Advertisement

Where Are All the Students? Factors that Encourage Female Participants in Technology Education

  • Vicki KnopkeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Technology Education book series (CITE)

Abstract

Females are significantly underrepresented in technology education classrooms in senior secondary schools. Participation rates for female students in Science, Technology, Mathematics and Engineering (STEM) subjects are lower than those of males. Data show that this has a flow on effect on females entering subjects such as Engineering at the tertiary education level. Williams (Intl J Des Educ 7:1–9, 2011) argues that gender issues in technology education have been under-researched. This chapter aims to identify positive influences that encourage female students to participate in technology education. Using a qualitative, feminist ethnographic case study methodology guided by a sociocultural framework, the study aims to demonstrate how classroom teachers may take steps to engage young female learners in technology education.

References

  1. Autio, O. (2013). When talent is not enough: Why technologically talented women are not studying technology. Journal of Technology Education, 24(2), 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M. V., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. J. (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T., & Douglas, D. G. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  5. Blackmore, J. (2011). Leadership in pursuit of purpose: Social, economic, and political transformation. In C. M. Shields (Ed.), Transformative leadership: A reader (p. 2136). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Boe, M. V., Henriksen, E., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37–72.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brizendine, L. (2006). The female brain. New York: Random House LLC.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up digital, how the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning (New Rochelle, NY), 32(2), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, C., & Jane, B. (2012). Motivating children to learn: The role of technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dakers, J. R. (2006). Defining technological literacy (p. 352). Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053
  12. Dakers, J. R., Dow, W., & McNamee, L. (2009). De-constructing technology’s masculinity: Discovering a missing pedagogy in technology education. International Journal of Technology Design Education, 19, 381–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9099-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danilova, E. A., & Pudlowski, Z. J. (2010). Public understanding of engineering: Consequences and solutions. In 1st WIETE annual conference on engineering and technology education Pattaya, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.WIETE.com.au/conferences/1st_wiete/5-04-Danilova.pdf
  14. De Vries, M. J., Custer, R., Dakers, J., & Martin, G. (2007). Differentiation in the technology education classroom. In M. J. De Vries, R. Custer, J. Dakers, & G. Martin (Eds.), Analysing best practices in technology education (pp. 235–245). Sense: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Dugger, W. E. (1997). The next step. Technology Teacher, 56, 10–19.Google Scholar
  16. Ekert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Klapwijk, R., & Rommes, E. (2009). Career orientation of secondary school students (m/f) in the Netherlands. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 403418.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9095-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knopke, V. (2012). Gender and technology education: Some theoretical implications. Paper presented at the explorations of best practice in technology in design & engineering education, technology education research conference, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Knopke, V. (2015). Factors that encourage and facilitate female students to participate and engage in technology education. Nathan: Griffith University.Google Scholar
  22. Knopke, V., & de la Barra, B. L. (2013). Motivational factors in female senior secondary students: staying and thriving on the technology education pipeline. Technology education for the future: A play on sustainability.Google Scholar
  23. Kolmos, A., Mejlgaard, N., Haase, S., & Holgaard, J. E. (2013). Motivational factors, gender and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 340358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lingard, B., & Keddie, A. (2013). Redistribution, recognition and representation: Working against pedagogies of indifference. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21, 427 Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marra, R. M., Rogers Kelly, A., Shen, D., & Barbara, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(January), 11.Google Scholar
  26. MCEETYA, Ministerial Council on Education Employment and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne declaration on education goals for young Australians. Canberra: Ministerial Council on Education Employment and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  27. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “case study research in education”. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.Google Scholar
  28. Oldenziel, R. (2003). Why masculine technologies matter. In N. E. Lerman, R. Oldenziel, & A. Mohun (Eds.), Gender and technology (pp. 37–71). Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Paechter, C. (1998). Educating the other: Gender, power and schooling. London: Flamer Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pavlova, M., & Turner, S. (2007). It’s never too early: Education for sustainable development, the international journal of environmental, cultural, economic and social sustainability. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384.Google Scholar
  31. Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education, theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill, Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
  32. Pole, C., & Morrison, M. (2003). Ethnography for education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ritz, J. (2009). A new generation of goals for technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(2), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Siemens, G. (2006). Learning ecology, communities, and networks: Extending the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/learning_communities.htm
  36. Spender, D. (Ed.). (1985). Man-made language. London/Boston: Routledge/Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  37. Thaler, A., & Zorn, I. (2010). Issues of doing gender and doing technology–music as an 445- innovative theme for technology education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toren, C. (1996). Ethnography: Theoretical background. In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 102–112). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  39. Wajcman, J. (2004). Technofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, J. P. (2011). Research in technology education: Looking back to move forward. International Journal of Design Education, 7(May), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798011-9170-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Willis, J., Thompson, A., & Sadera, W. (1999). Research on technology and teacher education: Current status and future directions. ETR & D, 47(4), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (Vol. 5, 3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Zuga, K. F. (1996). Reclaiming the voices of female and elementary school educators in technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 33(3), 23.Google Scholar
  44. Zuga, K. (2007). Stem and technology education. White Paper written for ITEA, 6. Retrieved from https:/iteea.org/mbraonly/library/whitepaper/STEM(Zuga)pdfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations