Advertisement

A Qualitative–Quantitative Methodological Approach for Sustainable Reclamation of Open Dumps: The Case of the Controlled Dump of Tripoli

  • Mervat El-HozEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) is a major problem facing the Urban Commune Al-Fayhaa (UCF) in Lebanon for more than 40 years. The population growth, the presence of Syrian refugees due to the political conflict, and scarce availability of land have led to a crisis in UCF existing controlled dump (CD) which covers an area of 60,000 m2, serving approximately 500,000 persons with an average 425 tons/day of waste. The site approached its final grades since 2012 and is still used. The aim of this study is to find an effective solution to the problem of the current crisis in this CD. The methodology follows a five-step procedure: identification and review of relevant literature; data collection; meeting with the concerned stakeholders; fieldwork; data processing; and solution to this problem. Four scenarios are studied (leave controlled dump as it is; closure and cover of CD; enhanced landfill mining and reclamation (mobile plant); and enhanced landfill mining and reclamation (stationary plant)). The results show that enhanced landfill mining and reclamation with mobile sorting plant on-site is the best applicable solution, and an immediate decision should be considered to prevent additional public health problems and degradation of the environment.

Keywords

Municipal solid waste management Controlled dump Enhanced landfill mining Remediation Resource recovery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author expresses her appreciation to the Urban Commune of Al-Fayhaa for its cooperation in this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Salem SM, Lettieri P, Baeyens J (2009) Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): a review. Waste Manag 29(10):2625–2643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bosmans A, Vanderreydt I, Geysen D, Helsen L (2013) The crucial role of waste-to-energy technologies in enhanced landfill mining: a technology review. Clean Prod 55(1):10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deutz P, Neighbour G, McGuire M (2010) Integrating sustainable waste management into product design: sustainability as a functional requirement. Sustain Dev 18:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Maria F, Micale C, Sordi A, Cirulli G, Marionni M (2013) Urban Mining: quality and quantity of recyclable and recoverable material mechanically and physically extractable from residual waste. Waste Manag 33:2594–2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Hoz M (2005) Sanitary landfill extension. In: The tenth international waste management and landfill symposium, Sardinia, Italy, 3–7 Oct 2005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Hoz M (2012) Evaluation of composting processing technologies for the treatment of urban municipal solid waste. In: The twenty-seventh international conference, on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, PA U.S.A., March 11–14, pp 1394–1405Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Hoz M (2015) Market-based system of municipal solid waste composting. Solid Waste Technol Manag 41(3):239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El-Hoz M (2017) Enhancing governance, transparency and accountability for sustainable solid waste management. In: The thirty-second international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A., March 19–22, pp 40–58Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ford S, Warren K, Lorton C, Smithers R, Read A, Hudgins M (2013) Feasibility and viability of landfill mining and reclamation in Scotland (scoping study), final report, zero waste Scotland. http://ee.ricardo.com/cms/assets/Documents-for-Insight-pages/Resource-efficiency/Feasability-and-Viability-of-LFMR-Scotland-1904130.pdf
  10. 10.
    Frändegård P, Krook J, Svensson N, Eklund M (2013) A novel approach for environmental evaluation of landfill mining. Clean Prod 55:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hogland W (2002) Remediation of an old landfill site. Environ Sci Pollut Res 9(1):49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hogland W, Marques M, Nimmermark S (2004) Landfill mining and waste characterization: a strategy for remediation of contaminated areas. Mater Cycles Waste Manag 6:119–124Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jain P, Townsend T, Johnson P (2012) Case study of landfill reclamation at a Florida landfill site. Waste Manag 33(1):109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johansson N, Krook J, Eklund M (2012) Transforming dumps into gold mines: experiences from Swedish case studies. Environ Innov Soc Transit 5:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johansson N, Krook J, Eklund M, Berglund B (2013) An integrated review of concepts and initiatives for mining the technosphere: towards a new taxonomy. Clean Prod 55(1):35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones PT, Geysen D, Tielemans Y, Van Passel S, Pontikes Y, Blanpain B (2013) Enhanced landfill mining in view of multiple resource recovery: a critical review. Clean Prod 55:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaartinen T, Sormunen K, Rintala J (2013) Case study on sampling, processing and characterization of landfilled municipal solid waste in the view of landfill mining. Clean Prod 55(15):56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krook J (2010) Urban and landfill mining: emerging global perspectives and approaches. Clean Prod 18:1772–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krook J, Svensson N, Eklund M (2012) Landfill mining: a critical review of two decades of research. Waste Manag 32(3):513–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krook J, Baas L (2013) Getting serious about mining the technosphere: a review of recent landfill mining and urban mining research. Clean Prod 55(15):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kurian J, Esakku S, Palanivelu K, Selvam A (2003) Studies on landfill mining at solid waste dumpsites in India. In: Proceedings Sardinia’03, ninth international Landfill symposium, Cagliari, Italy, pp 248–255Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurian J, Esakku S, Nagendran R (2007) Mining compost from dumpsites and bioreactor landfills. Environ Technol Manag 7:317–325Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marella G, Raga R (2014) Use of the contingent valuation method in the assessment of a landfill mining project. Waste Manag 34(7):1199–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Observatory of Environment and Development (2017) Urban Commune Al-Fayhaa, Progress ReportGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prechthai T, Padmasri M, Visvanathan C (2008) Quality assessment of mined MSW from an open dumpsite for recycling potential. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quaghebeur M, Laenen B, Geysen D, Nielsen P, Pontikes Y, Van Gerven T, Spooren J (2013) Characterization of landfilled materials: screening of the enhanced landfill mining potential. Clean Prod 55:72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Raga R, Cossu R (2013) Bioreactor tests preliminary to landfill in situ aeration: a case study. Waste Manag 33(4):871–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    SWEEPNET (2010) Country Report on the Solid Waste Management in LebanonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van der Zee DJ, Achterkamp MC, de Visser BK (2004) Assessing the market opportunities of landfill mining. Waste Manag 24:795–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Passel S, Dubois M, Eyckmans J (2013) The economics of enhanced landfill mining: private and societal performance drivers. Clean Prod 55:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wagner TP, Raymond T (2015) Landfill mining: case study of a successful metals recovery project. Waste Manag 45:448–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Bank, SWEEPNET (2014) Cost of environmental degradation due to solid waste management practices in Beirut and Mount Lebanon, Final DraftGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhao Y, Song L, Huang R, Li X (2007) Recycling of aged refuse from a closed landfill. Waste Manage Res 25(2):130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou Chuanbin, Fang Wenjun, Wanying Xu, Cao Aixin, Wang Rusong (2014) Characteristics and the recovery potential of plastic wastes obtained from landfill mining. Clean Prod 80:80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhou C, Gong Z, Hu J, Cao A, Liang H (2015) A cost-benefit analysis of landfill mining and material recycling in China. Waste Manag 35:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BalamandEl-KouraLebanon

Personalised recommendations