A Delay-Oriented Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network

  • Yogesh TripathiEmail author
  • Arun Prakash
  • Rajeev Tripathi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 524)


Wireless sensor network (WSN) has become a prominent technology in order to access data from the remote or non-remote areas, e.g., forests, battlefields, hospitals, homes. As WSN has energy constraints, energy-efficient routing protocols are required to prolong the network lifetime. Delay is one of the important parameters for WSN because of it data losses its importance of data and creates congestion in the network also. In this paper, a delay-aware energy-efficient routing protocol is proposed. Delay is minimized with the help of mobile base station, and optimized numbers of hops improve the energy efficiency of proposed routing protocol. Simulation results show the improvement in performance over the existing routing protocol. Extensive simulation study is carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed protocol with respect to delay, throughput, average residual energy, and network lifetime.


WSN Routing Energy efficiency Hop count 



This work is supported by the council of science and technology under the project entitled “wireless sensor network (WSN) routing protocol for industrial applications: algorithm design and hardware”. Project grant number is CST/2872.


  1. 1.
    Sohraby, K., Minoli, D., & Znati, T. (2007). Wireless sensor networks: Technology, protocols, and applications. Willey.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhuyan, B., & Sarma, N. (2014). A delay aware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Science, 11(6), 60–65.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basagni, S., Carosi, A., Melachrinoudis, E., Petrioli, C., & Maria Wang, Z. (2008). Controlled sink mobility for prolonging wireless sensor network life time. Wireless Networks, 14(6), 831–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kulshrestha, J., & Mishra, M. K. (2017). An adaptive energy balanced and energy efficient approach for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 54, 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sara, G. S., & Sridharan, D. (2014). Routing in mobile wireless sensor network: a survey. Telecommunication Systems, 57(1), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Di Francesco, M., & Passarella, A. (2009). Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 7, 537–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang, Y., Fonoage, M. I., & Cardei, M. (2010). Improving network lifetime with mobile wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 33(4), 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olariu, S., & Stojmenovic, I. (2006). Design guidelines for maximizing lifetime and avoiding energy holes in sensor networks with uniform distribution and uniform reporting. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tunca, C., Isik, S., Donmez, M. Y., & Ersoy, C. (2014). Distributed mobile sink routing for wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(2), 877–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yan, J., Zhou, M., & Ding, Z. (2016). Recent advances in energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A review. IEEE Access, 4, 5673–5686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhuyan, B., & Sarma, N. (2016). A QoS aware routing protocol in wireless sensor networks with mobile base stations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of things and Cloud Computing. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Article No. 15.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zungeru, A. M., Ang, L. M., & Seng, K. P. (2012). Termite-hill: Routing towards a mobile sink for improving network lifetime in wireless sensor networks. In Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems Modelling and Simulation.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luo, J., Panchard, J., Piorkowski, M., Grossglauser, M., & Hubaux, J. (2006). MobiRoute: Routing towards a mobile sink for improving lifetime in sensor networks. In Proceedings of Second IEEE/ACM International Conference Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (pp. 480–497).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhardwaj, M., Garnett, T., & Chandrakasan, A. P. (2001). Upper bounds on the lifetime of sensor networks. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Communication (ICC’01) (Vol. 3, pp. 785–790).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Min, R., Bhardwaj, M., Ickes, N., Wang, A., & Chandrakasan, A. (2002). The hardware and the network: Total-system strategies for power aware wireless microsensors. In Proceeding of the IEEE CAS Workshop Wireless Communication Networks, Pasadena, CA, USA, (36–12).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo, J., Hu J., Wu, D., Renfa, L. (2015). Opportunistic routing algorithm for relay node selection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transaction on Industrial Informatics, 11(1), 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Network Simulator NS-2.
  18. 18.
    Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., & Das, S. (2003). Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. RFC Editor.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yogesh Tripathi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arun Prakash
    • 1
  • Rajeev Tripathi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringMotilal Nehru National Institute of Technology AllahabadAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations