One Belt One Road Project is a Driving Force for Holistic Development of Eurasian Region: Challenges to Bangladesh

  • Profulla C. Sarker


The One Belt One Road (OBOR) project is a driving force to strengthening integration and cooperation for ‘holistic development’ in terms of economic, political and social development involving the Eurasian countries. China has already declared to build mega infrastructural projects within the Belt and Road areas to increase trade for regional economic development through cultural assimilation and political tolerance irrespective of political ideology, religion and ethnic identity of the individual state. Bangladesh along with the other neighboring countries has already expressed interest in actively participating in OBOR. The regional corridor is now in the final stage keeping in view to ensuring participation and integration of the member states for ‘holistic development’ to improve the quality of life and well being of the peoples of this region. The main thrust of this paper is to examine to what extent the One Belt One Road project may contribute for ‘holistic development of this region applying the approach of economic cooperation, political tolerance, and cultural relativism’ avoiding the ‘ethnocentric attitude’ among the nation states.


Holistic Development One Belt One Road (OBOR) OBOR Initiative China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Bangladesh China India Myanmar (BCIM) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Dasgupta, S. (2014). Plan for economic corridor linking India to China Approved. Times of India. Retrieved June 9, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Irzli, M., & Nicolas J. (2015). China’s AIIB, America’s Pivot to Asia & the Geopolitics of Infrastructure Investments. Revue Analyse Financière. Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Lal, N. (2013). India and China seek economic integration via Burma, Bangladesh. The Irrawady. Retrieved July 2, 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Laskar, R. H. (2015). India, Pakistan spar over economic corridor passing through PoK. Hindustan Times (India), June 1Google Scholar
  5. Lee, S. M. (2007). Information technology and economic development strategy. In D. A. Rondinelli & J. M. Hefferon (Eds.), Gobalization & change in Asia. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Mandhana, N. (2016). India, Afghanistan and Iran sign deal for transport corridor. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  7. Peter, B. G., & Pirre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rahman, M. (2014). BCIM-economic corridor: An emerging opportunity. Transcom Group. Retrieved June 9, 2014.
  9. Saran, S., & Ritika, P. (2016). Seizing the ‘one belt, one road’ opportunity. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, J.M. (2016). China-South Asia Relations. China Economic and Security Review Commission. Testimony.Google Scholar
  11. Wickremesinghe, R. (2010). World economic power sifting back to Asia from the west. Paper presented in the Rotary International South Asian Conference, Bangkok.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Profulla C. Sarker
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal University of DhakaDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations