Advertisement

Production of Ethanol from Municipal Solid Waste of India and Nepal

  • B. ThapaEmail author
  • S. K. Patidar
  • N. R. Khatiwada
  • A. K. KC
  • A. Ghimire
Conference paper

Abstract

The increasing generation of municipal solid waste and energy crisis is posing various problems in developing countries. The major portion of municipal solid waste generated in developing countries mainly consists of organic waste. Apart from currently used disposal techniques like composting, anaerobic digestion, RDF, landfilling, etc., ethanol production from organic fraction of MSW could be a promising source of energy generation and waste management. Very limited researches have been conducted on utilizing municipal solid waste to ethanol production in case of Nepal and India. The feasibility of ethanol production was studied at lab scale using food waste generated at Greater Noida, India. Food wastes were collected, dried, and crushed to produce ethanol in this study. Principally, two experiments were carried out in series (i.e., hydrolysis and fermentation). Varying acid concentration and temperature were considered for optimization in hydrolysis. The maximum reducing sugar yield obtained was 32.63 g/100 g of dry food waste at 7.5% acid concentration at 135 °C. The ethanol yield was 13.78 g/100 g of dry food waste. Both Monod equation and Luedeking–Piret model were fitting the fermentation results obtained in the study. For Monod equation, the value of Ks and µmax were found to be 26.19 g/l and 0.08 h−1, respectively. The product formation of fermentation was found to be growth associated as per Luedeking–Piret model. As per the theoretical calculations, 13,414 L/d and 329,756 L/d of ethanol can be produced from MSW of Kathmandu Valley and Delhi, respectively. It can be concluded that ethanol can be produced efficiently by controlled fermentation techniques from municipal wastes using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Production of ethanol from a free resource like organic portion of municipal solid waste is doubtlessly an attractive disposal option from environmental point of view. However, detailed cost–benefit analysis of ethanol production option with other disposal options is necessary to assess economic viability and its application at larger scale.

Keywords

Food waste Kinetics Cell growth Ethanol formation Saccharomyces cerevisiae 

References

  1. 1.
    ADB (2013) A report on Solid waste mangement in Nepal: current status and policy recommedation. Asian Developnment Bank, Mandaluyog, PhilippiesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad F, Tariq AJ, Kamarudin MH, Mel M (2011) Study of growth kinetic and modeling of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Afr J Biotech 16(81):18842–18846Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akponah E, Akpomie O (2011) Analysis of the suitability of yam, potato and cassava root peels for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int Res J Microbiol 2(10):393–398Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Annepu RK (2012) Sustainable solid waste management in India. Master of Science in Earth Resources Engineering Thesis, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ehrman T (1998) Standard method for ash in biomass. In: Chemical analysis and testing laboratory analytical procedures. Department of Energy, Midwest Research Institute (MRI)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehrman T (1998) Standard test method for moisture, total solids, and total dissolved solids in biomass slurry and liquid process samples. In: Chemical analysis and testing laboratory analytical procedures. Department of Energy, Midwest Research Institute (MRI)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engineering Study and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd (2017) Solid waste management baseline study of 60 new municipalities. Solid Waste Management and Technical Support Centre, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Englishnews.cn (2012) http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/indepth/2012-03/28/c_131494402.htm. Accessed on 5 April 2012
  9. 9.
    Hu R, Lin L, Liu T, Liu S (2010) Dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of sugar maple wood extract at atmospheric pressure. Bioresour Technol 101(10), pp 3586–3594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kathmandu Metropolitan City (2009) Project report on Cities Development Initiatives for Asia (CDIA)—Kathmandu Metropolitan City, sponsored by ADB projectGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JH, Lee JC, Pak D (2011) Feasibility of producing ethanaol from food waste. Waste Manage 31:2121–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lenihan P, Walker GM, Orozco A, O’Neill E, Ahmad MNM, Rooney DW (2010) Dilute acid hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Chem Eng J 156:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manikandan K, Virthagiri T (2010) Kinetic and Optimization studies on ehtnaol production from Corn Flour. Int J Chem Biol Eng 3(2): 65–69Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    NREL (1988) Chemical Analysis and testing laboratory analytical procedures. Department of Energy, Midwest Research Institute (MRI)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romero I, Moya M, Sánchez S, Ruiz E, Castro E, Bravo V (2007) Ethanolic fermentation of phosphoric acid hydrolysates from olive tree pruning. Ind Crops Prod 25(2):160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruofei H, Lu L, Liu T, Liu S (2010) Dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of sugar maple wood extract at atmospheric pressure. Bioresour Technol 101:3586–3594Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saravanan P, Pakshirajan K, Saha P (2008) Growth kinetics of an indigenous mixed microbial consortium during phenol degradation in a batch reactor, Bioresource. Technology 99(1): 205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharholy M, Ahmed K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC (2008) Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities—a review. Waste Manage 28(2):459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shi J, Ebrik M, Yang B, Wyman CE (2009) The potential of cellulosic ethanol production from municipal solid waste: a technical and economic evaluation. University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shi J, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Chinn M, Howell N (2009) Effect of microbial pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of cotton stalks for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 33(1):88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mole. Sci 9:1621–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Talebnia F (2008) Ethanol Production from cellulosic biomass by encapsulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thapa B, Sapkota L, Khanal P (2009) Waste management and leachate treatment at landfill sites of Nepal. B. Tech. in Environmental Engineering Thesis, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kathmandu University, NepalGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    University of Canterbury (2012) http://www.outreach.canterbury.ac.nz/chemistry/documents/ethanol.pdf. Accessed on 4 Mar 2012

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Thapa
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • S. K. Patidar
    • 2
  • N. R. Khatiwada
    • 1
  • A. K. KC
    • 4
  • A. Ghimire
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringKathmandu UniversityDhulikhelNepal
  2. 2.National Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia
  3. 3.Soil Water and Air Testing Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.KathmanduNepal
  4. 4.OxfamKathmanduNepal

Personalised recommendations