Advertisement

Mapping the Progress of Local Government Innovation in Contemporary China

  • Jianxing Yu
  • Biao Huang
Chapter

Abstract

As a key variable in explaining economic and social development in China, local government innovation has attracted considerable attention in the studies of Chinese government and politics. The previous research has mostly focused on two forms of local government innovation: “spontaneous exploration” and “top-down experimentation”. Since the 18th National Congress of CPC, spontaneous exploration has been restricted in terms of scope, range and possibility; however, there emerges a new form of innovation different from spontaneous exploration and top-down experimentation – “seeking approval”. This new form has been empirically demonstrated by Hunan, Shandong, Shanxi, Zhejiang provinces and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and is likely to become a new trend of local government innovation in China. As a hybrid model of spontaneous exploration and top-down experimentation, “seeking approval” brings the informal interaction between local and upper-level governments into formal government process, and it is a possible path for positive interaction of “top-level design” and “local exploration”. It may further distinguish the authoritative boundary of different levels of governments in practice and restructure a new vertical intergovernmental relationship. That is to say, the allocation of government power would be based on the distribution of responsibility, centralizing and (or) decentralizing power as the responsibilities go.

References

  1. Birney, M. 2014. Decentralization and veiled corruption under China’s “Rule of Mandates.” World Development 53: 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, J. 2004. Local governments innovations and governance changing: A comparative case study of two Chinese local governments. Journal of Public Management (in Chinese) (4): 22–28.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, X., and X. Yang. 2009. Promoting local government innovations: Local cadres’ view. Journal of Public Management (in Chinese) (3): 1–11.Google Scholar
  4. Cui, Z. 1994. Institutional innovation and the second thought liberation. Twenty-First Century (in Chinese) 24: 5–16.Google Scholar
  5. De Ven, V. 1988. Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. In: Michael L. Tushman, and William L. Moore (eds.). Readings in the Management of Innovation. MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  6. Deng, X. 1994. “The Reform of Party and State’s Leadership System.” In: Literature Editing Committee of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (eds.) The Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping (Volume II) (in Chinese), Beijing: People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
  7. Hartley, J. 2005. Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management 25(1): 27–34.Google Scholar
  8. He, Z. 2003. Rural governance transition and institutional innovation: Investigation and reflection on “Yi Zhi San Hua” experience of Wu’an City in Hebei Province. Comparative Economic & Social Systems (in Chinese) (6): 74–82.Google Scholar
  9. Heilmann, S. 2008a. From local experiments to national policy: The origins of China’s distinctive policy process. The China Journal 59: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heilmann, S. 2008b, Policy experimentation in China’s economic rise. Studies in Comparative International Development 43(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, I. 2017. How the Communist Party Guided China to Success. The New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/world/asia/china-politics-xi-jinping.html.
  12. Lin, J.Y., F. Cai, and Z. Li. 1994. The China Miracle: Development Strategy and Economic Reform (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Press.Google Scholar
  13. Liu, W. 2015. Policy experiments: Start-up mechanisms and internal logic—Case studies on the performance management policies in China’s public sectors. Chinese Public Administration (in Chinese) (5): 113–119.Google Scholar
  14. Mei, C., X. Wang, L. Liao, et al. 2015. Patterns of “experimentation point”: Evidence from People’s Daily’s 1992–2003 Reports on policy experimentation point. Journal of Public Administration (in Chinese) (3): 8–24.Google Scholar
  15. Osborne, S.P., and L. Brown. 2011. Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK: The word that would be king? Public Administration 89(4): 1335–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Qian, Y., and C. Xu. 1993. Why China’s economic reforms differ: The M-form hierarchy and entry/expansion of the nonstate sector. Comparative Economic & Social Systems (in Chinese) (1): 29–40.Google Scholar
  18. Shambaugh, D. 2016. China’s Future. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Shin, S. 2013. China’s failure of policy innovation: The case of sulphur dioxide emission trading. Environmental Politics 22(6): 918–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker, J.L. 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review 63(3): 880–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, Q., and G. Guo. 2015. Yu Keping and Chinese intellectual discourse on good governance. The China Quarterly 224: 985–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu, J., L. Ma, T. Su, et al. 2011. Typology and characteristics of government innovations: A multi-case study of winning programs of the “Innovations and Excellence in Chinese Local Governance.” Journal of Public Management (in Chinese) (1): 94–103.Google Scholar
  23. Wu, J., L. Ma, and Y. Yang. 2007. The local governments’ impetus for innovations, their characteristics and the related performance: An analysis of the test of cases adopted from “The Awards for Innovation to China’s Local Governments.” Management World (in Chinese) (8): 43–51.Google Scholar
  24. Wu, J., L. Ma, and Y. Yang. 2013. Innovation in the Chinese public sector: Typology and distribution. Public Administration 91(2): 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang X. 2011. China local government reform in the past decade: An evaluation based on Chinese local governance innovations awards. Journal of Public Administration (in Chinese) (1): 81–93.Google Scholar
  26. Yang, X. 2015. Why local governments are lack of innovation impetus. Decision-making (in Chinese) (11): 12.Google Scholar
  27. Yang X., and X. Chen. 2010. Social conditions and developing status of Chinese government innovations: The vision of local cadres. Journal of Social Sciences (in Chinese) (2): 12–23.Google Scholar
  28. Yu, J., and B. Huang. 2015. The applicability of the diffusion of local government innovation. Comparative Economic & Social Systems (in Chinese) (1): 171–181.Google Scholar
  29. Yu, J., E. Cai, and X. Gao. 2016. Functions and limits of selection and appointment mechanism of cadres among vertical intergovernmental relationship—Based on questionnaire of party and government leaders of cities and counties in Zhejiang Province. Journal of Zhejiang Party School of C. P. C. (in Chinese) (1): 12–21.Google Scholar
  30. Yu, J., and S. Guan. 2013. The function of social governance in local governments: Measurement and institutionalization. Academic Monthly (in Chinese) (6): 17–26.Google Scholar
  31. Yu, J., and S. Qin. 2015. Institutionalization: Connotation, mold, formation mechanism and evaluation. Academic Monthly (in Chinese) (3): 109–117.Google Scholar
  32. Yu, K. 2003. Reforms and innovations in Chinese local governments, Comparative Economic & Social Systems (in Chinese) (4): 31–34.Google Scholar
  33. Yu, K. 2012. Government innovations in China and the United States—A comparative survey based on Chinese and American government innovation awards programs. Academic Monthly (in Chinese) (3): 5–15.Google Scholar
  34. Yu, K. 2015a. Lack of innovation impetus among grassroots governments. Honesty Outlook (in Chinese) (5): 12.Google Scholar
  35. Yu, K. 2015b. Insufficient Innovation Impetus among Grassroots Governments. http://www.chinareform.org.cn/people/Y/yukeping/Article/201504/t20150417_223255.htm.
  36. Zeng, J. 2015. Did policy experimentation in China always seek efficiency? A case study of Wenzhou financial reform in 2012. Journal of Contemporary China 24(92): 338–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, W. 2015. Scholar Suggests Central Government’s Sustainable Encourage of Local Innovation and Permit Local Government’s Making Mistakes. The Paper (in Chinese): Dec 12th. Available at http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1408150.
  38. Zheng, Y. 2014. The Political Risk if China Does not Reform. Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese): July 1st. Available at http://www.zaobao.com/forum/views/opinion/story20140701-360971.
  39. Zheng, Y. 2015. How to Advance Reform under New Normal. Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese): May 12th. Available at http://www.zaobao.com/forum/expert/zheng-yong-nian/story20150512-479161.
  40. Zhou, H. 2003. Let rural Democracy work—Evidence from “two-vote system” Guangshui City, Hubei Province. Marxism & Reality (in Chinese) (4): 94–103.Google Scholar
  41. Zhou, Q. 1994. Reform in China’s countryside: Changes to the relationship between the state and ownership. Chinese Social Sciences Quarterly (in Chinese) 8: 61–84.Google Scholar
  42. Zhu, Y., and D. Xiao. 2015. Policy entrepreneur and social policy innovation. The Journal of Chinese Sociology 2(1): 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianxing Yu
    • 1
  • Biao Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public AffairsZhejiang UniversityHangzhou, ZhejiangChina

Personalised recommendations