Advertisement

Conceptualising Policy Tensions in LIA Cities

  • Suryani Eka Wijaya
  • Muhammad Imran
Chapter

Abstract

LIA cities are often governed through structures that operate at multiple levels. This approach to governance, where powerful organisations and actors set agendas and influence policy directions, causes policy-making processes to become complex. In this chapter we discuss the concepts of power, legitimacy, communication and participation in the multi-level governance structure of LIA cities. Four categories – financial-institutional, socio-political, discursive and communication and participation – help us grasp the underlying causes of policy tensions found at multiple levels in BRT policies and projects in LIA cities. They shed light on the types of power that organisations have and on how that power is exercised to advance BRT projects and to gain legitimacy in the planning process.

Keywords

Multi-level governance Power Communication Public participation Multi-level tensions 

References

  1. ADB. (2006). Fostering public participation in budget makings: Case studies from Indonesia, the Marshal Islands, and Pakistan. Manila: Asian Development Bank and the Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Q. I., Lu, H., & Ye, S. (2008). Urban transportation and equity: A case study of Beijing and Karachi. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 125–139.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, J. (2009). Three spaces of power: Territory, networks, plus a topological twist in the tale of domination and authority. Journal of Power, 2(2), 197–212.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, C. W., & de Vries, M. S. (2007). High expectations, varying outcomes: Decentralization and participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 425–451.Google Scholar
  5. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
  6. Asri, D. U. (2005). Participatory planning toward an integrated transportation masterplan for Jabodetabek. The Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 2308–2319.Google Scholar
  7. Ayers, J. (2009). International funding to support urban adaptation to climate change. Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 225–240.Google Scholar
  8. Bache, I. (2008). Researching multi-level governance. Paper presented at the The CINEFOGO/University of Trento Conference on The Governance of the European Union: Theories, practices, and myths, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Bache, I. (2010). Building multi-level governance in Southeast Europe? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(1), 111–122.Google Scholar
  10. Bache, I., & Chapman, R. (2008). Democracy through multilevel governance? The implementation of the structural funds in South Yorkshire. Governance, 21(3), 397–418.Google Scholar
  11. Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Backstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24–41.Google Scholar
  13. Bakker, S., & Huizenga, C. (2010). Making climate instruments work for sustainable transport in developing countries. Natural Resources Forum, 34(4), 314–326.Google Scholar
  14. Benz, A., & Eberlein, B. (1999). The Europeanization of regional policies: Patterns of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 329–348.Google Scholar
  15. Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., & Walker, G. (2002). Transport planning and participation: The rhetoric and realities of public involvement. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(1), 31–73.Google Scholar
  16. Blunch, N. H., Sudharshan, C., & Dhushyanth, R. (2001). The informal sector revisited: A synthesis across space and time. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  17. Boyd, E., Grist, N., Juhola, S., & Nelson, V. (2009). Exploring development futures in a changing climate: Frontiers for development policy and practice. Development and Policy Review, 27(6), 659–674.Google Scholar
  18. Bridge, G. (2009). Reason in the city? Communicative action, media and urban politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 237–240.Google Scholar
  19. Brinkerhoff, D. W. (1999). State-civil society networks for policy implementation in developing countries. Policy Studies Review, 16(1), 123–147.Google Scholar
  20. Burton, P. (2009). Conceptual, theoretical and practical issues in measuring the benefits of public participation. Evaluation, 15(3), 263–284.Google Scholar
  21. Carr, B. (2012). Australia’s international development assistance program 2012-13: Helping the world’s poor implementing effective aid. Canberra: Australian Ministry for Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  22. Corfee-Morlot, J., Cochran, I., Hallegatte, S., & Teasdale, P. J. (2011). Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Climatic Change, 104(1), 169–197.Google Scholar
  23. Craik, N., Doelle, M., & Gale, F. (2012). Governing information: A three dimensional analysis of environmental assessment. Public Administration, 90(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  24. Daniell, K. A., Máñez Costa, M. A., Ferrand, N., Kingsborough, A. B., Coad, P., & Ribarova, I. S. (2011). Aiding multi-level decision-making processes for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Regional Environmental Change, 11(2), 243–258.Google Scholar
  25. De Oliveira, J. A. P. (2009). The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level: An analysis of three countries. Habitat International, 33(3), 253–259.Google Scholar
  26. De Vera, R., & Kim, Y. H. (2003). Local government finance, private resources, and local credit markets in Asia (Vol. 46. ERD Woking Paper Series). Manila: Asian Development Bank (ADB).Google Scholar
  27. Emberger, G., Pfaffenbichler, P., Jaensirisak, S., & Timms, P. (2008). “Ideal” decision-making processes for transport planning: A comparison between Europe and South East Asia. Transport Policy, 15(6), 341–349.Google Scholar
  28. Ernst, J. P., & Sutomo, H. (2010). BRT’s influence on public transport improvements in Indonesian cities. Built Environment, 36(3), 344–352.Google Scholar
  29. Escobar, A. (1988). Power and visibility: Development and the invention and management of the Third World. Cultural Anthropology, 3(4), 428–443.Google Scholar
  30. Estache, A., & Fay, M. (2007). Current debates on infrastructure policy (Policy Research Working Paper No. 4410) Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  31. European Commission. (2001). White paper on European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide. Luxembourg: The European Union.Google Scholar
  32. Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 161–173.Google Scholar
  33. Fengler, W. (2007). Spending for development: Making the most of Indonesia’s new opportunities. Jakarta: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  34. Firman, T. (2009). Decentralization reform and local government proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a fragmentation of regional development. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 21(2 3), 143–157.Google Scholar
  35. Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Bringing power to planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(4), 353–366.Google Scholar
  36. Forester, J. (1984). Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 44(1), 23–31.Google Scholar
  37. Frank, J. D., Longhofer, W., & Schofer, E. (2007). World society, NGOs and environmental policy reform in Asia. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48(4), 275–295.Google Scholar
  38. Gallemore, C., Gregorio, M. D., Moeliono, M., Brockhaus, M., & Prasti, R. D. (2015). Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 114, 168–179.Google Scholar
  39. Gaventa, J. (2002). Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. IDS Bulletin, 33(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  40. Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33.Google Scholar
  41. Gordon, R., & Li, W. (2009). Tax structures in developing countries: Many puzzles and a possible explanation. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7), 855–866.Google Scholar
  42. Guastaferro, B., & Moschella, M. (2012). The EU, the IMF, and the representative turn: Addressing the challenge of legitimacy. Swiss Political Science Review, 18(2), 199–219.Google Scholar
  43. Gudmundsson, H., Hall, R. P., Marsden, G., & Zietsman, J. (2016). Sustainable transportation: Indicators, frameworks, and performance management. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Hadiz, R. V. (2010). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Healey, P. (1993). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. In F. Frank & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 233–253). London: University College London.Google Scholar
  46. Ho, T. V. T., Cottrell, A., Valentine, P., & Woodley, S. (2012). Perceived barriers to effective multi-level governance of human-natural systems: An analysis of marine protected areas in Vietnam. Journal of Political Ecology, 19, 18.Google Scholar
  47. Hossain, M. (2006). The issues and realities of BRT planning initiatives in developing Asian cities. Journal of Public Transportation, 9(3), 69–87.Google Scholar
  48. Ibabao, R. A. (2013). Emerging planning practices of civil society groups in Iloilo City, Philippines and their implications for planning theory. (Unpublished Thesis in the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Management), Lincoln University, Christchurch.Google Scholar
  49. Imran, M. (2010). Institutional barriers to sustainable urban transport in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Imran, M., & Low, N. (2007). Institutional, technical and discursive path dependence in transport planning in Pakistan. International Development Planning Review, 29(3), 319–352.Google Scholar
