Advertisement

Uniportal Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax

  • Alessandro Brunelli
  • Cecilia Pompili
Chapter

Abstract

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is the surgical treatment of choice for spontaneous pneumothorax. Most recently, this technique has been made even less invasive by the use of the single-port technique. Uniportal VATS treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax has been shown to be superior to traditional VATS in terms of pain and long-term paraesthesia, while ensuring the same efficacy in terms of prevention of recurrences.

We describe herein the technique of uniportal VATS bullectomy and pleurodesis, summarizing the principle steps of the procedures and the evidence from the literature.

Supplementary material

Video 1

(MOV 59677 kb)

Video 2

(MOV 108404 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(2):726–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(1):43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J, BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of spontaneous pneumo-thorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. ACCP Delphi Consensus Statement. Chest. 2001;119:590–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pagès PB, Delpy JP, Falcoz PE, Thomas PA, Filaire M, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Dahan M, Bernard A. Videothoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(1):258–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barker A, Maratos EC, Edmonds L, Lim E. Recurrence rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery in the prevention of recurrent pneumothoraces: a systematic review of randomised and non randomised trials. Lancet. 2007;370:329–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waller DA, Forty J, Morritt GN. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:372–6;discussion 376–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joshi V, Kirmani B, Zacharias J. Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95:61–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F, Refai M, Sciarra V, Soccetti A, Sabbatini A. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7(1):63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen PR, Chen CK, Lin YS, Huang HC, Tsai JS, Chen CY, Fang HY. Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qin SL, Huang JB, Yang YL, Xian L. Uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(12):2274–87.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Brunelli
    • 1
  • Cecilia Pompili
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Thoracic SurgerySt. James’s University HospitalLeedsUK
  2. 2.Leeds Institute of Cancer and PathologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations