Citizen Action and Policy Change

  • Yanling He


Chinese citizens are becoming more conscious of their citizenship rights. As more and more Chinese citizens are involved in different stages of the decision-making process, this is changing how decisions are made. Citizen participation has led to more “scientific” policy decisions and better implementation.


  1. Arnstein, S. 1969. A ladder of public participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4), July, 216–224.Google Scholar
  2. Bian, Yanjie. 2010. Relational sociology and other cognate discipline (Guanxi Shehuixue Ji Qi Xueke Diwei).Google Scholar
  3. Brantly Womack. March 1982. The 1980 County-Level Elections in China: Experiment in Democratic Modernization. Asian Survey 22(3): 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bray, D. 2006. Building ‘community’: New strategies of governance in urban China. Economy and Society 35(4): 530–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai, Y. 2002. Relaxing the constraints from above: Politics of privatizing public enterprises in China. Asian Journal of Political Science (10): 94–121.Google Scholar
  6. Cai, Y. 2006. State and Laid Off Workers in reform China. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai, Y. 2008. Power structures and regime resilience: contentious politics in China. British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 411–432.Google Scholar
  8. Cai, H., Chaohai Li, and Jianhua Feng. 2009. The collective action of migrant workers—based on the research on enterprises in Pearl River Delta (Liyi Shousun Nongmingong Liyi Kangzheng Xingwei Yanjiu—Jiyu Zhusanjiao Qiye de Diaocha). Journal of Sociology Study (1).Google Scholar
  9. Cao, J., and Z. Chen. 1997. Stepping Outside the Ideal Castle: Research on the Unit in China (Zou Chu Li Xiang Cheng Bao: Zhong Guo Dan Wei Xian Xiang Yan Jiu). Shenzhen: Haitian Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, Feng. 2003. Between the state and labour: The conflict of Chinese trade unions’ double identity in market reform. The China Quarterly 176.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, Yinfang. 2006. Action power and institutional limitation—the middle level in urban movement (Xingdongli Yu Zhidu Xianzhi—Dushi Yundong de Zhongchan Jieji). Journal of Sociology Study (4).Google Scholar
  12. Cho, Y.N. 2008. Local People’s Congresses in China: Development and Transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. 1997. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 67–91.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlberg, L. 2004. Net-public sphere research: Beyond the first phase. The Public 11(1): 27–77, 2004, 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, T., and R. Chandler. 2011. Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence. In: Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Derleth, J., and Koldyk, D.R. 2002. The district people’s congresses and political reform in China. Problems of Post Communism 49(2). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Enserink, B., and J. Koppenjan. 2007. Public participation in China: sustainable urbanization and governance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 18(4): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enserink, B., M. Patel, N. Kranz, and J. Maestu. 2007. Cultural factors as co-determinants of participation in river basin management. Ecology and Society 12(2): 24. [online] URL:
  19. Feng, S. 2006. Danwei segregation and collective contention (Dan Wei Fen Ge Yu Ji Ti Kang Zheng). Journal of Sociology Study (3): 98–134.Google Scholar
  20. Fishkin, J., Baogang He, Robert C. Luskin, and Alice Siu. 2010. Deliberative democracy in an unlikely place: Deliberative polling in China. British Journal of Political Science 40(2): 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habermas, J. 2006. Towards a United States of Europe. Translated excerpt from Bruno Kreisky Prize Lecture. March 9. Available at:
  22. Hanna F. Pitkin. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 221–223.Google Scholar
  23. He, B. 2004. Participatory and Deliberative Institutions in China. In: Collection of the Essays Presented at the International Conference on Deliberative Democracy and Chinese Practice of Participatory and Deliberative Institutions. Zhongguo she hui ke xue chu ban she. Beijing, China, pp. 92–108.Google Scholar
  24. He, Y. 2004. The involution of Chinese urban grassroots autonomic organizations and its formation (Zhongguo Chengshi Jiceng Zizhi Zuzhi de Neijuanhua jiqi Chengyin). Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (2).Google Scholar
  25. He, B. 2007. Rural Democracy in China. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 96–97.Google Scholar
  26. He, B. 2014. From village election to village deliberation in rural China: Case study of a deliberative democracy experiment. Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 19: 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. He, Y. 2016. Revolution without change: The limitation of Chinese local administrative reform (Wu Biange De Biange: Zhongguo Difang Xingzheng Gaige De Xiandu). Journal of Xuehai (1): 34–43.Google Scholar
  28. He, B., and S. Thøgersen. 2010. Giving the people a voice? Experiments with consultative authoritarian institutions in China. Journal of Contemporary China 19(66): 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu, W. 2005. The reform and reflection on the urban grassroots autonomy institution since late 1990s (20 Shiji 90 Niandai Houqi Yilai Chengshi Jiceng Zizhi Zhidu de Biange yu Fansi). Journal of Wuhan University (3).Google Scholar
  30. Jia, X. 2007. An analysis of NGO Avenues for civil participation in China. Social Sciences in China. Special issues NGOs and social transition in China.Google Scholar
  31. Li, L. 2010. Rights consciousness and rules consciousness in contemporary China. The China Journal 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, P. 2013. The reform and future of social organization system (Woguo Shehui Zuzhi Tizhi de Gaige he Weilai). Journal of Sociology (2).Google Scholar
  33. Li, L., and K.J. O’Brien. 1996. Villagers and popular resistance in contemporary China. Modern China 22(1).Google Scholar
  34. Li, L. and K.J. O’Brien. 1999. The Struggle over Village Elections: The Paradox of China’s Post-Mao Reforms. Harvard University Press, pp. 129–144, 382–389.Google Scholar
  35. Lin, S., and Y. Ma. 2000. Community Organization and Residents Committee Construction (She Qu Zu Zhi Yu Ju Wei Hui Jian She). Shanghai: Shanghai University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Liu, J. 2000. Unit China: Individual, Organization and Government During Social Reconstruction (Dan Wei Zhong Guo: She Hui Tiao Kong Ti Xi Chong Gou Zhong De Ge Ren, Zu Zhi He Guo Jia). Taijin: Renmin Press.Google Scholar
  37. O’Brien, K.J., and L. Li. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. O’Brien, K. 1996. Rightful resistance. World Politics 49: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Brien, K., and L. Li. 1999. Selective policy implementation in rural China. Comparative Politics 31: 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pan, Y., H. Lu, and H. Zhang. 2010. The formalization of social class: The labor control and collective contention. Open Times (5).Google Scholar
  41. Plummer, J., and J.G. Taylor. 2004. The characteristics of community participation in China. In: J. Plummer and J.G. Taylor (eds), Community Participation in China, Issues and Processes for Capacity Building. London/Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  42. Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  43. Shi, F. 2005. Relation network, rightful contention and contemporary urban collective action in China (Guanxi Wangluo, Yi Fa Kangzheng He Zhongguo Chengshi Jiti Xingdong). Journal of Xuehai (3):1–27.Google Scholar
  44. Sun Liping. 1996. Relation, social network and social structure (Guanxi, Shehui Guanxi yu Shehui Jiegou). Journal of sociology study (5):20–30.Google Scholar
  45. Tang, W., and X. Ma. 2011. Non-political autonomy: Non-governmental organization’s living strategy. Zhejiang Social Sciences (10).Google Scholar
  46. UNESCAP. 2005. What is good governance? United Nations economic and social omission for Asia and the Pacific. Available at:
  47. Verba, S., N. Nie, and K. Jae-on. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven Nation Comparison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 51–52.Google Scholar
  48. Walder. 1983. Organized dependency and cultures of authority in Chinese industry. Journal of Asian studies 18(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang, J. 2011. Internet mobilization and collective contention of OEM workers (Hulianwang Yu Daigongchang Gongren Jiti Kangzheng). Open Times (11): 114–128.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank Group. 2005. “Poverty reduction, strategy formulation organizing participatory processes in the PRSP. What is participation and what role can it play in the PRSP?” Available at: (accessed Jan 2012).
  51. Xia, M. 2007. The People’s Congresses and Governance in China: Toward a Network Mode of Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Xu, Q., and J. Chow. 2006. Urban community in China: Service, participation, and development. International Journal of Social Welfare 15(3): 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ying, X. 2001. Dahe Yimin Shangfang de Gushi (A Story of Migrants’ Appeals in Dahe). Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.Google Scholar
  54. Young, I.M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Yu, J. 2004. An explanation on peasants’ collective action. Journal of Sociology (2).Google Scholar
  56. Zhang, L. 2005. Homeowners’ collective action: The motivation and mobilisation. Journal of Sociology Study (6):1–39.Google Scholar
  57. Zhou, X. 1993. Unorganized interests and collective action in Communist China. American Sociological Review 58(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou, W. 2012. In search of deliberative democracy in China. Journal of Public Deliberation 8(1).Google Scholar
  59. Zhou, Y., and X. Yang. 1999. Unit Institution in China (Zhong Guo Dan Wei Zhi Du). Beijing: Chinese Economy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanling He
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Chair Professor of the Pearl River Program (珠江学者特聘教授)GuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Public Administration, Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Research Institute for Urban Governance of Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Committee for Government Strategy and Public Policy of the Chinese Research Council of Modern ManagementGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations