Advertisement

Numerical Modelling of Spiral Cyclone Flow Field and the Impact Analysis of a Vortex Finder

  • R. VigneshEmail author
  • D. Balaji
  • M. Surya
  • A. Vishnu Pragash
  • R. Vishnu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In most industries to remove gas–solid particle separation, cyclone separators are used. Though it plays a major role, the efficiency of the cyclone is not up to mark. In order to fulfil that with the help of CFD platform to investigate the flow field in Stairmand cyclone. For a numerical analysis 3D, grid independent Stairmand cyclone is performed by a Eulerian–Lagrangian model with Reynolds stress model (RSM) is chosen as a turbulence closure model and also grid convergence index study has been carried out. The numerical analysis is carried out with the coupled flow pressure field and two-way coupled particle tracking (stochastic tracking model) which were verified with experimental data. In Stairmand cyclone, the performance is affected by the collision between the circulating gas stream and the gas stream of fresh inlet charge at the junction of inlet duct results in flow short-circuiting (pressure drop). To avoid short-circuiting, spiral inlet is designed for cyclone separator and also study has been extended out numerically for the spiral cyclone separator (SCS) with different vortex finder diameter, length, eccentric position, convergent and divergent type vortex finder.

Keywords

GCI Short-circuiting Spiral inlet Vortex finder RSM 

References

  1. 1.
    Griffiths, W.D., Boysan, F.: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and empirical modeling of the performance of a number of cyclone samplers. J. Aerosol Sci. 27(2), 281–304 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yuu, S., Yasukouchi, N. Hirosawa: Particle turbulent diffusion in a dust laden round. AIChE J. 24, 509–519 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sommerfeld, M., Kohnen, G., Ruger, M.: Some open questions and inconsistencies of Lagrangian particle dispersion models. In: Proceedings of Ninth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Kyoto, Japan, Paper 5.1 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Litchford, R.J., Jeng, S.M.: Efficient statistical transport model for turbulent particle dispersion in sprays. AIAA J. 29, 1443–1451 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, X.Q., Pereria, J.C.F.: Efficient computation of particle dispersion in turbulent flows with a stochastic-probabilistic model. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 40(8), 1727–1741 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, B., Xu, D.L., Chu, K.W., Yu, A.B.: Numerical study of gas-solid flow in a cyclone separator. Appl. Math. Model. 30, 1326–1342 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiang, R.B., Lee, K.W.: Numerical simulation of flow patterns in cyclones of different cone dimensions. Part. Syst. Charact. 22(3), 212–218 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qian, F., Zhang, M.: Effects of the inlet section angle on the flow field of a cyclone. Chem. Eng. Technol. 30(11), 15 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elsayed, K., Lacor, C.: The effect of cyclone inlet dimensions on the flow pattern and performance. Appl. Math. Model. 35, 1952–1968 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fluent: FLUENT 6.3 user’s guide. Fluent Incorporated, Lebanon (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gheshlaghi, M.E., Goharrizi, A.S., Shahrivar, A.A.: Simulation of a semi-industrial pilot plant thickener using CFD approach. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 23(1), 63–68 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Felice, R.: The voidage function for fluid-particle interaction systems. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 20, 153–159 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roache, P.J.: Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J. Fluids Eng. 116(3), 405–413 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    NASA: NPARC Alliance verification and Validation, Examining Spatial (Grid) Convergence. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/tutorial/spatconv.html
  15. 15.
    Roy, C.J, McWherter-Payne, M.A., Oberkampf, W.L.: Verification and validation for laminar hypersonic flowfields. AIAA Paper, pp. 200–2550 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roy, C.J.: Grid convergence error analysis for mixed-order numerical schemes. AIAA Paper, pp. 2001–2606 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boyson, F., Ewan, B.C.R., Swithenbank, J., Ayers, W.H.: Experimental and theoretical studies of cyclone separator aerodynamics. IChemE Symp. Ser. 69, 305–320 (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Vignesh
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Balaji
    • 1
  • M. Surya
    • 1
  • A. Vishnu Pragash
    • 1
  • R. Vishnu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKPR Institute of Engineering and TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations