Transport Policies and Planning in Bandung

  • Suryani Eka Wijaya
  • Muhammad Imran


Rapid urbanisation, fast economic growth and high-density urban form created urban transport challenges in Bandung, which traditionally responded by widening existing and building new roads. The resulting increase in motorisation caused an eventual decline of public transport and increasing air pollution. This chapter investigates transport-related decision-making in Bandung and puts urban transport, spatial planning, development planning and climate change policies under a spotlight to trace how Bandung’s BRT project was initiated by central government and carried out by the city government. The central government’s decision to introduce BRT as ‘a pilot project’ had financial consequences for the Bandung city government. The BRT development as a whole did not take account of the socio-political situation in Bandung, where local politicians were keen to carry out a BRT project, while local transport operators strongly resisted this initiative. The BRT project in Bandung aims to improve the quality of public transport services to enhance public transport’s safety, comfort, punctuality and overall quality while charging affordable fares. However, angkot drivers, who perceived they might lose their livelihood, resisted the project in a citywide protest. This resistance caused the BRT project to be developed in the urban periphery, making the project unattractive to residents. This chapter shows the important role of local political dynamics and of engaging community organisations in policy implementation at the local level.


BRT in Bandung City ORGANDA Angkot Socio-political tensions 


  1. Alamanda, D. T., Putro, U. S., Hermawan, P., & Utomo, D. S. (2010). Graph model for conflict resolution in Trans Metro Bandung. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 9(2), 212–225.Google Scholar
  2. Angel, S., Parent, J., Civco, D. L., & Blei, A. M. (2011). Making room for a planet of cities. Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  3. Arifwidodo, S. D., & Perera, R. (2011). Quality of life and compact development policies in Bandung, Indonesia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(2), 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandung City Government. (2001). Development programme of Bandung City Year 2000–2004 (Local regulation No. 09/2001). Bandung: City planning development agency of Bandung.Google Scholar
  5. Bandung City Government. (2009). TMB will operate after Eid celebration (TMB beroperasi setelah lebaran). Bandung: Bandung City Government.Google Scholar
  6. Bandung City Government. (2011a). Bandung: Kecamatan profile climate and disaster resilience. Bandung: Bandung City Government, Kyoto University, Institut Teknologi Bandung.Google Scholar
  7. Bandung City Government. (2011b). Medium-term development planning 2009–2013 (Local regulation No. 08/2011). Bandung: City planning development agency of Bandung.Google Scholar
  8. Bandung City Government. (2011c). Spatial plan of Bandung City 2011–2031 (Local regulation No 18/2011). Bandung: City planning development agency of Bandung.Google Scholar
  9. Bandung City Government. (2012). Health profile of Bandung City year 2011. Bandung: Health Department of Bandung City.Google Scholar
  10. Bandung Development Planning Agency. (2009). Transportation masterplan of Bandung City. Bandung: City Development Planning Agency.Google Scholar
  11. BCCF. (2014). Design thinking. Retrieved from Accessed 13 May 2014.
  12. Bureau of Statistics of Bandung City. (2014). Bandung City in figure 2013. In. Bandung: Bureau of Statistics of Bandung City.Google Scholar
  13. Corfee-Morlot, J., Cochran, I., Hallegatte, S., & Teasdale, P. J. (2011). Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Climatic Change, 104(1), 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DAMRI. (2014). DAMRI pioneer of Go-Green campaign. Retrieved from Accessed 14 Oct 2014.
  15. Djatnika, A. H., Indrawati, D., Don, S. A. (2015, August 3–4). Prices analysis of Trans Metro Bandung (TMB) under ATP, WTP and society travel behaviour of Bandung city. Paper presented at the Indonesian Regional Science Association (IRSA) International Institute, Bali.Google Scholar
  16. DPRD Bandung City. (2014). Wahana Tata Nugraha Award. Retrieved from Accessed 15 Sept 2014.
  17. Dunlop, C. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Environmental Agency of Bandung City. (2012). Environmental status report 2012. Bandung: Environmental Agency of Bandung City.Google Scholar
  19. Firman, T. (1996). Urban development in Bandung metropolitan region: A transformation to a Desa-Kota region. Third World Planning Review, 18(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Firman, T. (2009). The continuity and change in mega-urbanisation in Indonesia: A survey of Jakarta-Bandung Region (JBR) development. Habitat International, 33(4), 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Government of Indonesia. (2008). National spatial plan (Government regulation No. 26/2008) Jakarta: Ministry of Public Works.Google Scholar
  22. Government of West Java Province. (2004). West Java in figure 2003. Bandung: Bureau of Statistics of West Java Province.Google Scholar
  23. Government of West Java Province. (2010). Spatial planning of West Java Province 2009–2029 (Local regulation No. 22/2010). Bandung: Government of West Java Province.Google Scholar
  24. Government of West Java Province. (2011). West Java in Figure 2011. Bandung: Regional Development Planning Agency of West Java Province and Statistics of West Java Province.Google Scholar
  25. Government of West Java Province. (2012). Local regulation No. 56/2012 on Climate action plan for West Java Province. Bandung: Government of West Java Province.Google Scholar
