Advertisement

Breathe Easy? Local Nuances of Authoritarian Environmentalism in China’s Battle Against Air Pollution

  • Anna L. Ahlers
  • Yongdong ShenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The heavy smog suffocating China’s cities is increasingly being perceived as a threat by both the population and the authorities. Consequently, political action aiming at regulating ambient air pollution has become increasingly comprehensive and rigid in recent year. Even measures limiting consumption and production seem to become acceptable as China is facing an airpocalypse. Does this suggest a genesis of real “authoritarian environmentalism” (AE) in the PRC? Taking this as a heuristic point of departure, we present findings from research on the local implementation of air pollution control measures in Hangzhou City. We offer a critical examination of the concept of AE and, in particular, of policy implementation strategies vis-à-vis the general public. Altogether, we argue for different emphases in a potential Chinese model of AE. In a context where outcomes are sought at any cost, we observe more complexity and nuances than are usually captured by the AE concept.

References

  1. Ahlers, Anna L., and Mette Halskov Hansen (forthcoming). “Air Pollution: How Will China Win its Self-Declared War Against it?” In Eva Sternfeld (ed.), Routledge Handbook on Chinese Environmental Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Beeson, Mark. 2015. “Authoritarian Environmentalism and China.” In Teena Gabrielson, Cheryl Hall, John M. Meyer and David Schlosberg (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 520–532.Google Scholar
  3. Beeson, Mark. 2010. “The Coming of Environmental Authoritarianism.” Environmental Politics 19(2), 276–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Xiaojie and Jinhua Zhao. 2013. “Bidding to Drive: Car License Auction Policy in Shanghai and Its Public Acceptance.” Transport Policy 27, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delman, Jørgen. 2014. “Climate Change Politics and Hangzhou’s ‘Green City Making’.” In Per Olof Berg and Björner Emma (eds.), Branding Chinese mega-cities: policies, practices and positioning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 249–261.Google Scholar
  6. Delman, Jørgen. 2015. “Performance Assessment, Social accountability and Sustainability Governance in Hangzhou: Leveraging the Implementation gap?” Paper to be presented at the workshop on Governance for urban sustainability in China: Challenges and Practices, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 31 October–01 November 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Feng, Suwei and Li, Qiang. 2013. “Car Ownership Control in Chinese Mega Cities: Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou.” Journeys, 40–49.Google Scholar
  8. Gilley, Bruce. 2012. “Authoritarian Environmentalism and China’s Response to Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 21(2), 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hangzhou City Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB). 2007. “Hangzhoushi Banshan diqu huanjing wuran zonghe zhengzhi gongzuo fangan” (Scheme for the comprehensive regulation of environmental pollution in Banshan District).Google Scholar
  10. Hangzhou City Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB). 2009. “Hangzhou shi Beidaqiao diqu huanjing wuran zonghe zhengzhi gongzuo fang’an” (Scheme for the comprehensive regulation of environmental pollution in Beidaqiao District).Google Scholar
  11. Hangzhou City Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB). 2011. “Kuayue: Hangzhou shi huanjing wuran yonghe yhengzhi lichen” (Leap over: The progress of Hangzhou City’s comprehensive regulation of environmental pollution in (2007–2011)).Google Scholar
  12. Hangzhou City Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB). 2013. “Changqun duihua: huanbao zhili de chuangxin pingtai” (Dialogue between polluting enterprises and local residents: an innovative platform for environmental governance). Hangzhou 254(3), 43–44.Google Scholar
  13. Hangzhou City Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB). 2014. “2014 nian Hangzhou shi huanjing zhuankuang gongbao” (Environment Bulletin of Hangzhou City for the year 2014).Google Scholar
  14. Hangzhou City Government. 2014a. “Guanyu yinfa Hangzhou shi daqi wuran fangzhi xingdong jihua (2014–2017 nian) de tongzhi” (Circular on the implementation of Hangzhou City’s action plan for air pollution control and prevention [2014–2017]). 15 May. Document No. 80.Google Scholar
  15. Hangzhou City Government. 2014b. “Hangzhoushi xiaokeche zongliang tiaokong zanxing guanli guiding” (Temporary regulations for control of the number of private cars in Hangzhou). 29 April. Document No. 7.Google Scholar
  16. He, Baogang and Stig Thøgersen. 2010. “Giving the People a Voice? Experiments with Consultative Authoritarian Institutions in China.” Journal of Contemporary China 19(66), 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kostka, Genia. 2016. “Command Without Control: The Case of China’s Environmental Target System.” Regulation & Governance 10(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kostka, Genia and Sarah Eaton. 2014. “Authoritarian Environmentalism Undermined? Local Leaders’ Time Horizons and Environmental Policy Implementation in China.” The China Quarterly 218, 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Wenfang Tang, and Nicholas F. Martini. 2014. “A Chinese Popularity Function Sources of Government Support.” Political Research Quarterly 67(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ran, Ran. 2015. Zhongguo difang huanjing zhengzhi: zhengce yu zhixing zhe jian de jilü (China’s local environmental politics: discrepancies between policies and their implementation). Beijing: Zhongyang bianyi chubanshe.Google Scholar
  21. Shearman, David and Joseph Wayne Smith. 2007. The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Standing Committee of the People’s Congress of Zhejiang Province. 2013. “Zhejiangsheng jidongche paiqi wuran fangzhi tiaoli” (Regulation for the Control of Motor Vehicle Exhaust Pollution in Zhejiang Province). 22 November. Document No. 8.Google Scholar
  23. Sterner, Thomas and Coria, Jessica. 2012. Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge/RFF Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Teets, Jessica C. 2013. “Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China.” The China Quarterly 213, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Truex, Rory. 2014. “Consultative Authoritarianism and its Limits.” Comparative Political Studies,  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014534196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, Shaoguang. 2008. “Changing Models of China’s Policy Agenda Setting.” Modern China 34(1), 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhejiang Provincial Government. 2006. “Zhejiang sheng huanjing wuran jiandu guanli banfa” (Zhejiang Provinces’ supervision management measures for environmental pollution). 13 July. Document No. 321.Google Scholar
  28. Zhejiang Provincial Government. 2010. “Zhejiangsheng xingzheng guifanxing wenjian guanli banfa” (Rules for the management of administrative regulatory documents in Zhejiang Province). 20 July. Document No. 275.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.School of Public AffairsZhejiang UniversityHangzhou, ZhejiangChina

Personalised recommendations