Advertisement

Nuclear Power from Thorium: Some Frequently Asked Questions

  • Srikumar BanerjeeEmail author
  • Hari Prakash Gupta
Conference paper

Abstract

From the inception of the nuclear power programme, the role thorium will play in sustaining supply of clean, safe and affordable nuclear energy for several centuries to come is being deliberated. The question is often raised why no commercial energy production unit utilising thorium has become operational till today. The present paper will essentially address this issue using a rather simplified language. The advantages offered by the Th-U233 fuel cycle in reducing the radioactive waste burden of the spent fuel and making it proliferation resistant are well known. In spite of these advantages, the absence of any fissile nuclide in the natural thorium makes it essential first to convert thorium into U233 by transmutation, and then, to utilise the latter as a fuel. It is for this reason thorium has all along remained as the nuclear fuel for the “future”. A fairly steady value of η (above 2) of U233 in a wide range of neutron energy spectrum makes it usable in different types of nuclear reactors—thermal, epithermal and fast. It is argued here that utilisation of thorium for energy production can be initiated without much delay using essential technologies available today provided a sufficient inventory of fissile material as a driver fuel is made available. However, some challenging technological tasks such as remote fabrication of U233-based fuel and industrial scale reprocessing of the corresponding spent fuel need to be addressed for operating a sustainable Th-U233 fuel cycle.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS) of Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), India, for providing the financial assistance.

References

  1. 1.
    (a) Uranium 2007: Resources, production and demand. A Joint Report by Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2008, p. 28, https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2008/6345-uranium-2007.pdf (b) United States Geological Survey Mineral Commodity Summaries (2014), p. 167, https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/thorium/mcs-2014-thori.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2017
  2. 2.
    Uranium 2016: Resources, production and demand. A Joint Report by Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2016), p. 40, https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2016/7301-uranium-2016.pdf
  3. 3.
    Wikipedia, Occurrence of thorium. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occurrence_of_thorium. Accessed 27 April 2017
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    P.G. Boczar, et al., Thorium Fuel Cycle Studies for CANDU Reactors, vol. 1319 (IAEA-TECDOC, 2002), p. 25Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.G. Boczar, et al., Recent Advances in Thorium Fuel Cycles in CANDU Reactors, vol. 1319 (IAEA-TECDOC, 2002), p. 104Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.P. Gupta, S.V.G. Menon, S. Banerjee, Advance fuel cycles for use in PHWRs. J. Nucl. Mater. 383, 54–62 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.R. Sundararajan, L.V. Krishnan, P. Rodriguez, Radiological and environmental aspects of Th-U fuel cycle facilities. Prog. Nucl. Energy 32(3–4), 289–295 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Olson, et al., Fuel Summary Report—Shippingport Light Water Breeder Reactor, INEEL/EXT-98-00799, Rev. 2 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.C. Briant, A.M. Weinberg, Molten fluorides as power reactor fuels. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2, 797–803 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.R. Kasten, et al., Summary of molten salt breeder reactor design studies. ORNL-TM-1467 (1966)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.C. Roberson, Conceptual design study of single—fluid molten—salt breeder reactor. ORNL-4541 (1971)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.K. Wattal, Recycling challenges of thorium based fuel, in International Thorium Energy Conference (IThEC-13) held in Cern, Geneva, 27–31 Oct 2013Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Rajora, et al., Generating one group cross-section for isotope depletion and generation calculation for thorium, in A Paper Accepted for Presentation In International Thorium Energy Conference (ThEC-2015), to be held in Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, India, 12–15 Oct 2015Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Status and prospects of thermal breeders and their effect on fuel utilisation. Technical Reports Series No. 195, IAEA, 1979, p. 7Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Banerjee, H.P. Gupta, S.A. Bhardwaj, Nuclear power from thorium: different options. Curr. Sci. 111(10), 1607–1623 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.P. Gupta, Use of thorium in PHWRs, in National Conference on Power from Thorium: Present Status and Future Directions, Mumbai, 22–24 Dec 2014Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H.P. Gupta, R.D.S. Yadav, S.V.G. Menon, S. Banerjee, Utilisation of thorium in different reactors, in German Annual Meeting of Nuclear Technology-2009 Dresden, 12–14 May 2009Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Grove, Comparison of thorium and uranium fuel cycles. NNL (11) 11593(5), 9 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Radkowsky, A competitive thorium fuel cycle for pressurised water reactors of current technology. IAEA-TECDOC-1319 (2002), p. 25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.K. Sinha, A. Kakodkar, Design and development of AHWR—The Indian thorium fuelled innovative nuclear reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236, 683–700 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. Balakrishnan, A. Kakodkar, Preliminary physics design of advanced heavy water reactor (AHWR). IAEA-TECDOC-638, March 1990Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Thakur, et al., Fuel cycle flexibility in advanced heavy water reactor (AHWR) with the use of Th-LEU fuel, in International Conference on Future of HWRs, Ottawa, Canada, 2–5 Oct 2011Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Ramanna, S.M. Lee, The thorium cycle for fast breeder reactors. Pramana- J. Phys. 27(1&2), 129–157 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D.K. Mohapatra et al., Physics aspects of metal fuelled fast reactors with thorium in blanket. Nucl. Eng. Des. 265, 1232 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Hirakawa, et al., Molten salt reactor benchmark problem to constrain plutonium. IAEA-TECDOC-1319 (2002), p. 25Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trans atomic power, molten salt reactors. Technical White Paper, vol. 1.0.1, March 2014Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H.P. Gupta, Preliminary design of molten salt converter reactor, in Conference on Molten Salt Nuclear Technology (CMSNT), BARC, Mumbai, India, Jan 2013Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Rubbia, et al., Conceptual design of a fast neutron operated high power amplifier. CERN/AT/95-44(ET) (1995)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S.S. Kapoor, Accelerator-driven sub-critical reactor system (ADS) for nuclear energy generation. Pramana- J. Phys. 59(6), 941–950 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Introduction of thorium in nuclear fuel cycle, short to long term considerations. NEA No. 7224, Nuclear Science, OECD, 2015Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J.B. Dee, J. Kupitz, International status of HTGRs. IAEA Bullet. 26(4), 5 (1984)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. Babu, V. Ramanathan, B. Rajendran, P.V. Ramalingam, B. Raj, Proposed modernisation and refurbishment of instrumentation and control system of the FBTR and Kamini reactors of India. IAEA—TECDOC-1625 (2009), p. 95Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Homi Bhabha National InstituteMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations