Advertisement

Understanding the Learners

  • Chwee Beng Lee
  • José HanhamEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Learner analysis is the process of identifying who our learners are. In learner analysis, the instructional designer tries to identify the demographics of the intended learners, their prior knowledge and specific characteristics or attributes. It is arguably the most critical component of instructional design. It largely determines instructional design as it provides a profile of the intended learners so that the instruction can result in meaningful learning. This is especially true when high-stakes contexts involve a high level of risk, and unproductive learning and instruction may lead to adverse impacts on real-world decision making. In this chapter, we discuss the types of learner characteristics to analyse and the strategies to apply when conducting learner analysis in targeted contexts.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (6th ed., pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: IAP -Information Age Publication Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9–44.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2015). On deconstructing commentaries regarding alternative theories of self-regulation. Journal of Management, 41, 1025–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315572826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, A., & Green, T. (2016). The essential of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Butz, A. R., & Usher, E. L. (2015). Salient sources of early adolescents’ self-efficacy in two domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 49–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, G., Gully, S., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke, N., Kiekel, P., Salas, E., & Stout, R. (2003). Measuring team knowledge: A window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 179–199.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Press.Google Scholar
  11. Giovengo, R. (2016). Training law enforcement officers. Milton, Canada: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glatz, T., & Buchanan, C. M. (2015). Change and predictors of change in parental self-efficacy from early to middle adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1367–1379.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanham, J., & McCormick, J. (2009). Group work in schools with close friends and acquaintances: Linking self processes with group processes. Learning and Instruction, 19, 214–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanham, J., & McCormick, J. (2018). A multilevel study of self-beliefs and student behaviors in a group problem-solving task. Journal of Educational Research, 111, 201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1241736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedden, H. (2011). International law enforcement educators and trainers association. In D. Griffith (Ed.), Coping with budget cuts. Police Magazine.Google Scholar
  16. Herzberg, F. (1987). Workers’ needs: The same around the world. Industry Week, 29–32.Google Scholar
  17. Hudson, K. A. (2016). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy in military leaders. Dissertations. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.brandman.edu/edd_dissertations/35
  18. Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, C. B. (2013). Examining intentional knowing among secondary school students: Through the lens of metacognition. The Asia Pacific Educational Researcher, 22, 79–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0028-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, C. B., & Hanham, J. (2017). Evaluating the impact of online tutoring. Technical Report.  https://doi.org/10.4225/35/59474e9de4cf7.
  21. Lee, C. B., Koh, N. K., Cai, X. L., & Quek, C. L. (2012). Children’s use of metacognition in solving everyday problems: Children’s monetary decision making. Australian Journal of Education, 56, 23–40.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411205600103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCormick, J., & McPherson, G. E. (2003). The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychology of Music, 31, 37–51.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735603031001322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ng, K. H., Lee, C. B., & Teo, T. (2010). The role of self-questioning: An initial study on problem solving in a security organization. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 27, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
  27. Smaldino, S., Lowther, D., & Russell, J. (2012). Instructional technology and media for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Tengpongsthorn, W. (2017). Factors affecting the effectiveness of police performance in metropolitan police bureau. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valentine, M., Nembhard, I., & Edmondson, A. (2015). Measuring teamwork in health care settings: A review of survey instruments. Medical Care, 53, 16–30.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feef6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Developing and training human resources in the organization (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations