Progress and Issues Related to Designing and 3D Printing of Endodontic Guide

  • Ankit NayakEmail author
  • Prashant K. Jain
  • P. K. Kankar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


In the case of calcified pulp canal, a customized guide is used for the formation of access cavity to remove the infected pulp from pulp chamber; this guided approach of treatment is known as guided endodontic. The accuracy of guided endodontic treatment depends on design and fabrication of the guide. Guide path and support structure are the two essential part of the endodontic guide. The guide path is a hole of specific orientation and diameter, responsible for the orientation of file to follow the pre-decided drilling path during treatment while the support structure of guide will provide grip and placement on the teeth. If there is some deviation between the reference point of guide and teeth, then it will be the cause of the surgical error. So the intent is to fabricate optimally oriented guide path with the detailed negative impression of the tooth crown on the guide, which will be able to perfectly grip and place on the teeth. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the patient face is used to get anatomical details of the tooth to decide the orientation of guide path. Similarly, the architectural details of teeth captured by intraoral surface scan (SS) data are used to design support structure of guide. CBCT and intraoral SS data are merged to get the combined detail of teeth anatomy and architecture. This combined dataset exported from computational software (CAD software package) to design the endodontic guide. After that the STL model of the designed guide will send for fabrication on additive manufacturing (AM) machine. The endodontic guide comprises of freeform surfaces, negative impression of teeth, and guide path, so it is utterly essential to retain these features after fabrication. However, AM is the prevalent technology for fabrication of customized parts, but due to induced volumetric error, feature loss will occur which may lead drill path deviation and treatment failure. If guide designs for additive manufacturing by keeping some factors (triangulation, slicing, build orientation, nozzle/laser velocity) in mind, then feature loss can easily be controlled. The design and fabrication issues for additive manufacturing of endodontic guide along with the recent developments in guided endodontic discussed in this article.


Additive manufacturing CAD Biomedical engineering Guided endodontics 


  1. 1.
    Ingle, J.I., Simon, J.H., et al.: Outcome of endodontic treatment and re-treatment. Ingle’s Endod. 5, 747–768 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abou-Rass, M., Frank, A.L., Glick, D.H.: The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 101, 792–794 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oliveira, M.A.V.C., Venâncio, J.F., Raposo, L.H.A., Barbosa Júnior, N., Biffi, J.C.G.: Morphometric evaluation and planning of anticurvature filing in roots of maxillary and mandibular molars. Braz. Oral Res. 29, 1–9 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nayak, A., Kankar, P.K., Jain, N., Jain, P.K.: Force and vibration correlation analysis in the self-adjusting file during root canal shaping: An in-vitro study. J. Dental Sci. (2018). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garg, H., Grewal, M.S.: Cone-beam computed tomography volumetric analysis and comparison of dentin structure loss after retrieval of separated instrument by using ultrasonic EMS and ProUltra tips. J. Endod. 42, 1693–1698 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park, P.S., Kim, K.D., Perinpanayagam, H., Lee, J.K., Chang, S.W., Chung, S.H., Kaufman, B., Zhu, Q., Safavi, K.E., Kum, K.Y.: Three-dimensional analysis of root canal curvature and direction of maxillary lateral incisors by using cone-beam computed tomography. J. Endod. 39, 1124–1129 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Estrela, C., Bueno, M.R., Sousa-Neto, M.D., Pécora, J.D.: Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images. Braz. Dent. J. 19, 114–118 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alharbi, N., Osman, R., Wismeijer, D.: Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 115, 760–767 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kernen, F., Benic, G.I., Payer, M., Schär, A., Müller-Gerbl, M., Filippi, A., Kühl, S.: Accuracy of three-dimensional printed templates for guided implant placement based on matching a surface scan with CBCT. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 18, 762–768 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krastl, G., Zehnder, M.S., Connert, T., Weiger, R.: Guided endodontics : a novel treatment approach for teeth with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology. Dental Traumatol. 32, 240–246 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    González Sánchez, J.A., Duran-Sindreu, F., de Noé, S., Mercadé, M., Roig, M.: Centring ability and apical transportation after overinstrumentation with ProTaper Universal and ProFile Vortex instruments. Int. Endod. J. 45, 542–551 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoo, Y.-S., Cho, Y.-B.: A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor. Dent. Endod. 37, 220–227 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nayak, A., Jain, P.K., Kankar, P.K., Jain, N.: Computer-aided design–based guided endodontic: a novel approach for root canal access cavity preparation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 232, 787–795 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buchgreitz, J., Buchgreitz, M., Mortensen, D., Bjørndal, L.: Guided access cavity preparation using cone-beam computed tomography and optical surface scans—an ex vivo study. Int. Endod. J. 49, 790–795 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zehnder, M.S., Connert, T., Weiger, R., Krastl, G.: Guided endodontics : accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int. Endod. J. 47, 966–972 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diogenes, A., Ruparel, N.B., Shiloah, Y., Hargreaves, K.M.: Regenerative endodontics: a way forward. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 147, 372–380 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dong, J., Ph, D.: WIP: a study on the development of endodontic micro robot. 8, 26–34 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taufik, M., Jain, P.K.: Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: a review. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 27, 47–73 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taufik, M., Jain, P.K.: Volumetric error control in layered manufacturing. In: 19th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 8th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems, vol. 4, p. V004T06A017. ASME (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAD/CAM Lab, Mechanical Engineering DisciplinePDPM Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing JabalpurJabalpurIndia

Personalised recommendations