  26. Government of West Java Province. (2013). West Java in Figure 2012. Bandung: Regional Development Planning Agency of West Java Province and Statistics of West Java Province.Google Scholar
  27. Hermawan, P., Alamanda, D. T., Putro, U. S., & Utomo, D. S. (2010). Trans Metro Bandung conflict resolution using graph model for conflict resolution and value net of coopetition. Paper presented at the Pan-Pacific Conference XXVII, Bali.Google Scholar
  28. Hudalah, D., Winarso, H., & Woltjer, J. (2007). Peri-urbanisation in East Asia: A new challenge for planning? International Development Planning Review, 29(4), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Indie, R. (2013). Angkot Day. Retrieved from Accessed 15 Jul 2014.
  30. ITDP. (2013). Addressing transport concerns in “Java’s Paris”: A visit to Bandung, Indonesia. Retrieved from Accessed 12 Apr 2014.
  31. Joewono, T. B., & Kubota, H. (2005). The characteristics of paratransit and non-motorized transport in Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EASTS), 6, 262–277.Google Scholar
  32. KPPU. (2009). Background paper: policy analysis of competition in land transport industry in Indonesia. Jakarta: Business Competition Control Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha).Google Scholar
  33. LPPM-ITB. (2010). Feasibility study for corridors development for Trans Metro Bandung’s routes. Bandung: The Research Centre for Community Development, Institute of Technology Bandung (LPPM-ITB).Google Scholar
  34. McKinsey Global Institute. (2012). The archipelago economy: Unleashing Indonesia’s potential. Jakarta: McKinsey Global Insitute.Google Scholar
  35. Meakin, R. (2004). Bus regulation and planning, Module 3c in Sustainable transport: A sourcebook for policy-makers in developing cities. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of National Development Planning. (2011). Guideline for developing local action plan for greenhouse gas emission reduction (RAD-GRK). Jakarta: Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia (BAPPENAS).Google Scholar
  37. Ministry of Transport. (2009). Urban transport master plan for Bandung Metropolitan Area (BMA). Retrieved from Accessed 5 Oct 2014.
  38. Ministry of Transport. (2012). Minimum service standard for road-based mass transport (No: PM 10/2012). Jakarta: Ministry of Transport Republic Indonesia.Google Scholar
  39. Nugroho, S. B., Zusman, E., Nakano, R., & Jaeger, A. (2014). Vertically integrating low carbon transport in Indonesia: A case study of Bus Rapid Transit in Bandung and Palembang (Vol. 2014). Hayama-Kanagawa: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).Google Scholar
  40. Oktora, S. (2013). Public transport in Bandung will become a history soon. Retrieved from Accessed 5 May 2015.
  41. Pikiran Rakyat. (2008a, December 23). Mayor decided to delay the TMB Project for three month: Violent protest during TMB’s trial (Walikota putuskan penundaan tiga bulan: Uji coba TMB rusuh). Pikiran Rakyat.Google Scholar
  42. Pikiran Rakyat. (2008b, June 7). Ministry of Transport will “get rid” of 500.000 Angkot (Dephub akan “gusur” 500.000 Angkot). Pikiran Rakyat. Retrieved from Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
  43. Pikiran Rakyat. (2008c, December 15). TMB’s launch next week (TMB diujicoba pekan depan). Pikiran Rakyat. Retrieved from Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
  44. Pikiran Rakyat. (2008d). TMB operational postponed for three months (Operasional TMB ditangguhkan selama tiga bulan). Pikiran Rakyat. Retrieved from http://www.pikiran-rakyat/node/81460. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
  45. Pikiran Rakyat. (2011). Shelter Trans Metro Bandung is targeted to be done at the end of August 2011. Pikiran Rakyat. Retrieved from http://www.pikiran-rakyat/node/152679. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
  46. Pikiran Rakyat. (2012). TMB as a failure project (Trans Metro Bandung proyek gagal). Pikiran Rakyat. Retrieved from http://www.pikiran-rakyat/node/180856. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
  47. Republic of Indonesia. (2004). Law No. 25 year 2004 on National Development Planning System. Jakarta: Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia (BAPPENAS).Google Scholar
  48. Robin, A. (2012, March 16). Operational failures of TMB corridor 1 (TMB koridor 1 gagal beroperasi). Pakuan. Retrieved from Accessed 12 Feb 2014.
  49. Sutomo, H., Romero, J., & Zusman, E. (2012). The co-benefits of Jakarta’s bus rapid transit: Getting the institutions right. In E. Zusman, S. Srinivasan, & S. Dhakal (Eds.), Low carbon transport in Asia: Strategies for optimizing co-benefits (pp. 191–210). Oxon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  50. Suwarni, Y. T. (2008, December 23). Bus drivers attack Bandung authorities. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from Accessed 11 Jan 2015.
  51. Tarigan, A. M., Susilo, Y. O., & Joewono, T. B. (2014). Segmentation of paratransit users based on service quality and travel behaviour in Bandung, Indonesia. Transportation Planning and Technology, 37(2), 200–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. The Jakarta Post. (2009). Minivan drivers protest Bandung busway. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from Accessed 11 Oct 2014.
  53. Traffic Police of Bandung City. (2013). Traffic accident report in Bandung City. Bandung: Traffic Police of Bandung City.Google Scholar
  54. Transport Department of Bandung City. (2013). Road transport report. Bandung: Transport Department of Bandung City.Google Scholar
  55. UNEP. (2010). Final mid-term evaluation report on UNEP/GEF Project GF/4010-07-01 (4960) Bus Rapid Transit and pedestrian improvements in Jakarta. Retrieved from Accessed 11 Feb 2014 .

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suryani Eka Wijaya
    • 1
  • Muhammad Imran
    • 2
  1. 1.BAPPEDA of NTB ProvinceMataramIndonesia
  2. 2.Massey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations