Advertisement

An Untold Story of Groundwater Replenishment in India: Impact of Long-Term Policy Interventions

  • Abhijit MukherjeeEmail author
  • Soumendra Nath Bhanja
Chapter
Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

Over the past decade, the issue of diminishing groundwater resources in India has garnered significant concern worldwide. Indian groundwater abstraction may be ascribed as the “largest groundwater abstraction in human history”. However, our recent studies have identified replenishment of groundwater storage at regional scale in parts of southern and western India. These findings are based on our analyses and numerical modeling by using combination of in situ groundwater level observations from the Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation, Government of India, and observations from NASA’s GRACE satellites. The study suggests that recent paradigm change in the groundwater abstraction and management policies in India for sustainable groundwater utilization might start acting for replenishing the aquifers by increasing storage in western and southern India. Our results have given positive confirmation on the rejuvenation of groundwater resources as an effect of these efforts. In west (Gujarat) and south (Andhra Pradesh) regions of India, groundwater storage had been observed to decrease at rates of −5.81 ± 0.38 km3/year and −0.92 ± 0.12 km3/year between 1996 and 2001–2002, respectively. Consequently, the groundwater storage has been found to increase at rates of 2.04 ± 0.20 km3/year in Gujarat and 0.76 ± 0.08 km3/year in Andhra Pradesh between 2002–2003 and 2014. The groundwater replenishment is probably caused by a combination of government policy changes and the grassroots efforts of local communities, who have undertaken several projects over the last several years in the form of efficient groundwater management and utilization policies, which will probably act for the aquifer replenishment in terms of increasing groundwater storage in future times and optimistically transform India from a “groundwater-scarce” to a “groundwater-sufficient” country.

Keywords

Groundwater abstraction Aquifer Numerical modeling GRACE Groundwater storage Specific yield 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks are extended to the scientists of Central Groundwater Board for valuable suggestions and also the research scholars of IIT Kharagpur for their support. We would also like to thank Matthew Rodell (NASA GSFC), Yoshihide Wada (IIASA), Dipankar Saha (CGWB) and Amarjit Singh.

References

  1. Bates B, Kundzewicz Z, Wu S, Palutikof J (2008) Climate change and water. Technical paper of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland. ISBN: 978-92-9169-123-4Google Scholar
  2. Bhanja S, Mukherjee A, Rodell M, Velicogna I, Pangaluru K, Famiglietti J (2014) Regional groundwater storage changes in the Indian Sub-Continent: the role of anthropogenic activities. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, GC21B-0533Google Scholar
  3. Bhanja SN, Mukherjee A, Saha D, Velicogna I, Famiglietti JS (2016) Validation of GRACE based groundwater storage anomaly using in-situ groundwater level measurements in India. J Hydrol 543:729–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhanja SN, Rodell M, Li B, Saha D, Mukherjee A (2017a) Spatio-temporal variability of groundwater storage in India. J Hydrol 544:428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhanja SN, Mukherjee A, Rodell M, Wada Y, Chattopadhyay S, Velicogna I, Pangaluru K, Famiglietti JS (2017b) Groundwater rejuvenation in parts of India influenced by water-policy change implementation. Nat Sci Rep 7(1):7453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Central Ground Water Board (2012a) Ground water year book – India 2011–12. Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt of India, p 42. Available at www.cgwb.gov.in
  7. Central Ground Water Board (2012b) Aquifer systems of India. Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt of India, p 92. Available at www.cgwb.gov.in
  8. Central Ground Water Board (2013) Master plan for artificial recharge to ground water in India. Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt of India, p 225. Available at www.cgwb.gov.in
  9. Central Ground Water Board (2014a) Ground water year book – India 2013–14. Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt of India, p 76. Available at www.cgwb.gov.in
  10. Central Ground Water Board (2014b) Dynamic groundwater resources. Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt of India, p 283. Available at www.cgwb.gov.in
  11. Central Water Commission (2010) Water and related statistics. Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Govt of India, p 253Google Scholar
  12. Cheng M, Tapley BD (2004) Variations in the Earth’s oblateness during the past 28 yrs. J Geophys Res 109:B09402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis JC (2002) Statistics and data analysis in geology, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 656Google Scholar
  14. Famiglietti JS, Rodell M (2013) Water in the balance. Science 340(6138):1300–1301. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO (2013) FAO Statistical year book 2013: World Food and Agriculture, p 289. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3107e/i3107e00.htm
  16. Feng W, Zhong M, Lemoine JM, Biancale R, Hsu HT, Xia J (2013) Evaluation of groundwater depletion in North China using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data and ground-based measurements. Water Res Res 49(4):2110–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flechtner F (2007) AOD1B product description document for product releases 01 to 04 (Rev. 3.1, April 13, 2007). GRACE Project Document, pp 327–750Google Scholar
  18. Geruo A, Wahr J, Zhong S (2013) Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible earth to surface loading: an application to glacial isostatic adjustment in Antarctica and Canada. Geophys J Int 192(2):557–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacDonald AM, Bonsor HC, Ahmed KM, Burgess WG, Basharat M, Calow RC, Dixit A, Foster SSD, Gopal K, Lapworth DJ, Lark RM (2016) Groundwater quality and depletion in the Indo-Gangetic Basin mapped from in situ observations. Nat Geosci 9(10):762–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maxwell RM, Miller NL (2005) Development of a coupled land surface and groundwater model. J Hydrol 6:233–247Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Agriculture (2012) State of Indian agriculture 2011–12. Govt of India. Available at: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/State%20of%20Indian%20Agriculture%202011-12.pdf
  22. Ministry of Water Resources (2013) Press release. 29 April, 2013Google Scholar
  23. Mukherjee A, Saha D, Harvey CF, Taylor RG, Ahmed KM, Bhanja SN (2015) Groundwater systems of the Indian Sub-Continent. J Hydrol Reg Stud 4:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mukherjee A, Bhanja SN, Wada Y (2018) Groundwater depletion causing reduction of baseflow triggering Ganges river summer drying. Sci Rep 8(1):12049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Panda DK, Wahr J (2016) Spatiotemporal evolution of water storage changes in India from the updated GRACE-derived gravity records. Water Resour Res:51. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reager JT, Famiglietti JS (2013) Characteristic mega basin water storage behavior using GRACE. Water Resour Res 49(6):3314–3329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richey AS, Thomas BF, Lo M, Famiglietti JS, Reager JT, Voss K, Swenson S, Rodell M (2015) Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE. Wat Resour Res 51:5217–5238. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodell M, Houser PR, Jambor UEA, Gottschalck J, Mitchell K, Meng CJ, Arsenault K, Cosgrove B, Radakovich J, Bosilovich M, Entin JK (2004) The global land data assimilation system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85(3):381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodell M, Velicogna I, Famiglietti JS (2009) Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature 460:999–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacks WJ, Cook BI, Buenning N, Levis S, Helkowski JH (2009) Effects of global irrigation on the near-surface climate. Clim Dyn 33:159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0445-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shamsudduha M, Taylor RG, Longuevergne L (2012) Monitoring groundwater storage changes in the highly seasonal humid tropics: validation of GRACE measurements in the Bengal Basin. Water Resour Res 48. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010993
  32. Swenson SC, Chambers DP, Wahr J (2008) Estimating geocenter variations from a combination of GRACE and ocean model output. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 113(B8):B08410. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Ries JC, Thompson PF, Watkins MM (2004) GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science 305:503–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiwari VM, Wahr J, Swenson S (2009) Dwindling groundwater resources in northern India, from satellite gravity observations. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039401
  35. Voss KA, Famiglietti JS, Lo M, Linage C de, Rodell M, Swenson SC (2013) Groundwater depletion in the Middle East from GRACE with implications for transboundary water management in the Tigris-Euphrates-Western Iran region. Water Resour Res:49Google Scholar
  36. Wahr JM (2007) Time-variable gravity from satellites. Treatise Geophys 3:213–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watkins MM, Wiese DN, Yuan DN, Boening C, Landerer FW (2015) Improved methods for observing Earth’s time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011547Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Policy Advisory for Hydrogeoscience (APAH) Group, Department of Geology and Geophysics and School of Environmental Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (IIT)-KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Athabasca River Basin Research Institute (ARBRI)Athabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada

Personalised recommendations