  51. Internet World Stats. (2012). Top 20 countries in the internet by number of users on June 30, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/top20.htm. Accessed 7 Mar 2013.
  52. Jordan, A. (2001). The European Union: An evolving system of multi-level governance... or government? Policy & Politics, 29(2), 193–208.Google Scholar
  53. Kash, G., & Hidalgo, D. (2014). The promise and challenges of integrating public transportation in Bogota: Colombia. Public Transport, 6, 107–135.Google Scholar
  54. Kern, T. (2010). Translating global values into national contexts: The rise of environmentalism in South Korea. International Sociology, 25(6), 869–896.Google Scholar
  55. Kiggundu, A. T. (2009). Financing public transport systems in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Challenges and prospects. Transportation, 36(3), 275–294.Google Scholar
  56. Kjaer, U. (2013). Local political leadership: The art of circulating political capital. Local Government Studies, 1–20.Google Scholar
  57. Kogdenko, N. (2012). Successfulness of Bus Rapid Transit systems in Asia: Ex-post evaluation. Petten: ECN (Energy research Centre of the Netherlands).Google Scholar
  58. Lewis, B. D., & Oosterman, A. (2009). The impact of decentralization on subnational government fiscal slack in Indonesia. Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(2), 27–47.Google Scholar
  59. Lindgren, K. O., & Persson, T. (2010). Input and output legitimacy: Synergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 449–467.Google Scholar
  60. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.Google Scholar
  61. Marsden, G., Frick, K. T., May, A. D., & Deakin, E. (2012). Bounded rationality in policy learning amongst cities: Lessons from the transport sector. Environment and Planning A, 44(4), 905–920.Google Scholar
  62. Matsumoto, N. (2007). Analysis of policy processes to introduce bus rapid transit systems in Asian cities from the perspective of lesson-drawing: Cases of Jakarta, Seoul, and Beijing. Hayama: The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).Google Scholar
  63. Matsumoto, N., King, P. N., & Mori, H. (2007). Best practice on environmental policy in Asia and the Pacific: Policies for environmentally sustainable transport. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 7(1), 97–116.Google Scholar
  64. Methmann, C. P. (2010). ‘Climate protection’ as empty signifier: A discourse theoretical perspective on climate mainstreaming in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(2), 345–372.Google Scholar
  65. Moravcsik, A. (2002). Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624.Google Scholar
  66. Moretto, L. (2007). Urban governance and multilateral aid organizations: The case of informal water supply systems. The Review of International Organizations, 2(4), 345–370.Google Scholar
  67. Oak, A. (2011). What can talk tell us about design?: Analyzing conversation to understand practice. Design Studies, 32(3), 211–234.Google Scholar
  68. OECD. (2013). Aid statistics, recipient aid at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/recipientcharts.htm. Accessed 15 Feb 2013.
  69. Olowu, D. (2003). Challenge of multi-level governance in developing countries and possible GIS applications. Habitat International, 27(4), 501–522.Google Scholar
  70. Paul, K. T. (2009). Discourse analysis: An exploration of methodological issues and a call for methodological courage in the field of policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies, 3(2), 240–253.Google Scholar
  71. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131–136.Google Scholar
  72. Piattoni, S. (2009). Multi-level governance: A historical and conceptual analysis. Journal of European Integration, 31(2), 163–180.Google Scholar
  73. Qi, Y., Ma, L., Zhang, H., & Li, H. (2008). Translating a global issue into local priority China’s local government response to climate change. The Journal of Environment & Development, 17(4), 379–400.Google Scholar
  74. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political studies, 44(4), 652–667.Google Scholar
  75. Ru, J., & Ortolano, L. (2009). Development of citizen-organized environmental NGOs in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(2), 141–168.Google Scholar
  76. Scharpf, F. W. (2007). Reflections on multilevel legitimacy (Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung working paper No. 07/3). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41671. Accessed 1 Aug 2012.
  77. Scharpf, F. W. (2009). Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity. European Political Science Review, 1(2), 173–204.Google Scholar
  78. Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.Google Scholar
  79. Schreurs, M. A. (2010). Multi-level governance and global climate change in East Asia. Asian Economic Policy Review, 5(1), 88–105.Google Scholar
  80. Sending, O. J., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Governance to governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 651–672.Google Scholar
  81. Siddiquee, N. A., Nastiti, D., & Sejati, N. A. (2012). Regional autonomy and local resource mobilization in Eastern Indonesia: Problems and pitfalls of fiscal decentralization. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 39(1), 44–68.Google Scholar
  82. Sloat, A. (2002). An actor-centred approach to multi-level governance: Expectations of Scotland’s role in Europe. Regional & Federal Studies, 12(3), 156–180.Google Scholar
  83. Sonnenfeld, D. A., & Mol, A. P. J. (2006). Environmental reform in Asia: Comparisons, challenges, next steps. The Journal of Environment Development, 15, 112–137.Google Scholar
  84. Suharto, E. (2002). Human development and the urban informal sector in Bandung, Indonesia: The poverty issue. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 4(2), 115–133.Google Scholar
  85. Suskevics, M. (2012). Legitimacy analysis of multi-level governance of biodiversity: Evidence from 11 case studies across the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(4), 217–237.Google Scholar
  86. Tanner, T., Mitchell, T., Polack, E., & Guenther, B. (2009). Urban governance for adaptation: Assessing climate change resilience in ten Asian cities. IDS Working Papers, 2009(315), 01–47.Google Scholar
  87. Thynell, M., Mohan, D., & Tiwari, G. (2010). Sustainable transport and the modernisation of urban transport in Delhi and Stockholm. Cities, 27(6), 421–429.Google Scholar
  88. UNDP. (2011). Towards human resilience: Sustaining MDG progress in an age of economic uncertainty. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  89. UNFCCC. (2011). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php. Accessed 7 Aug 2011.
  90. UNFPA. (2011). Population dynamics in the least developed countries: Challenges and opportunities for development and poverty reduction. Retrieved from www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/.../2011/CP51265.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2011.
  91. UN-HABITAT. (2010). The state of Asian cities 2010/11. Fukuoka: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT).Google Scholar
  92. United Nations. (2012). The Millenium development goals report 2012. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  93. Urwin, K., & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18, 180–191.Google Scholar
  94. Wallis, J., & Dollery, B. (2002). Social capital and local government capacity. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 76–85.Google Scholar
  95. Watkins, S. C., Swidler, A., & Hannan, T. (2012). Outsourcing social transformation: Development NGOs as organizations. The Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 285–315.Google Scholar
  96. Weiler, J. H. H. (2012). In the face of crisis: Input legitimacy, output legitimacy, and the political messianism of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 34(7), 825–841.Google Scholar
  97. Widianingsih, I., & Morrell, E. (2007). Participatory planning in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 28(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  98. Willard, T. (2009). Social networking and governance for sustainable development. Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  99. Wilson, I. D. (2010). ‘The streets belong to who?’:‘Governance’ and the urban informal sector in Jakarta, Indonesia. Perth: Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University, Australia.Google Scholar
  100. World Bank. (2006). Making the new Indonesia work for the poor. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/Resources/Publication/280016-1152870963030/2753486-1165385030085/Overview_standalone_en.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2013.
  101. Wright, L., & Fulton, L. (2005). Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transport Reviews, 25(6), 691–717.Google Scholar
  102. Yedla, S., Shrestha, R. M., & Anandarajah, G. (2005). Environmentally sustainable urban transportation – Comparative analysis of local emission mitigation strategies vis-a-vis GHG mitigation strategies. Transport Policy, 12(3), 245–254.Google Scholar
  103. Zerah, M. H. (2009). Participatory governance in urban management and the shifting geometry of power in Mumbai. Development and Change, 40(5), 853–877.Google Scholar
  104. Zerbinati, S. (2012). Multi-level governance and EU structural funds: An entrepreneurial local government perspective. Local Government Studies, 38(5), 577–597.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suryani Eka Wijaya
    • 1
  • Muhammad Imran
    • 2
  1. 1.BAPPEDA of NTB ProvinceMataramIndonesia
  2. 2.Massey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations