Advertisement

Nests

  • Sarah CrinallEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Children: Global Posthumanist Perspectives and Materialist Theories book series (CGPPMT)

Abstract

My skin is bare and chilled. My toes are warm in slippers. I am sitting at the dinner table in the silent dark looking into the research blog. It is brimming with nests. (In this chapter) I am looking in to remember the disruptive, creative practice of blogging with the words space, place , body as my frame. I will speak about my how research has generated a new sense of sustenance in life for me, blurring the space between me and the place I live, through the creative disruptions of blogging.

References

  1. Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of space. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, J., & McCabe, C. (2011). Integrating sustainability. In D. Wright, C. E. Camden-Pratt, & S. B. Hill (Eds.), Social ecology: Applying ecological understanding to our lives and our planet (pp. 99–110). Gloucestershire, UK: Hawthorn Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bowers, C. A. (2008). Why a critical pedagogy of place is an oxymoron. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, P. (2004). Material thinking. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy?. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (D. W. Smith, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  7. Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature and power. London, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003a). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003b). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubert. (2016). Planes of immanence. Retrieved from http://www.christianhubert.com/writings/plane_of_immanence.html. Accessed July 24, 2016.
  13. Hultman, K., & Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koro-Ljungberg, M., MacLure, M., & Ulmer, J. (2018). D… a… t… a…, data++, data, and some problematics. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 462–484). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Linnaeus, C. (1751). Philosophia botanica. In qua explicantur fundamenta botanica cum definitionibus partium, exemplis terminorum, observationibus rariorum, adjectis figuris aeneis. Stockholm: G. Kiesewetter.Google Scholar
  16. NCSU. (2018). Classification of humans. Retrieved February 18, 2018 from https://projects.ncsu.edu/cals/course/zo150/mozley/humans.html.
  17. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: Autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Somerville, M. (1999). Body/landscape journals. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations