Transnational Shakespeare

  • Kwok-kan Tam


There is no other English playwright and poet who is so widely taught in English departments all over the world as Shakespeare is. The centrality that Shakespeare enjoys in the English curriculum, as Robert Wilson puts it, has never come under doubt: “For many of us involved in the teaching of Shakespeare’s drama to undergraduates, the question of whether the playwright should hold such a dominant position in the curriculum rarely if ever crosses our minds. He is, after all, the major writer among major writers, the strongest link in the British Survey chain. He is also a shining star in the cultural firmament, especially in American society, where other British literary busts are rapidly gathering dust in English department basements” (1990, 206). Although Wilson’s remarks are made about Shakespeare in the English departments in American universities, much of what he says also sheds light on the worldwide significance of Shakespeare. Today, Shakespeare is as much a part of world culture as a part of English culture.


  1. Auden, W. H. 1986. “Macbeth and Oedipus.” In Shakespearean Tragedies, edited by Laurence Lerner, 217–23. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Bate, Jonathan, Jill L. Levenson, and Dieter Mehl eds. 1998. Shakespeare and the twentieth century: The selected proceedings of the international Shakespeare association world congress, Los Angeles, 1996. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, Harold. 1998. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead Press.Google Scholar
  4. Booth, Wayne. 1986. “Shakespeare’s Tragic Villain.” In Shakespearean Tragedies, edited by Laurence Lerner, 180–90. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Brockbank, J. Philip. 1988. “Shakespeare Renaissance in China.” Shakespeare Quarterly 39, no. 2 (Summer): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crane, R. S. 1986. “Tragic Structure.” In Shakespearean Tragedies, edited by Laurence Lerner, 208–12. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Dessen, Alan C. 1987. “What’s New? Shakespeare on Stage in 1986.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38, no. 1 (Spring): 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fergusson, Francis. 1970. “Macbeth as the Imitation of an Action.” In Essays in Shakespearean Criticism, edited by James L. Calderwood and Harold E. Toliver, 513–20. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. He, Qi-Xin. 1986. “China’s Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Quarterly 37, no. 2 (Summer): 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joughin, John J., ed. 1997. Shakespeare and National Culture. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kishi, T., Pringle, R., & Wells, Stanley eds. 1994. Shakespeare and cultural traditions: The selected proceedings of the International Shakespeare Association World Congress, Tokyo, 1991. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  12. Liu, James. 1955. Elizabethan and Yuan. London: The China Society.Google Scholar
  13. Oba, Kenji. 1982. “Shakespeare in Tokyo.” Shakespeare Quarterly 33, no. 4 (Winter): 498–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Powell, Brian.1998. “One Man’s Hamlet in 1911 Japan: The Bungei Kyokai Production in the Imperial Theatre.” In Shakespeare and the Japanese Stage, edited by Takashi Saayama, J. R. Mulryne, and Margaret Shewring, 38–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Qian, Zhongshu. 1978. “Tragedy in Old Chinese Drama.” T’ien Hsia Monthly 1, no. 1 (August 1935). Reprinted in Renditions 9 (Spring): 85–91.Google Scholar
  16. Scott, William O. 1986. “Macbeth’s—And Our—Self-Equivocations.” Shakespeare Quarterly 37, no. 2 (Summer):160–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vickers, Brian. 1993. “Preface.” In Appropriating Shakespeare: Contemporary Critical Quarrels, ix–xvii. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wakeman, Caoly. 1982. “Measure for Measure on the Chinese Stage.” Shakespeare Quarterly 33, no. 4 (Winter): 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilson, Robert F., Jr. 1990. “Why Teach Shakespeare? A Reconsideration.” Shakespeare Quarterly 41, no. 2 (Summer): 206–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yung, Bell. 1989. Cantonese Opera: Performance as Creative Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kwok-kan Tam
    • 1
  1. 1.The Hang Seng University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations