Equity and Excellence in East Asian High-Performing Education Systems – A Paradoxical Relationship?

  • Siao See Teng
  • Maria Manzon
  • Kenneth K. Poon
Part of the Education Innovation Series book series (EDIN)


A number of East Asian education systems (e.g. Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Shanghai, Singapore and Taiwan) have gained international prominence over the years, due to their rapid climbs to top positions in international tests such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). For example, Hong Kong was placed 17th in PIRLS reading literacy, and Singapore ranked 15th in 2001, but within 5 years, they garnered 2nd and 4th places in 2006, respectively. In the 2015 PISA results, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taipei, Japan and Beijing-Shanghai-Jiangsu-Guangzhou (B-S-J-G), China, were top achievers (OECD, Report on PISA 2015: results in focus. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2016).

The sterling report cards of these East Asian systems, combined with the declining performance of western systems such as those of the United Kingdom and the United States, have led the West to a “look East” drive for inspiration. Whether it be scholarly publications or media articles, much literature has been generated on the “success” of education in East Asia, which has become “the new ‘poster boy’ in the global discourse of education policy borrowing” (You and Morris, Compare 46(6), 2016, p. 883).

Increasingly, a good education system is considered one that not only produces high achievements but is also equitable in terms of the distribution of its success across the system and its student population. Perhaps a more nuanced understanding of these East Asian education systems could be facilitated if we could examine them considering both equity and quality issues, since the pursuit of each often affects the other. The chapters in this book illustrate that excellence and equity are not independent and separate but can be paradoxically intertwined.


  1. Altbach, P., & Umakoshi, T. (2004). Asian universities: Historical perspectives and contemporary challenges. Baltimore: John Hopkin University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Towards deimperialization. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chong, T. (2014). Vocational education in Singapore: Meritocracy and hidden narratives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(5), 637–648.Google Scholar
  4. Chua, V., Tan, E.S., & Koh, G. (2017). A study on social capital in Singapore. Singapore, Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies. Retrieved from
  5. Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hannum, E. P. H., & Goto-Butler, Y. (2010). Globalisation, changing demographics, and educational challenges in East Asia. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holsinger, D. B., & Jacob, W. J. (2008). Inequality in education: Comparative and international perspectives. Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Springer and Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  8. Koh, A. (2014). Doing class analysis in Singapore’s elite education: Unravelling the smokescreen of ‘meritocratic talk’. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, H. L. (2011). Speech by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the debate on the president’s address, 20 October 2011 at Parliament. Singapore, Singapore: Prime Minister’s Office. Retrieved from
  10. Lee, W. O., & Manzon, M. (2014). The issue of equity and quality of education in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lim, L. (2013). Meritocracy, elitism, and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mok, K. H. (2006). Education reform and education policy in East Asia. New York: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. OECD. (2008). Policy brief: Organisation for economic co-operation and development. Retrieved from
  14. OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  15. OECD. (2016). Report on PISA 2015: Results in focus. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  16. Ong, Y. K. (2018). Speech by Mr Ong Ye Kung, Minister for Education, at the debate of president’s address: “The Unfinished Business of Tackling Inequality”. Singapore, Singapore: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  17. Tan, E. (2003). Re-engaging Chineseness: Political, economic and cultural imperatives of nation-building in Singapore. China Quarterly, 175, 751–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Teh, L. W. (2014). Singapore’s performance in PISA: Levelling up the long tail. In S. K. Lee et al. (Eds.), Educational policy innovations: Levelling up and sustaining educational achievement (Education innovation book series). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Wang, L.-Y., Teng, S. S., & Tan, C. S. (2014). Levelling up low students (NIE working paper series no.3). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  20. You, Y., & Morris, P. (2016). Imagining school autonomy in high-performing education systems: East Asia as a source of policy referencing in England. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(6), 882–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siao See Teng
    • 1
  • Maria Manzon
    • 2
  • Kenneth K. Poon
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of International Education and Lifelong LearningThe Education University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations