second language learning with social media. Comunicar, 25(50), 9–21.Google Scholar
  129. Wong, L.-H., Looi, C.-K., & Goh, S. F. (2017). C2FIP: A design framework for streamlining ICT-enhanced seamless science learning for wider diffusion in primary schools. Paper presented at the Workshop Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 2017, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  130. Yang, X., & Chen, J. (2015). Using discovery maps as a free-choice learning process can enhance the effectiveness of environmental education in a botanical garden. Environmental Education Research, 5, 656–674.Google Scholar
  131. Zhang, H., & Maesako, T. (2009). A framework of learner development ecosystem for designing a ubiquitous educational informational infrastructure. Software, 4(2), 124–131.Google Scholar
  132. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.Google Scholar
  133. Zurita, G., & Baloian, N. (2015). Situated learning theory and geo-collaboration for seamless learning. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 183–200). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations