Advertisement

EDM Framework for Knowledge Discovery in Educational Domain

  • Roopam Sadh
  • Rajeev Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 524)

Abstract

Large volume of data are generated in educational institutions, which are of heterogeneous and unstructured nature. However, there is a dearth of effective data mining tools and techniques which can handle these voluminous academic data and support exploration of essential knowledge. Educational data mining (EDM) is an emerging research area dedicated toward development of tools and techniques for exploring data in educational settings. In this paper, we propose a trusted EDM framework that can deliver multiple academic tasks according to the need of various stakeholders. In order to deliver such purposes, our framework utilizes data mining tools and techniques over unified data collected from institution’s databases and various knowledge sources. As an example of the concept, we utilize data provided by National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) for showing how same data can be mined to fulfill different needs of various stakeholders through our proposed framework.

Keywords

EDM Knowledge discovery Institutional ranking Academic quality Academic stakeholders 

References

  1. 1.
    Ketipi, A. K., Koulouriotis, D. E., Karakasis, E. G., Papakostas, G. A., & Tourassis, V. D. (2012). A flexible nonlinear approach to represent cause–effect relationships in FCMs. Applied Soft Computing, 12(12), 3757–3770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moscoso-Zea, O., Sampedro A., & Luján-Mora, S. (2016). Datawarehouse design for educational data mining. In 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1–6). Istanbul.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hussain, M., Al-Mourad, M. B., & Mathew, S. S. (2016). Collect, scope, and verify big data: A framework for institution accreditation. In: Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) (pp. 187–192). Crans-Montana.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fernández, D. B., & Luján-Mora, S. (2017). Comparison of applications for educational data mining in engineering education. In Proceedings of IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) (pp. 81–85). Santos.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peña-Ayala, A. (2014). Educational data mining: A survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1432–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews), 40(6), 601–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    García, S., Luengo, J., & Herrera, F. (2016). Tutorial on practical tips of the most influential data preprocessing algorithms in data mining. Knowledge-Based Systems, 98, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dutt, A., Ismail, M. A., & Herawan, T. (2017). A systematic review on educational data mining. IEEE Access, 5, 15991–16005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gambhir, V., Wadhwa, N. C., Grover S., & Goyal, S. (2012). Applying fuzzy MADM approach for the selection of technical institution. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1405–1408). Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charitopoulos, A., Rangoussi, M., & Koulouriotis, D. (2016). E-Learning platform access and usage statistics through data mining: An experimental study in moodle. In 9th International Conference of Education, Re-search and Innovation (ICERI’16) (pp. 2958–2967). Seville.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buniyamin, N., Mat, U. B., & Arshad, P. M. (2015). Educational data mining for prediction and classification of engineering student achievement. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 49–53). Kanazawa.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    NIRF homepage. Retrieved January 15, 2018 from https://www.nirfindia.org/About.
  15. 15.
    Kumar, A., & Tiwari, S. K. (2016). India rankings 2016: Ranking model for Indian higher educational institutions. In Proceedings of International Conference on ICT in Business Industry and Government (pp. 1–6). Indore.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2008). Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vardy, M. Y. (2016). Academic rankings considered harmful. Communications of the ACM, 59(9), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer and Systems SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations