Numerical Analysis of Bubble Hydrodynamics in a Steam Reactor Chemical Looping Reforming System

  • Akash ChavdaEmail author
  • Atal Harichandan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Hydrogen production using a three-reactor chemical looping reforming technology is an innovative process that allows cost-effective carbon capture and storage. A computational fluid dynamics model for the steam reactor of chemical looping reforming (CLR) process has been developed based on kinetic theory of granular flow. The reactive fluid dynamics system of the CLR process has been customized by incorporating the oxidation kinetic of the oxygen carrier into ANSYS Fluent software. An Eulerian multiphase treatment is used to describe the continuum principle of two-fluid model for both gas- and solid-phase models. In the present work, iron oxide and steam are used as oxygen carrier and fuel, respectively, for the reaction kinetic model of the steam reactor. Numerical simulations are carried out to capture the bubble hydrodynamics and the relationship between molar fraction of products and gas phase and bubble formation. The conversion rate of steam has been analyzed for different granular sizes, and the overall performance of a CLR system has been studied. The bubble hydrodynamics in terms of development, rise, growth, and burst of bubbles in the steam reactor has been simulated for unsteady and quasi-steady behavior. The quasi-steady state is also noticed to be achieved faster for finer particles than coarser ones that also ensures faster hydrogen production rate for the former case. Solid volume fraction contour has also been qualitatively compared with similar results available in the open literature.


Hydrogen production Chemical looping reforming Oxygen carrier Reaction kinetics Bubble hydrodynamics CFD 


  1. 1.
    Momirlan, M., Veziroglu, T.: Recent directions in world hydrogen production. Renew. Sustain. Rev. 3, 219–231 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunn, D.J.: Transfer of heat or mass to particles in fixed and fluidized beds. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 21, 467–476 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richter, H.J., Knoche, K.F.: Reversibility of combustion processes. In: ACS Symposium Series, vol. 235, pp. 71–85 (1983)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harichandan, A.B., Shamim, T.: CFD analysis of bubble hydrodynamics in a fuel reactor for a hydrogen-fueled chemical looping combustion system. Energy Conserv. Manag. 86, 1010–1022 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rydén, M., Lyngfelt, A., Mattisson, T.: Production of H2 and synthesis gas by chemical-looping reforming. In: The Eight International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Trondheim, Norway (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deng, Z., Xiao, R., Jin, B., Song, Q.: Numerical simulation of chemical looping combustion process with CaSO4 oxygen carrier. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 368–375 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan, M.N., Shamim, T.: Investigation of hydrogen in a three reactor chemical looping reforming process. Appl. Energy (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fan, L.-S., Zeng, L., Wang, W., Luo, S.: Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion - prospect and opportunity. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7254–7280 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang, M., Xu, L., Fan, M.: Progress in oxygen carrier development of methane-based chemical-looping reforming: a review. Appl. Energy 151, 143–156 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Protasova, L., Snijkers, F.: Recent developments in oxygen carrier materials for hydrogen production via chemical looping processes. Fuel 181, 75–93 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mattisson, T., Lyngfelt, A., Cho, P.: The use of iron oxide as an oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of methane with inherent separation of CO2. Fuel 80, 1953–1962 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ryu, H.J., Gin, G.T.: Chemical-looping hydrogen generation system: performance estimation and process selection. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 24(3), 527–531 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahalatkar, K., Kuhlman, J., Huckaby, E.D., O’Brien, T.: Computational fluid dynamic simulation of chemical looping fuel reactors utilizing gaseous fuels. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 469–479 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cho, W.C., SeO, M.W., Kim, S.D., Kang, K.S., Bae, K.K., Kim, S.H., et al.: Reactivity of iron oxide as an oxygen carrier for chemical-looping hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 16852–16863 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gelderbloom, S.J., Gidaspow, D., Lyczkowski, R.W.: CFD simulations of bubbling/collapsing fluidized beds for three Geldart groups. AlChE J. 49, 844–858 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hossain, M.: Fluidized bed chemical looping combustion: development of a bimetallic oxygen carrier and kinetic modeling. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clift, R., Grace, J.R.: Continuous Bubbling and Slugging. Academic Press, London (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marwadi Education Foundation Group of InstitutionsRajkotIndia

Personalised recommendations